IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kitiip/4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A regional simulation and optimisation of renewable energy supply from wind and photovoltaics with respect to three key energy-political objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Killinger, Sven
  • Mainzer, Kai
  • McKenna, Russell
  • Kreifels, Niklas
  • Fichtner, Wolf

Abstract

Currently, most photovoltaic (PV) modules are aligned in a way that maximizes the overall annual yields, which leads to significant peaks in electricity production and could threaten energy policy objectives such as security of supply as well as environmental sustainability. The exploitation of remaining PV potentials at seemingly economically sub-optimal inclinations and azimuth angles could partly counteract this trend by achieving significant temporal shifts in the electricity production. This paper addresses the potential of these counter-measures by evaluating the optimal mix of wind and PV installations with different inclination and azimuth angles in a regional context. It does so by adhering to three distinctive energy policy goals: economic efficiency, sustainability and security of supply. It is further assumed that the examined regions aim for energetic autarky. The hourly yields of wind parks and PV installations with different mounting configurations are simulated for four representative NUTS3-regions in Germany, based on assumed installed capacities and specific weather conditions. These profiles are combined with standardized regional electricity demand profiles and fed into an optimization model, which is employed to maximise each of the three energy policy goals independently. As a result the optimal installed capacity for PV for every possible configuration – determined by inclination and azimuth angles – and the optimal installed capacity of wind power are determined. The results indicate that the optimal mix differs significantly for each of the chosen goals and depends on regional conditions, but shows a high transferability in terms of general conclusions. For economic efficiency – the first of the three goals – a focus on a high share of wind power and south-oriented PV-systems is feasible for all German regions. When sustainability is chosen as the energy policy goal, results depend largely on the conventional power plant utilization and its CO2-equivalent emissions leading to a high share of PV-systems in ratio to wind power. When maximizing the third goal, the security of supply, PV plants facing east and west as well as wind turbines are preferred, since this homogenizes the daily combined PV production. The developed methodology is found to be robust with regard to the relative conclusions, whilst the absolute magnitude of the results is sensitive to the input data. Further work should focus on refining the representativeness of the four model regions and on quantifying the three considered criteria more holistically.

Suggested Citation

  • Killinger, Sven & Mainzer, Kai & McKenna, Russell & Kreifels, Niklas & Fichtner, Wolf, 2014. "A regional simulation and optimisation of renewable energy supply from wind and photovoltaics with respect to three key energy-political objectives," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 4, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kitiip:4
    DOI: 10.5445/IR/1000041755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/176730/1/kit-iip-wp-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5445/IR/1000041755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoicka, Christina E. & Rowlands, Ian H., 2011. "Solar and wind resource complementarity: Advancing options for renewable electricity integration in Ontario, Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 97-107.
    2. Mondol, Jayanta Deb & Yohanis, Yigzaw G. & Norton, Brian, 2007. "The impact of array inclination and orientation on the performance of a grid-connected photovoltaic system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 118-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kougias, Ioannis & Szabó, Sándor & Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio & Huld, Thomas & Bódis, Katalin, 2016. "A methodology for optimization of the complementarity between small-hydropower plants and solar PV systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 1023-1030.
    2. Killinger, Sven & Mainzer, Kai & McKenna, Russell & Kreifels, Niklas & Fichtner, Wolf, 2015. "A regional optimisation of renewable energy supply from wind and photovoltaics with respect to three key energy-political objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 563-574.
    3. Jurasz, Jakub & Beluco, Alexandre & Canales, Fausto A., 2018. "The impact of complementarity on power supply reliability of small scale hybrid energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 737-743.
    4. Sun, Wei & Harrison, Gareth P., 2019. "Wind-solar complementarity and effective use of distribution network capacity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 89-101.
    5. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2017. "Measurement of returns to scale on large photovoltaic power stations in the United States and Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 306-320.
    6. Nasiri, Reza & Radan, Ahmad, 2011. "Adaptive decoupled control of 4-leg voltage-source inverters for standalone photovoltaic systems: Adjusting transient state response," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2733-2741.
    7. Armendariz-Lopez, J.F. & Luna-Leon, A. & Gonzalez-Trevizo, M.E. & Arena-Granados, A.P. & Bojorquez-Morales, G., 2016. "Life cycle cost of photovoltaic technologies in commercial buildings in Baja California, Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 564-571.
    8. Dujardin, Jérôme & Kahl, Annelen & Kruyt, Bert & Bartlett, Stuart & Lehning, Michael, 2017. "Interplay between photovoltaic, wind energy and storage hydropower in a fully renewable Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 513-525.
    9. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2014. "Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 271-288.
    10. Hoicka, Christina E. & Lowitzsch, Jens & Brisbois, Marie Claire & Kumar, Ankit & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Ismail, M.S. & Moghavvemi, M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Muttaqi, K.M. & Moghavvemi, S., 2015. "Effective utilization of excess energy in standalone hybrid renewable energy systems for improving comfort ability and reducing cost of energy: A review and analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 726-734.
    12. Neto, Pedro Bezerra Leite & Saavedra, Osvaldo R. & Oliveira, Denisson Q., 2020. "The effect of complementarity between solar, wind and tidal energy in isolated hybrid microgrids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 339-355.
    13. Calvert, K. & Pearce, J.M. & Mabee, W.E., 2013. "Toward renewable energy geo-information infrastructures: Applications of GIScience and remote sensing that build institutional capacity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 416-429.
    14. Pérez Odeh, Rodrigo & Watts, David & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías, 2018. "Portfolio applications in electricity markets review: Private investor and manager perspective trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 192-204.
    15. Abedi, S. & Alimardani, A. & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Riahy, G.H. & Hosseinian, S.H., 2012. "A comprehensive method for optimal power management and design of hybrid RES-based autonomous energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1577-1587.
    16. Alfonso Risso & Alexandre Beluco & Rita De Cássia Marques Alves, 2018. "Complementarity Roses Evaluating Spatial Complementarity in Time between Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Koo, Choongwan & Si, Ke & Li, Wenzhuo & Lee, JeeHee, 2022. "Integrated approach to evaluating the impact of feed-in tariffs on the life cycle economic performance of photovoltaic systems in China: A case study of educational facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    18. Winfield, Mark & Dolter, Brett, 2014. "Energy, economic and environmental discourses and their policy impact: The case of Ontario׳s Green Energy and Green Economy Act," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 423-435.
    19. Sánchez Reinoso, Carlos R. & Milone, Diego H. & Buitrago, Román H., 2013. "Simulation of photovoltaic centrals with dynamic shading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 278-289.
    20. Orioli, Aldo & Di Gangi, Alessandra, 2014. "Review of the energy and economic parameters involved in the effectiveness of grid-connected PV systems installed in multi-storey buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 955-969.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kitiip:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.iip.kit.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.