IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse12/60380.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Which economic model for mobile payments?

Author

Listed:
  • Chaix, Laetitia
  • Torre, Dominique

Abstract

This paper explores the economic models associated to different mobile-payment systems. We first present the existing experiences and review the few economic literature on the subject. We then concentrate on the four economic models currently experimented around the world: the operator-centric model, the bank-centric model, the collaborative model, and the independent service provider model. We select relevant cases of recent development of these models and we try to present them in an appropriated theoretical settings. We find that their fundamental components make them viable systems, able to improve without ambiguity the transaction technology in different economic environments. These models have however different advantages and limits. If we limit the analysis to quite large distant payments, the operator-centric model is adapted to emerging countries without a banking system sufficiently dense, with users making a relative few number of relatively large distant payments. The bank-centric could have been more adapted to professional users in countries with a fully developed financial environment. These characteristics are also observed for the two others models. The independent service provider (ISP) model seems now the main competitor of the bank-centric model. The structure of the costs and the technology of this model, out of the control of operators (and partly from banks) seem more adapted for users making many payments in a secure and developed economic area. Despite difficulties to define precisely its structure of governance, the collaborative model can also compete with the operator centric one in a non fully bancarized environment. We finally discuss the results and compare the potentiality of the four models.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaix, Laetitia & Torre, Dominique, 2012. "Which economic model for mobile payments?," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60380, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse12:60380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60380/1/720211506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    2. Linck, K. & Pousttchi, Key & Wiedemann, Dietmar Georg, 2006. "Security Issues in Mobile Payment from the Customer Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 2923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    2. Sabo Ahmad & Siti Alida John Abdullah & Rozita Arshad, 2016. "A Model of Citizens’ Participation in Elections Using E-Voting System in Nigeria," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 170-187.
    3. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2006_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chen, Xiaogang & Ma, Jing & Jin, Jiafei & Fosh, Patricia, 2013. "Information privacy, gender differences, and intrinsic motivation in the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 917-926.
    6. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    7. Say Keat Ooi & Chai Aun Ooi & Jasmine A. L. Yeap & Tok Hao Goh, 2021. "Embracing Bitcoin: users’ perceived security and trust," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1219-1237, August.
    8. Yao, Meifang & Di, He & Zheng, Xianrong & Xu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Impact of payment technology innovations on the traditional financial industry: A focus on China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 199-207.
    9. Shah, Mahmood Hussain & Peikari, Hamid Reza & Yasin, Norjaya M., 2014. "The determinants of individuals’ perceived e-security: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 48-57.
    10. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    11. Singh, Nidhi & Sinha, Neena, 2020. "How perceived trust mediates merchant's intention to use a mobile wallet technology," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    13. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-34, May.
    14. Dass, Rajanish & Pal, Sujoy, 2011. "Adoption of Mobile Financial Services among Rural Under-Banked," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-02-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Tina M. Lowrey, 2008. "The Case for a Complexity Continuum," Working Papers 0051, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    16. Yoris A. Au & Humayun Zafar, 2008. "A Multi-Country Assessment of Mobile Payment Adoption," Working Papers 0055, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    17. Jaydeep Mukherjee, 2016. "A comprehensive framework for adoption of mobile broadband services in Indian cities," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(1), pages 9-25, January.
    18. Titilope Ayobami Agbotoba & Hameed Olusegun Adebambo, 2021. "ICT Utilisation in Agric Based SMES in Akure South Local Government Area, Ondo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(10), pages 421-426, October.
    19. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    20. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits : survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    21. Oliver Michler & Reinhold Decker & Christian Stummer, 2020. "To trust or not to trust smart consumer products: a literature review of trust-building factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 391-420, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electronic Payment; Mobile Payment; Business Models; Network Externalities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E42 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Monetary Sytsems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse12:60380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.