IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Work Design Practices: Do Trade Unions Make a Difference?

Listed author(s):
  • Tomislav Hernaus


    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb)

  • Ana Aleksić


    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb)

  • Ivana Marić


    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb)

Work design and implementation of various work design practices can be constrained or fostered by various factors, among which trade unions should be considered as an important one. Research conducted among large-sized Croatian companies shows that it is possible to recognize significant differences among union- and non-union organizations regarding the use of innovative work design practices. Independent samples t-test revealed that non-union organizations use flexible working arrangements more extensively than their unionized counterparts. Additionally, traditional job design strategies and teamwork practices are also more represented within non-unionized work setting. Research findings clearly indicate how trade unions have a significant impact on the implementation of different work design practices. In other words, their influence on work design practice should not be neglected.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 2012
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb in its series EFZG Working Papers Series with number 1204.

in new window

Length: 11
Date of creation: 01 Sep 2012
Handle: RePEc:zag:wpaper:1204
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Trg J.F.Kennedya 6, 10000 Zagreb

Phone: +385 1 233-5633
Fax: +385 1 238-3333
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Gallagher, William E, Jr & Einhorn, Hillel J, 1976. "Motivation Theory and Job Design," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(3), pages 358-373, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:wpaper:1204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (WPS)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.