IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yon/wpaper/2025rwp-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Monopoly Data Sales over Information-Sharing Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Jihwan Do

    (Yonsei University)

  • Lining Han

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xiaoxi Li

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

This paper studies the monopoly data seller's problem when users are connected through an information-sharing network. When users' prior information is sufficiently noisy, the seller's optimal strategy targets a maximum independent set - the largest subset of users with no direct links. In this regime, data precision falls as the network becomes denser, yet we show - using the Caro-Wei bound, a classical result in graph theory - that it remains strictly above the socially efficient level in most networks. Further, any core-periphery network is Pareto-efficient, and any Pareto-efficient network exhibits a quasi-core-periphery structure. When users can coordinate network formation, the resulting equilibrium network also takes this form. Finally, we quantify the value of network information by comparing the seller profit to that with a misbelief.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihwan Do & Lining Han & Xiaoxi Li, 2025. "Monopoly Data Sales over Information-Sharing Networks," Working papers 2025rwp-249, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2025rwp-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://121.254.254.220/repec/yon/wpaper/2025rwp-249.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Admati, Anat R. & Pfleiderer, Paul, 1986. "A monopolistic market for information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 400-438, August.
    2. Ozsoylev, Han N. & Walden, Johan, 2011. "Asset pricing in large information networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(6), pages 2252-2280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bing Han & Liyan Yang, 2013. "Social Networks, Information Acquisition, and Asset Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1444-1457, June.
    2. Manela, Asaf, 2014. "The value of diffusing information," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 181-199.
    3. Han, Rui-Qi & Li, Ming-Xia & Chen, Wei & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2019. "Structural properties of statistically validated empirical information networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 747-756.
    4. Jhinyoung Shin & Rajdeep Singh, 2010. "Corporate Disclosures: Strategic Donation of Information," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 313-337, September.
    5. Gabriel Desgranges & Celine Rochon, 2008. "Conformism, Public News and Market Effciency," OFRC Working Papers Series 2008fe16, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    6. Goldman, Eitan & Martel, Jordan & Schneemeier, Jan, 2022. "A theory of financial media," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 239-258.
    7. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Ioannis Vrontos & Petros Dellaportas & Serge Galam, 2014. "Communication impacting financial markets," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00982959, HAL.
    8. Xu, Weijun & Pan, Shiliang & Ji, Yucheng & Zhao, Qi, 2023. "Public disclosure with information sharing in financial market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Huan Liu & Weiqi Liu & Yi Li, 2022. "Private Information Dissemination and Noise Trading: Implications for Price Efficiency and Market Liquidity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. De Silva, Dakshina G. & Gertsberg, Marina & Kosmopoulou, Georgia & Pownall, Rachel A.J., 2022. "Evolution of a dealer trading network and its effects on art auction prices," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Bryan Kelly & Alexander Ljungqvist, 2012. "Testing Asymmetric-Information Asset Pricing Models," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(5), pages 1366-1413.
    12. Shiyang Huang & Yan Xiong & Liyan Yang, 2022. "Skill Acquisition and Data Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6116-6144, August.
    13. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Yutaka Kayaba & Jun Maekawa & Hitoshi Matsushima, 2021. "Trading Information Goods on a Network: An Experiment," ISER Discussion Paper 1151, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    14. Lou, Youcheng & Wang, Shouyang, 2020. "A new approach to the existence and regularity of linear equilibrium in a noisy rational expectations economy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 119-126.
    15. Cathline Augustiani & Lorenzo Casavecchia & Jack Gray, 2015. "Managerial Sharing, Mutual Fund Connections, and Performance," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 427-455, September.
    16. Markus Christen, 2005. "Research Note---Cost Uncertainty Is Bliss: The Effect of Competition on the Acquisition of Cost Information for Pricing New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 668-676, April.
    17. Bruno Biais & Thierry Foucault, 1993. "Asymétrie d’information et marchés financiers : une synthèse de la littérature récente," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 69(1), pages 8-44.
    18. Pedersen, Lasse Heje, 2022. "Game on: Social networks and markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 1097-1119.
    19. Ana Babus & Péter Kondor, 2018. "Trading and Information Diffusion in Over‐the‐Counter Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(5), pages 1727-1769, September.
    20. Arlindo Skenderaj, 2025. "Selling supplemental information," Papers 2511.14103, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2025rwp-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: YERI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eryonkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.