IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse25/331261.html

Monetizing 5G Capabilities: A Socio-Economic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chiha, Asma
  • Verbrugge, Sofie
  • Colle, Didier

Abstract

Mobile Network Operators continue to face challenges in generating sufficient revenue streams from 5G networks, especially in use cases where societal value far exceeds immediate financial returns. Safety-critical applications, such as real-time emergency response, autonomous vehicle coordination, and drone-based emergency services, demonstrate unique capabilities of 5G in delivering ultra-low latency and high reliability. However, these applications often struggle to justify network investment purely on commercial grounds. This research argues for a broader, impact-driven perspective that recognizes the socio-economic and environmental value these solutions deliver, particularly in alignment with global sustainability goals. Focusing on Belgium, this study investigates the deployment of a 5G-based Safety Drone Shield solution designed to support emergency services with real-time situational awareness through drones equipped with advanced imaging, sensors, and ultra-reliable connectivity via 5G networks. We adopt a hybrid socio-economic assessment framework, combining qualitative tools (interviews and surveys) with quantitative methods including Social Return on Investment (SROI) and sensitivity analysis. This enables us to evaluate both tangible and intangible impacts in a rigorous and structured way. Our findings show that the 5G Safety Drone solution generates up to €28 of societal value per €1 invested, which means an SROI ratio of 28:1. Positive impacts are particularly pronounced in relation to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), notably Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being), Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities).

Suggested Citation

  • Chiha, Asma & Verbrugge, Sofie & Colle, Didier, 2025. "Monetizing 5G Capabilities: A Socio-Economic Perspective," 33rd European Regional ITS Conference, Edinburgh, 2025: Digital innovation and transformation in uncertain times 331261, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse25:331261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/331261/1/ITS-E-2025-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Munda, Giuseppe, 2004. "Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(3), pages 662-677, November.
    2. Annelies Schoeters & Maxime Large & Martin Koning & Laurent Carnis & Stjin Daniels & Dominique Mignot & Raschid Urmeew & Wim Wijnen & Frits Bijleveld & Martin van der Horst, 2022. "Economic valuation of preventing fatal and serious road injuries. Results of a Willingness-To-Pay study in four European countries," Post-Print hal-03782320, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
    2. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Giuseppe Munda, 2005. "“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 117-134, January.
    4. White, Leroy & Lee, Gregory John, 2009. "Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 683-692, March.
    5. Locatelli, Bruno & Rojas, Varinia & Salinas, Zenia, 2008. "Impacts of payments for environmental services on local development in northern Costa Rica: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 275-285, April.
    6. Adams, Michelle & Wheeler, David & Woolston, Genna, 2011. "A participatory approach to sustainable energy strategy development in a carbon-intensive jurisdiction: The case of Nova Scotia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2550-2559, May.
    7. Sebastian Schär & Jutta Geldermann, 2021. "Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Vatn, Arild, 2009. "An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2207-2215, June.
    9. Frank Hanssen & Roel May & Jiska van Dijk & Jan Ketil Rød, 2018. "Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool Suite for Consensus-Based Siting of Renewable Energy Structures," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Yuxue Yang & Xuejiao Tan & Yafei Shi & Jun Deng, 2023. "What are the core concerns of policy analysis? A multidisciplinary investigation based on in-depth bibliometric analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Zepharovich, Elena & Ceddia, M. Graziano & Rist, Stephan, 2021. "Social multi-criteria evaluation of land-use scenarios in the Chaco Salteño: Complementing the three-pillar sustainability approach with environmental justice," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Amidou Kpoumié & Sébastien Damart & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2012. "Integrating Cognitive Mapping Analysis into Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding," Working Papers hal-00875480, HAL.
    13. AlSabbagh, Maha & Siu, Yim Ling & Guehnemann, Astrid & Barrett, John, 2017. "Integrated approach to the assessment of CO2e-mitigation measures for the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 203-215.
    14. Garmendia, Eneko & Stagl, Sigrid, 2010. "Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1712-1722, June.
    15. Cavallaro, Federico & Costa, Carlo & De Biasi, Ilaria & Fabio, Alberto & Nocera, Silvio, 2024. "Sustainable pathways for mitigating externalities in long-distance terrestrial transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 207-221.
    16. Andonegi, Aitor & Garmendia, Eneko & Aldezabal, Arantza, 2021. "Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Luzzati, Tommaso & Tucci, Ilaria & Guarnieri, Pietro, 2022. "Information overload and environmental degradation: Learning from H.A. Simon and W. Wenders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    19. José Carlos Romero & Pedro Linares, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse25:331261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.