The 'Dutch Miracle': Employment Growth in a Retrenched but Still Generous Welfare System
The Netherlands, until the mid-1980s a country with high unemployment, has seen rising employment for some years. Currently its unemployment rate is below five per cent. Employment growth is mostly due to the expansion of part-time jobs, particularly for women. Because there are many people in disability and early retirement schemes, unemployment is, however, still high. A special feature is that the Dutch have managed to bring down unemployment in a context of a welfare system which is still relatively generous. There have been cuts, but the Dutch poverty rate is still one of the lowest in the world. The most frequently advanced explanation for this ‘miracle’ is the wage restraint the unions accepted for more than a decade within the framework of the Dutch corporatist institutions. Looking at other low unemployment/high employment countries, however, one can doubt that this explanation is valid. The causes of the Dutch development are probably more complex, and perhaps include sharply rising house prices and the right of tax reduction through mortgage payments, an opportunity the Dutch people have used very extensively in recent years. By doing this they have raised purchasing power more than it was reduced by wage restraint.
|Date of creation:||May 1999|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Sydney 2052|
Phone: +61 2 9385 3833
Fax: +61 2 9385 1049
Web page: http://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/dp/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Headey, Bruce & Goodin, Robert E. & Muffels, Ruud & Dirven, Henk-Jan, 1997. "Welfare Over Time: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in Panel Perspective," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(03), pages 329-359, September.
- Peter Kreisler & Joseph Halevi, 1995. "Corporatism in Australia," Discussion Papers 0057, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:0099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.