IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/142009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Auswirkungen der Organisation und der Außenorientierung von Dienstleistungen auf Innovationen

Author

Listed:
  • Lay, Gunter
  • Brandt, Tasso
  • Maloca, Spomenka
  • Schröter, Marcus
  • Stahlecker, Thomas

Abstract

Innovationen sind ein zentrales Element zur Erhaltung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Deutschlands in einer globalisierten Weltwirtschaft. Waren die Innovationsanstrengungen von Wirtschaft und Politik in der Vergangenheit vorrangig darauf ausgerichtet, auf Forschung und Entwicklung basierende technologische Produktinnovationen voranzubringen, so hat sich mittlerweile die Erkenntnis durchgesetzt, dass ein breiteres Innovationsverständnis vonnöten ist: Prozessinnovationen, organisatorische Innovationen und Dienstleistungsinnovationen sind Innovationsfelder, die in der Innovationsforschung zunehmend Beachtung finden. Insbesondere Dienstleistungsinnovationen sind dabei in ihrem Zustandekommen und in ihren Wirkungsweisen jedoch noch keineswegs hinreichend untersucht. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat die Expertenkommission "Forschung und Innovation (EFI)" in ihrem ersten Gutachten (2008) vorgeschlagen, die Erforschung innovativer Dienstleistungen zu forcieren. Einen Beitrag hierzu will die vorliegende, von der EFI Kommission in Auftrag gegebene explorative Studie leisten.

Suggested Citation

  • Lay, Gunter & Brandt, Tasso & Maloca, Spomenka & Schröter, Marcus & Stahlecker, Thomas, 2009. "Auswirkungen der Organisation und der Außenorientierung von Dienstleistungen auf Innovationen," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 14-2009, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:142009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/156528/1/StuDIS_2009-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attila Varga & Hans Schalk, 2004. "Knowledge Spillovers, Agglomeration and Macroeconomic Growth: An Empirical Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 977-989.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schasse, Ulrich & Schiller, Daniel & Leidmann, M. & Eckl, V. & Grave, Barbara S. & Kladroba, Andreas & Stenke, G., 2016. "Die Rolle von FuE-Dienstleistern im deutschen Innovationssystem," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos Genakos & Ioannis Kaplanis & Maria Theano Tagaraki & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "Firm Resilience and Growth during the Economics Crisis: lessons from the Greek depression," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 186, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    2. André Stel & Kashifa Suddle, 2008. "The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 31-47, January.
    3. Mikhail Martynovich, 2017. "The role of local embeddedness and non-local knowledge in entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 741-762, December.
    4. Pamela Mueller, 2005. "Exploring the Knowledge Filter - How Entrepreneurship and University-Industry Relations Drive Economic Growth," ERSA conference papers ersa05p610, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2016. "Innovation modes and entrepreneurial behavioral characteristics in regional growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 875-893, December.
    6. Ren Lu & Ruikan Zhang & Torger Reve, 2013. "Relations among Clusters in Six Chinese City Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1189-1209, August.
    7. Jahn, Vera & Berlemann, Michael, 2014. "Governance, Firm Size and Innovative Capacity: Regional Empirical Evidence for Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100412, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Dmitry Yu. Evdokimov & Yury Yu. Ponomarev, 2022. "Development of Charging Infrastructure in the Russian Regions: A Scenario Analysis [Развитие Электрозаправочной Инфраструктуры В Регионах России: Сценарный Анализ]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 11, pages 59-76, November.
    9. Enrico Santarelli & Marco Vivarelli, 2007. "Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(3), pages 455-488, June.
    10. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2016. "Relevance and utility of European Union research, technological development and innovation policies for a smart growth," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(1), pages 52-72, February.
    11. Christos, Genakos & Kaplanis, Ioannis & Tagaraki, Maria Theano & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2023. "Firm resilience and growth during the economics crisis: lessons from the Greek depression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119705, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Torben Klarl, 2011. "A Spatial related Note on Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," ERSA conference papers ersa11p278, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Elekes, Zoltán, 2016. "A regionális növekedés új tényezői az evolúciós gazdaságföldrajzi kutatásokban. A változatosság és a technológiai közelség [The new factors of regional growth in research into evolutionary economic," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 307-329.
    14. Shu-Heng Chen & Bin-Tzong Chie & Tong Zhang, 2015. "Network-Based Trust Games: An Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(3), pages 1-5.
    15. G. Page West III & Charles E. Bamford & Jesse W. Marsden, 2008. "Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Developments in Less-Developed Latin American Markets: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory," Discussion Paper Series 2008-03, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte.
    16. Darja Reuschke, 2011. "Self-Employment and Geographical Mobility in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 417, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    17. Attila Varga & Péter Járosi & Tamás Sebestyén, 2011. "Modeling the growth effects of regional knowledge production: The GMR-Europe model and its applications for EU Framework Program policy impact simulations," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1426, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Shulin Wan & Weixin Luan & Qiaoqiao Lin, 2021. "Industry linkage, spatial correlation, and city exports: case study of the textile and clothing export industry in China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(1), pages 91-112, February.
    19. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Marco Solazzi, 2012. "A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university–industry research collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 955-975, June.
    20. Liu, Xielin & Ji, Xiaohui & Ge, Shuang, 2024. "Does the complexity and embeddedness of knowledge recombination contribute to economic development? —— Observations from prefecture cities in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:142009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.