IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/126.html

A Comment on "Kin Networks and Institutional Development"

Author

Listed:
  • Degroot, Jean
  • Gobbi, Paula E.
  • Ramos, Alejandra
  • Wei, Xinyu

Abstract

Schulz (2022) shows how weak kin networks contributed to the rise of participatory institutions and how the medieval Catholic Church marriage regulations prohibitions contributed to the process by destroying European clan-based kin networks. Three pieces of evidence construct the argument. First, a cross-country level analysis shows that countries with cousin-term differentiation score between 2.83 and 7.66 units less in modern democracy than non-differentiating countries. The point estimates are statistically significant at the 5% level using Conley SEs either at the genetic distance or geographical distance level. Second, a historical analysis shows that one additional century of exposure to the Western Church increased the probability of a city being a commune by 12.2 and is statistically significant at the 1% level using Conley SEs with distance cutoffs of 500km or 2,500 km. Third, a 20th century analysis of voter turnover and kin network within European countries shows that doubling cousin marriage rate decreases the probability to vote by about 1.8 percentage points. Following an epidemiological approach that links the kin-network of migrant mothers country of origin to the second-generation migrant's political participation in Europe, Schulz (2022) shows that cousin-term differentiation in the country of origin of the second-generation migrant mother reduces the probability of voting. The above results are all computationally reproducible. We only identify two minor coding errors: the SE in reported in Table 3 correspond to SE clustered at the city level rather than Conley SE, and the sample size in Table 5 is incorrect. None of the errors affects the point estimates or their statistical significance. We also provide the missing code for the two figures in the paper. For the historical analysis, we conduct a robustness check on alternative sample of cities. The magnitude of the coefficients exhibits a very small variation and statistical significance of the results remains unchanged.

Suggested Citation

  • Degroot, Jean & Gobbi, Paula E. & Ramos, Alejandra & Wei, Xinyu, 2024. "A Comment on "Kin Networks and Institutional Development"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 126, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/296191/1/I4R-DP126.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan F Schulz, 2022. "Kin Networks and Institutional Development," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(647), pages 2578-2613.
    2. Maarten Bosker & Eltjo Buringh & Jan Luiten van Zanden, 2013. "From Baghdad to London: Unraveling Urban Development in Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa, 800–1800," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(4), pages 1418-1437, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huning, Thilo R. & Wahl, Fabian, 2017. "Lord of the lemons: Origin and dynamics of state capacity," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 22-2017, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    2. Fabian Wahl, 2014. "Origins of Political Change Ñ The Case of Late Medieval Guild Revolts," Working Papers 0069, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    3. Geng Niu & Yi Wang & Yang Zhou & Xu Gan, 2024. "Family ties and corporate tax avoidance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(8), pages 976-996, October.
    4. Shuhei Kitamura & Nils-Petter Lagerlöf, 2025. "Battles and Capitals," ISER Discussion Paper 1290, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    5. Roberto Ezcurra, 2025. "Kin-based institutions and women’s political empowerment," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 42(3), pages 745-770, October.
    6. Raffaele Danna & Martina Iori & Andrea Mina, 2022. "A Numerical Revolution: The diffusion of practical mathematics and the growth of pre-modern European economies," LEM Papers Series 2022/18, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    7. Rafael González‐Val, 2019. "Historical urban growth in Europe (1300–1800)," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(2), pages 1115-1136, April.
    8. Fabian Siuda & Uwe Sunde, 2021. "Disease and demographic development: the legacy of the plague," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-30, March.
    9. Léonard Guillou & Lou Safra & Nicolas Baumard, 2023. "Using portraits to quantify the changes of generalized social trust in European history: A replication study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Mark Koyama, 2024. "Analyzing the medieval church through an economic lens," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 53-60, October.
    11. Beltràn Tapia, F. & Díez-Minguela, A. & Martínez-Galarraga, J., 2017. "The Shadow of Cities: Size, Location and the Spatial Distribution of Population in Spain," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1749, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:bfy52_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jakob Vanschoonbeek, 2024. "The Spatial Political Economy of Discontent," Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics 750408, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics.
    14. Chaney, Eric, 2020. "Modern Library Holdings and Historic City Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 14686, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Mattia Balestra & Giulio Cainelli & Roberto Ganau & Nadiia Matsiuk & Mario Pasquato & Roberto Pierdicca, 2025. "Sovereignty, Civic Capital, and Local Development. A Historical Perspective in Economic Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2504, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2025.
    16. Barber, Luke & Jetter, Michael & Krieger, Tim, 2024. "Foreshadowing Mars: Religiosity and pre-Enlightenment conflict in Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302355, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Francesco Cinnirella & Alireza Naghavi & Giovanni Prarolo, 2023. "Islam and human capital in historical Spain," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 225-257, June.
    18. Millemaci, Emanuele & Monteforte, Fabio & Temple, Jonathan R.W., 2025. "Electing for stability: Democracy and output volatility, 1960-2019," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    19. Veselov, Dmitry & Yarkin, Alexander, 2024. "Lobbying for Industrialization: Theory and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 17045, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Becker, Sascha O. & Ferrara, Andreas & Melander, Eric & Pascali, Luigi, 2018. "Wars, Local Political Institutions, and Fiscal Capacity: Evidence from Six Centuries of German History," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 395, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    21. Xie, Wenyu & Yin, Weijun & Tu, Dorothy, 2025. "Invisible handcuffs: Nepotism culture and SMEs’ innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.