IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iwhson/12013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse: Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (Ed.)

Abstract

Im März 2012 trafen sich Input-Output-Experten aus dem Bereich Forschung, Lehre und Statistik im deutschsprachigen Raum zum sechsten Mal am Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle und stellten ihre neuesten Arbeiten zum Tabellenwerk der Input-Output-Analyse und neueren Anwendungen zur Diskussion. Der Veranstalter der Tagung hat aufgrund der Vielfalt der Themen das Motto des ersten Treffens im Jahr 2002 beibehalten und präsentiert die Beiträge wieder unter dem Titel 'Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse'. Die Publikationsreihe umfasst mit dem vorliegenden Sonderheft bereits sechs Bände. Der neue Band enthält die aktualisierte Fassung der Vorträge, die auf dem Workshop vom 15. bis 16. März 2012 in Halle (Saale) zu vier thematischen Schwerpunkten gehalten und zur Veröffentlichung eingereicht worden sind oder nachgereicht wurden. Im ersten Schwerpunkt werden neue Aktivitäten zur Erstellung nationaler Input-Output-Tabellen und zu deren Erweiterung vorgestellt. Hier präsentieren R. Fremdling und R. Stäglin erstmalig ihre abschließende Input-Output-Tabelle für das Deutsche Reich im Jahr 1936. Sie umfasst 39 Sektoren, fünf Kategorien der Endnachfrage und fünf primäre Einsatzfaktoren. U.-P. Reich entwickelt einen Vorschlag zur Erweiterung der Standardversion einer Input-Output-Tabelle um eine Sozialrechnungsmatrix (social accounting matrix), mit der die Erfassung der Produktionsverflechtungen um die Verflechtung unterschiedlicher Lebenslagen von privaten Haushalten in Deutschland erweitert werden kann. J. Richter analysiert anhand der Input-Output-Tabellen für Österreich im Jahr 2007 den komplexen Aufbau der Datengrundlage in Form verschiedener Schichten von Informationen, arbeitet den Erkenntnischarakter der einzelnen Schichten heraus und stellt sie wie ein Gebirge dar. Das Kapitel wird abgerundet mit einem Beitrag zur Hochschullehre. Vor dem Hintergrund des institutionellen und technologischen Wandels in Markt- und Transformationswirtschaften bricht J.-M. Emmenegger eine Lanze für die Wiederbelebung und Entwicklung eines Curriculums mit dem Schwerpunkt Input- Output-Analyse. In Grundzügen entwirft er ein Stufenprogramm für das Studium an Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Suggested Citation

  • Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (Ed.), 2013. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse: Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2012," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhson:12013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/140936/1/SH_13-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timo Tohmo, 2004. "New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 43-54.
    2. Andrea BONFIGLIO, 2005. "Ca Non-survey Methods Substitute for Survey-based Models ? A Performance Analysis of Indirect Techniques of Estimating I-O Coefficients and Multipliers," Working Papers 230, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    3. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 1997. "On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 795-805.
    4. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 2000. "Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 563-569.
    5. Jin Shui Zhang, 2008. "A Multi-sector Nonlinear Dynamic Input-Output Model with Human Capital," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 223-237.
    6. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    7. William A. Schaffer & Kong Chu, 1969. "Nonsurvey Techniques For Constructing Regional Interindustry Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 83-104, January.
    8. Edler, Dietmar & Ribakova, Tatjana, 1993. "The Leontief-Duchin-Szyld dynamic input-output model with reduction of idle capacity and modified decision function," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 279-297, December.
    9. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    10. Oliver Roehn & Theo Eicher & Thomas Strobel, 2007. "The Ifo Industry Growth Accounting Database," CESifo Working Paper Series 1915, CESifo.
    11. Tony Flegg & T. Tohmo, 2010. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland (revised)," Working Papers 1005, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    2. Tobias Kronenberg, 2012. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA)," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 175-191, September.
    3. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    4. Kronenberg, Tobias & Többen, Johannes, 2011. "Regional input-output modelling in Germany: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia," MPRA Paper 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    6. Xesús Pereira-López & Napoleón Guillermo Sánchez-Chóez & Melchor Fernández-Fernández, 2021. "Performance of bidimensional location quotients for constructing input–output tables," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Kronenberg, Tobias, 2011. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts," MPRA Paper 30797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Yu. Yu. Ponomarev & D. Yu. Evdokimov, 2021. "Construction of Truncated Input–Output Tables for Russian Regions Using Location Quotients," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 619-630, November.
    9. Andrea BONFIGLIO, 2008. "Evaluating Implications of Agricultural Policies in a Rural Region through a CGE Analysis," Working Papers 328, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    10. Kowalewski Julia, 2013. "Inter-industrial Relations and Sectoral Employment Development in German Regions," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(4), pages 486-504, August.
    11. Lankhuizen, Maureen & Boonstra, Harm Jan & de Blois, Chris, 2020. "Unpacking freight – Identifying conditions driving regional freight transport in statistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 415-435.
    12. Xesús Pereira-López & Napoleón Guillermo Sánchez-Chóez & Melchor Fernández-Fernández, 2022. "Spotting Error Patterns in Input–Output Projections Using Location Quotients," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2021. "Estimation of regional input coefficients and output multipliers for the regions of Chile," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(4), pages 875-889, August.
    14. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.
    15. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2016. "Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 21-37, March.
    16. Tobias Kronenberg, 2009. "Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 40-64, January.
    17. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using Charm to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 391-413, September.
    18. Xiaoyun Zhao & Sung-Goan Choi, 2015. "On the regionalization of input–output tables with an industry-specific location quotient," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 901-926, May.
    19. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "A comment on Tobias Kronenberg's "Construction of regional input-output tables using nonsurvey methods: the role of cross-hauling"," Working Papers 20111111, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    20. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The Use of the FLQ is not a Gamble," Working Papers 20131302, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iwhson:12013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwhhhde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.