IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hsgmed/202501.html

Causal Effects and Optimal Policy Learning for Intensive Care Unit Discharge Decisions to Solve Hospital Process Bottlenecks: Approach, Methods, and First Results

Author

Listed:
  • Vogel, Justus
  • Cordier, Johannes
  • Filipovic, Miodrag

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) operate with fixed capacities and face uncertainty such as demand variability, leading to demand-driven, early discharges to free up beds. These discharges can increase ICU readmission rates, negatively impacting patient outcomes and aggravating ICU bottleneck congestion. This study investigates how ICU discharge timing affects readmission risk, with the goal of developing policies that minimize ICU readmissions, managing demand variability and bed capacity. To define a binary treatment, we randomly assign hypothetical discharge days to patients, comparing these with actual discharge days to form intervention and control groups. We apply two causal machine learning techniques (generalized random forest, modified causal forest). Assuming unconfoundedness, we leverage observed patient data as sufficient covariates. For scenarios where unconfoundedness might fail, we discuss an IV approach with different instruments. We further develop decision policies based on individualized average treatment effects (IATEs) to minimize individual patients’ readmission risk. Our sample comprises 12,950 ICU stays (11,873 unique cases) from the Department of Surgical Intensive Medicine of the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen admitted between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2023. We find that for 72% of our sample discharge at point in time š‘” as compared to š‘”+1 increases patients’ readmission risk. Vice versa, 28% of cases profit from an earlier discharge in terms of readmission risk. The range of IATEs is quite large: For 91.4% of ICU stays, an earlier ICU discharge changes a patient’s readmission risk between -0.05 and 0.05 percentage points (-55% and 55% relative change as compared to the average readmission rate of 9.04%). To develop decision policies, we will exploit this treatment heterogeneity and rank patients according to their IATEs and compare IATEs of optimal and actual discharges across all decision points in our observation period. Finally, we outline how we will assess the potential reduction in readmissions and saved bed capacities under optimal policies in a simulation, offering actionable insights for ICU management. We aim to provide a novel approach and blueprint for similar operations research and management science applications in data-rich environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Vogel, Justus & Cordier, Johannes & Filipovic, Miodrag, 2025. "Causal Effects and Optimal Policy Learning for Intensive Care Unit Discharge Decisions to Solve Hospital Process Bottlenecks: Approach, Methods, and First Results," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2025-01, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management, revised 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/308439.2/1/wps-2025-01_v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    2. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2017. "The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 3-32, Spring.
    3. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jochen Gönsch & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2021. "Managing admission and discharge processes in intensive care units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 666-685, December.
    4. Susan Athey & Guido Imbens, 2019. "Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About," Papers 1903.10075, arXiv.org.
    5. Yao Cui & Andrew M. Davis, 2022. "Tax-Induced Inequalities in the Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7202-7220, October.
    6. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Jay K. Satia & Roy E. Lave, 1973. "Markovian Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Probabilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 728-740, June.
    8. J. K. Satia & R. E. Lave, 1973. "Markovian Decision Processes with Probabilistic Observation of States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Fern'andez-Lor'ia & Foster Provost & Jesse Anderton & Benjamin Carterette & Praveen Chandar, 2020. "A Comparison of Methods for Treatment Assignment with an Application to Playlist Generation," Papers 2004.11532, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    2. Aysegül Kayaoglu & Ghassan Baliki & Tilman Brück & Melodie Al Daccache & Dorothee Weiffen, 2023. "How to conduct impact evaluations in humanitarian and conflict settings," HiCN Working Papers 387, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Michael C Knaus, 2022. "Double machine learning-based programme evaluation under unconfoundedness [Econometric methods for program evaluation]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 602-627.
    4. Yamin Ahmad & Adam Check & Ming Chien Lo, 2024. "Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Time Series: A Comparison of Classical, Bayesian and Machine Learning Approaches," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2139-2173, June.
    5. Goller, Daniel & Lechner, Michael & Pongratz, Tamara & Wolff, Joachim, 2025. "Active labor market policies for the long-term unemployed: New evidence from causal machine learning," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Anna Baiardi & Andrea A. Naghi, 2021. "The Value Added of Machine Learning to Causal Inference: Evidence from Revisited Studies," Papers 2101.00878, arXiv.org.
    7. Anna Baiardi & Andrea A. Naghi, 2021. "The Value Added of Machine Learning to Causal Inference: Evidence from Revisited Studies," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-001/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2024. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Papers 2405.00161, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:8nsw4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Raval, Devesh & Rosenbaum, Ted & Wilson, Nathan E., 2021. "How do machine learning algorithms perform in predicting hospital choices? evidence from changing environments," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Harsh Parikh & Carlos Varjao & Louise Xu & Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2022. "Validating Causal Inference Methods," Papers 2202.04208, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    12. Carlos FernƔndez-Lorƭa & Foster Provost & Jesse Anderton & Benjamin Carterette & Praveen Chandar, 2023. "A Comparison of Methods for Treatment Assignment with an Application to Playlist Generation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 786-803, June.
    13. Netta Barak‐Corren & Yoav Kan‐Tor & Nelson Tebbe, 2022. "Examining the effects of antidiscrimination laws on children in the foster care and adoption systems," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 1003-1066, December.
    14. Gabriel Okasa & Kenneth A. Younge, 2022. "Sample Fit Reliability," Papers 2209.06631, arXiv.org.
    15. Gabriel Okasa, 2022. "Meta-Learners for Estimation of Causal Effects: Finite Sample Cross-Fit Performance," Papers 2201.12692, arXiv.org.
    16. Lechner, Michael, 2018. "Modified Causal Forests for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 12040, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Keola, Souknilanh & Silaphet, Korrakoun & Yamanouchi, Kenta, 2022. "Estimating the impacts of international bridges on foreign firm locations: a machine learning approach," IDE Discussion Papers 847, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    19. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    20. Augusto Cerqua & Roberta Di Stefano & Raffaele Mattera, 2024. "Heterogeneous Responses to Continuous Treatments: A Cluster-Based Causal Framework," Papers 2409.08773, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    21. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP54/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://med.unisg.ch/de/forschung/management-im-gesundheitswesen .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.