IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ieadps/313978.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Balancing the economy: The hand of government or the invisible hand?

Author

Listed:
  • Shackleton, J. R.
  • Zuluaga, Diego

Abstract

Despite its considerable strengths, the UK economy is seen as having a number of problems, in particular productivity which lags behind some competitors, low levels of investment and persistent regional disparities. Following the referendum decision to leave the EU, there is wide interest in developing a new industrial strategy. The UK has a growing comparative advantage in services which the government should not attempt to frustrate by favouring manufacturing. The past record of industrial policy in the UK is a catalogue of waste and ineffectiveness. By the end of the 1970s it was widely accepted that the strategy of attempting to pick winners and promoting national champions was fundamentally flawed. While political pressures mean that the revival of interest in industrial strategy is understandable, it is not clear that the sectorally-based policies being suggested are fundamentally different from those proposed in the past. Governments are still likely to be tempted to intervene for narrowly political motives and it is still assumed that governments possess insights which the private sector is denied. The UK's economy and its population would be better supported by a revival of 'horizontal' rather than 'sectoral' strategy, concentrating on boosting competition, relaxing planning controls, liberalising energy, deregulating markets and promoting tax reform. The government should also eschew protectionism and excessive restrictions on migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Shackleton, J. R. & Zuluaga, Diego, 2016. "Balancing the economy: The hand of government or the invisible hand?," IEA Discussion Papers 78, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:313978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/313978/1/iea-dp078.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Spackman, 2013. "Government Time Discounting and Required Rates of Return: UK History and Current Issues," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 190-206, June.
    2. Kealey, Terence & Ricketts, Martin, 2014. "Modelling science as a contribution good," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1014-1024.
    3. Takatoshi Ito & Anne O. Krueger, 1995. "Growth Theories in Light of the East Asian Experience," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number ito_95-2, October.
    4. Devlin, Robert & Moguillansky, Graciela, 2012. "What's new in the new industrial policy in Latin America ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6191, The World Bank.
    5. David Henderson, 2015. "Comparing Real GDP Across Countries: The Issues Revisited," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 286-298, June.
    6. Atif Ansar & Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2016. "Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 360-390.
    7. Takatoshi Ito & Anne O. Krueger, 1995. "Introduction to "Growth Theories in Light of the East Asian Experience, NBER-EASE volume 4"," NBER Chapters, in: Growth Theories in Light of the East Asian Experience, NBER-EASE Volume 4, pages 1-6 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Alberto Mingardi, 2015. "A Critique of Mazzucato's Entrepreneurial State," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 35(3), pages 603-625, Fall.
    9. Chang, Ha-Joon, 1993. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Korea," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 131-157, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lane, Nathaniel, 2016. "Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Policy and Industrialization in South Korea," SocArXiv 6tqax, Center for Open Science.
    2. Chi‐Wa Yuen, 1998. "The Fifth Asian Dragon: Sources Of Growth In Guangdong, 1979–1994," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Ajit Singh, 1998. "Savings, investment and the corporation in the East Asian miracle," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 112-137.
    4. Thanasis Stengos & Aurangzeb Aurangzeb, 2008. "An empirical investigation of the relationship between education and growth in Pakistan," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 345-359.
    5. Sorin-George Toma, 2019. "Learning From The Asian Tigers: Lessons In Economic Growth," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 63-69, June.
    6. Y. Wu, 1997. "Productivity & Efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese regional economies," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 97-18, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    7. Sharmistha Self & Richard Grabowski, 2008. "Examining The Link Between Japan'S Development And Education Of Females," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 279-288, August.
    8. Debi Prasad Bal & Devi Prasad Dash & Bibhudutta Subhasish, 2016. "The Effects of Capital Formation on Economic Growth in India: Evidence from ARDL-bound Testing Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(6), pages 1388-1400, December.
    9. Anusha Chari & Peter Blair Henry & Hector Reyes, 2021. "The Baker Hypothesis: Stabilization, Structural Reforms, and Economic Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 83-108, Summer.
    10. Harry X. Wu, 2011. "Rethinking China's Path of Industrialization," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-076, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Syed Hasan & H. Allen Klaiber & Ian Sheldon, 2020. "The impact of science parks on small- and medium-sized enterprises’ productivity distributions: the case of Taiwan and South Korea," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 135-153, January.
    12. Wei Chi & Xiaoye Qian, 2010. "The role of education in regional innovation activities: spatial evidence from China," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 396-419.
    13. Hassan Hakimian, 1998. "From East to West Asia: Lessons of Globalization, Crisis and Economic Reform," Working Papers 82, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK, revised 2000.
    14. Prakash Kumar Shrestha, 2013. "Economic development in South and East Asia: empirical examination of East Asian Development Model," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 20(2), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Jonathan Temple, 1997. "St Adam and the Dragons: Neo-classical economics and the East Asian miracle," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 279-300.
    16. Yanrui Wu, 2008. "The role of productivity in China's growth: new estimates," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 141-156.
    17. Sadequl Islam, 1996. "Persistence of economic growth and its determinants: some evidence for South Korea and India," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 53-54.
    18. Wu, Harry X., 2011. "Rethinking China.s Path of Industrialization," WIDER Working Paper Series 076, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Keun Lee & Justin Y. Lin & Ha-Joon Chang, 2000. "Late Marketization versus Late Industrialization in East Asia: Convergence and Divergence among Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China, Vietnam, & Mongolia," Working Paper Series no37, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.
    20. Séverine Blaise, 2009. "Japanese Aid as a Prerequisite for FDI : The Case of Southeast Asian Countries," Finance Working Papers 22767, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • L70 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - General
    • L78 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Government Policy
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • L70 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - General
    • L78 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Government Policy
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:313978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieaaauk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.