IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esrepo/65869.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Map of Policies Supporting Thermal Efficiency in Germany’s Residential Building Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Amecke, Hermann
  • Neuhoff, Karsten

Abstract

Executive Summary The German government aims to reduce primary energy demand by 80% until 2050 and heating demand by 20% until 2020. Besides the need for additional efforts to achieve these targets, Germany has already implemented a set of policies and programmes to increase investments in thermal energy efficiency. This paper provides an overview of currently implemented German policies, specifically addressing two questions: A) What roles do different types of policies play in supporting energy efficiency in the residential building sector and how do they interact? B) In Germany, which policies fulfil these roles? How do they perform? The report covers all main federal policies in Germany and reviews the current literature on the impact of the individual policy tools. The following summarizes the paper’s key points: A) What roles do different types of policies play in supporting thermal energy efficiency investments and how do they interact? There are three key categories of energy efficiency policies for buildings in Germany: i) financial instruments to improve the economics of thermal energy efficiency measures, ii) information instruments to highlight advantages and options for investing into energy efficiency, and iii) standards mandating performance requirements. Interactions among these policies impact their overall effectiveness. Building policies are complementary because they fulfil different roles and respond to different needs; a single program is often not effective without the support of other mechanisms. For instance, for a loan or financing instrument to work, information instruments are needed to communicate the additional savings they offer. Applications to a programme with the same financial benefits can be increased manifold by alterations to the information provided. Equally, financial support programs increase the interest in and relevance of information instruments to building owners. Besides the needs for a balanced policy mix, some policies can also act as substitutes to each other. Energy demand reductions can, for example, be either triggered by enhancing the profitability of energy efficiency technologies through financial support or by compulsory performance standards, depending on the policy preference of a government. B) In Germany, which policies fulfil these roles? How do they perform? Note: The charts below for each type of policy list key policies in Germany. Detailed descriptions of each policy are found in this paper. I. Financial policies improve the economics of investments by addressing different needs and preferences of building owners. The following chart lists German policies that improve the economics of energy performance investments by either providing access to preferential finance or upfront support, changing heating costs, or aligning incentives. A diversity of financial support mechanisms is suggested to increase the impact of financial support because different actors prefer and/or need different support mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Amecke, Hermann & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2011. "Map of Policies Supporting Thermal Efficiency in Germany’s Residential Building Sector," EconStor Research Reports 65869, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esrepo:65869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/65869/1/Policy-Map.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten & Bartiaux, Francoise & Michael Jensen, Ole & Cantaert, Madeleine, 2007. "Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2879-2888, May.
    2. Amecke, Hermann, 2011. "The Effectiveness of Energy Performance Certificates - Evidence from Germany," EconStor Research Reports 65874, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Stefan Bach, 2009. "Zehn Jahre ökologische Steuerreform: finanzpolitisch erfolgreich, klimapolitisch halbherzig," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 76(14), pages 218-227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tilmann Rave & Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2013. "Koordination von Innovations-, Energie- und Umweltpolitik," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 61, October.
    2. Zimny, Jacek & Michalak, Piotr & Szczotka, Krzysztof, 2015. "Polish heat pump market between 2000 and 2013: European background, current state and development prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 791-812.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    2. Novikova, Aleksandra & Amecke, Hermann & Neuhoff, Karsten & Stelmakh, Kateryna & Kiss, Bernadett & Rohde, Clemens & Dunkelberg, Elisa & Matschoss, Kaisa & Darby, Sarah, 2011. "Informationsinstrumente zur Förderung von Energieeinsparungen im Wohngebäudebestand," EconStor Research Reports 65867, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    4. Alex Gonzalez Caceres, 2018. "Shortcomings and Suggestions to the EPC Recommendation List of Measures: In-Depth Interviews in Six Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Thomas Leoni & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2020. "Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten und Finanzierungsvarianten. Bisherige Erkenntnisse und internationale Reformbeispiele," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66851, April.
    6. Roeder, Kerstin & Habla, Wolfgang, 2012. "The Political Sustainability of Germany's Environmental Tax Rate," VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century 62060, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Felipe Encinas & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte & Carlos Aguirre-Nuñez & Francisco Vergara-Perucich, 2020. "When Residential Energy Labeling Becomes Irrelevant: Sustainability vs. Profitability in the Liberalized Chilean Property Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Pier Basaglia & Sophie Behr & Moritz A. Drupp, 2023. "De-Fueling Externalities: How Tax Salience and Fuel Substitution Mediate Climate and Health Benefits," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2041, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Amecke, Hermann, 2011. "The Effectiveness of Energy Performance Certificates - Evidence from Germany," EconStor Research Reports 65874, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Ekins, Paul & Lees, Eoin, 2008. "The impact of EU policies on energy use in and the evolution of the UK built environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4580-4583, December.
    11. Pier Basaglia & Sophie M. Behr & Moritz A. Drupp, 2023. "De-Fueling Externalities: Causal Effects of Fuel Taxation and Mediating Mechanisms for Reducing Climate and Pollution Costs," CESifo Working Paper Series 10508, CESifo.
    12. Grottera, Carolina & Barbier, Carine & Sanches-Pereira, Alessandro & Abreu, Mariana Weiss de & Uchôa, Christiane & Tudeschini, Luís Gustavo & Cayla, Jean-Michel & Nadaud, Franck & Pereira Jr, Amaro Ol, 2018. "Linking electricity consumption of home appliances and standard of living: A comparison between Brazilian and French households," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 877-888.
    13. Melo, A.P. & Cóstola, D. & Lamberts, R. & Hensen, J.L.M., 2014. "Development of surrogate models using artificial neural network for building shell energy labelling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 457-466.
    14. Djuric, Natasa & Novakovic, Vojislav, 2009. "Review of possibilities and necessities for building lifetime commissioning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 486-492, February.
    15. Daniel Feser & Till Proeger, 2017. "Asymmetric information as a barrier to knowledge spillovers in expert markets," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 211-232, March.
    16. Tilmann Rave & Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2013. "Koordination von Innovations-, Energie- und Umweltpolitik," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 61.
    17. Habla, Wolfgang & Roeder, Kerstin, 2017. "The political economy of mitigation and adaptation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 239-257.
    18. Peter Morris & Laurie Buys & Desley Vine, 2014. "Moving from Outsider to Insider: Peer Status and Partnerships between Electricity Utilities and Residential Consumers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    19. Kerr, N. & Winskel, M., 2020. "Household investment in home energy retrofit: A review of the evidence on effective public policy design for privately owned homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Jia, Ling & Qian, Queena K. & Meijer, Frits & Visscher, Henk, 2021. "How information stimulates homeowners’ cooperation in residential building energy retrofits in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Policy mix; energy efficiency;

    JEL classification:

    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esrepo:65869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.