IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20047.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Überlegungen zu einer interaktionsökonomischen Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit

Author

Listed:
  • Suchanek, Andreas

Abstract

Es dürfte wenige Begriffe geben, die für die Theoriebildung eine solche Herausforderung dar-stellen wie das Konzept der Nachhaltigkeit. Denn die Prominenz, die es mittlerweile erlangt hat, kann nicht über die Tatsache hinwegtäuschen, dass es bis heute keine befriedigende Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit gibt. In dem allgemeinen Sinne, wie das Konzept seit dem Brundtlandbericht (Hauff 1987) verwendet wird, ist es vermutlich auch gar nicht möglich, eine Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit zu entwickeln. Vielmehr ist zu vermuten, dass es mehrere Zugänge zu diesem hochkomplexen Thema geben muss, um den vielfältigen Aspekten und Problemstellungen der Thematik gerecht werden zu können...

Suggested Citation

  • Suchanek, Andreas, 2004. "Überlegungen zu einer interaktionsökonomischen Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit," Discussion Papers 2004-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170243/1/dp2004-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aumann, Robert J., 1998. "On the Centipede Game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 97-105, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hillas, John & Samet, Dov, 2022. "Non-Bayesian correlated equilibrium as an expression of non-Bayesian rationality," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Giacomo Bonanno, 2011. "Reasoning about strategies and rational play in dynamic games," Working Papers 1111, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    3. Ashton T. Sperry-Taylor, 2017. "Strategy Constrained by Cognitive Limits, and the Rationality of Belief-Revision Policies," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Giacomo Bonanno, 2011. "Reasoning about strategies and rational play in dynamic games," Working Papers 9, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    5. Jijian Fan, 2023. "Delay to Deal: Bargaining with Indivisibility and Round-Dependent Transfer," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-8, September.
    6. Dekel, Eddie & Siniscalchi, Marciano, 2015. "Epistemic Game Theory," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:61-72 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Asheim, Geir B., 2002. "On the epistemic foundation for backward induction," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 121-144, November.
    9. James Tremewan & Chloé Le Coq & Alexander D. Wagner, 2013. "Social Centipedes: the Impact of Group Identity on Preferences and Reasoning," Vienna Economics Papers 1305, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    10. Le Coq, Chloé & Tremewan, James & Wagner, Alexander K., 2015. "On the effects of group identity in strategic environments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 239-252.
    11. Licun Xue, "undated". "A Notion of Consistent Rationalizability - Between Weak and Pearce's Extensive Form Rationalizability," Economics Working Papers 2000-4, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Bonanno, Giacomo, 2014. "A doxastic behavioral characterization of generalized backward induction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 221-241.
    13. García-Pola, Bernardo & Iriberri, Nagore & Kovářík, Jaromír, 2020. "Non-equilibrium play in centipede games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 391-433.
    14. Giacomo Bonanno, 2013. "An epistemic characterization of generalized backward induction," Working Papers 60, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    15. Khan, M. Ali & Yu, Haomiao & Zhang, Zhixiang, 2015. "On the centipede game with a social norm," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 16-19.
    16. Dov Samet, 2016. "On the dispensable role of time in games of perfect information," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 45(1), pages 375-387, March.
    17. Hillas, John & Samet, Dov, 2020. "Dominance rationality: A unified approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 189-196.
    18. Giacomo Bonanno, 2018. "Behavior and deliberation in perfect-information games: Nash equilibrium and backward induction," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1001-1032, September.
    19. Ignacio Palacios-Huerta & Oscar Volij, 2009. "Field Centipedes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1619-1635, September.
    20. Eyran Gisches & Amnon Rapoport, 2012. "Degrading network capacity may improve performance: private versus public monitoring in the Braess Paradox," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 267-293, August.
    21. Graciela Kuechle, 2009. "What Happened To The Three‐Legged Centipede Game?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 562-585, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.