IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa13p544.html

Knowledge transfer via cooperative research - How Universities and Universities of Applied Science are positioned in the German research network

Author

Listed:
  • Falk Strotebeck

Abstract

Main tasks of academia are to create new knowledge and to transfer that knowledge into the economy. Regarding this work, four channels of knowledge transfer are considered (based on Hamm et al, 2012): (1) basic transfer e.g. publications, (2) human capital e.g. graduates, (3) formation of enterprises, in this case spin offs and (4) via research, e.g. especially cooperative research. The question to be answered is: How do the different channels through which the knowledge is meant to flow into the economy vary regarding different types of academia? Regarding the German higher education system especially two types of academia can be differentiated. These are the universities on the one hand and the universities of applied science on the other hand. These different types of higher education institutions (HEI) in Germany show distinctive characteristics, e.g. more application oriented versus research oriented teaching, personnel structure (more research assistance in universities) etc. Regarding the transfer of knowledge two questions (which are interwoven) arise: (1) Does the intensity of transfer vary between the different HEI types? (2) Is the spatial distribution of knowledge different, regarding the two diverging types of HEIs? While in this work only a few things will be said about the channels one to three, the focus is on the fourth channel: knowledge transfer via research. Using data from the 'FÖKAT' (the 'Förderkatalog' of the German Ministry of Education and Research) a research network between companies, institutions and academia is unveiled. This online catalog contains about 110000 data set entries of direct project funding of the German government. The analyzed data in this work is restricted to all currently ongoing projects. The resulting set of data contains 22722 data set entries which include information on cooperative and non-cooperative projects. 5966 cooperative projects are counted. These are the ones used to unveil the network which in the end includes institutional research facilities, companies and academia. Using centrality measures such as degree, closeness and betweenness the position of the different HEI types within the network can be measured and compared. Degree-centrality can be used to observe cooperative activity, as it measures the number of direct linkages. Closeness-centrality uses the information on the average path length to every other actor within the network. This way a high closeness-centrality can be used as an indicator for inheriting a position with good access to new knowledge and/or a position which can be used to give impulses to the network that reach all other actors fast. Lastly the betweenness-centrality can be used as an indicator for control options within the network, in terms of knowledge brokerage. It can be observed that the centrality measures are significantly higher for universities than for universities of applied science.

Suggested Citation

  • Falk Strotebeck, 2013. "Knowledge transfer via cooperative research - How Universities and Universities of Applied Science are positioned in the German research network," ERSA conference papers ersa13p544, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00544.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Cooke & Carla De Laurentis & Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2007. "Regional Knowledge Economies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3957.
    2. Stoetzer, Matthias-Wolfgang & Krähmer, Christian, 2007. "Regionale Nachfrageeffekte der Hochschulen - methodische Probleme und Ergebnisse empirischer Untersuchungen für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland," Jena Contributions to Economic Research 2007,6, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena – University of Applied Sciences, Department of Business Administration.
    3. Broström, Anders, 2010. "Working with distant researchers--Distance and content in university-industry interaction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1311-1320, December.
    4. Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder & Schmoch, Ulrich, 1998. "Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 835-851, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Falk Strotebeck, 2014. "Running with the pack? The role of Universities of applied science in a German research network," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 34(2), pages 139-156, October.
    2. Gianluca Murgia, 2021. "The impact of collaboration diversity and joint experience on the reiteration of university co-patents," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1108-1143, August.
    3. De Fuentes, Claudia & Dutrénit, Gabriela, 2012. "Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1666-1682.
    4. Hayashi, Takayuki, 2003. "Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1421-1442, September.
    5. David Grosse Kathoefer & Jens Leker, 2012. "Knowledge transfer in academia: an exploratory study on the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 658-675, October.
    6. Paula Susana Figueiredo Moutinho & Margarida Fontes & Manuel Mira Godinho, 2007. "Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 355-377, February.
    7. Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI & Qiuhan ZHAO, 2023. "University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation," Discussion papers 23027, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Bodas Freitas , Isabel Maria & Geuna, Aldo & Lawson, Cornelia & Rossi, Federica, 2014. "How Industry Inventors Collaborate with Academic Researchers: The choice between shared and unilateral governance forms," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201401, University of Turin.
    9. Mitze, Timo & Strotebeck, Falk, 2017. "Modeling interregional research collaborations in German biotechnology using industry directory data: A quantitative social network analysis," MPRA Paper 83392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Magerman, Tom & Looy, Bart Van & Debackere, Koenraad, 2015. "Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one’s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1702-1713.
    11. Chen, Guanghua & Yang, Guoliang & He, Feng & Chen, Kaihua, 2019. "Exploring the effect of political borders on university-industry collaborative research performance: Evidence from China’s Guangdong province," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 58-69.
    12. Bekkers, Rudi & Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria, 2008. "Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1837-1853, December.
    13. Christoph Markmann & Alexander Spickermann & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Improving the question formulation in Delphi‐like surveys: Analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    14. Hoppmann, Joern, 2021. "Hand in hand to Nowhereland? How the resource dependence of research institutes influences their co-evolution with industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    15. Basse Mama, Houdou, 2018. "Nonlinear capital market payoffs to science-led innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1084-1095.
    16. Eileen M. Trauth & Michael DiRaimo Jr. & M. Richard Hoover Jr. & Paul Hallacher, 2015. "Leveraging a Research University for New Economy Capacity Building in a Rural Industrial Region," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(3), pages 229-244, August.
    17. Baier, Jessica, 2022. "From a materially produced to a socially constituted space: A proposal for a new research perspective on public service provision and infrastructures in rural areas based on a relational theory of space," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 75-86, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    18. Becker Wolfgang & Peters Jürgen, 2005. "Innovation Effects of Science-Related Technological Opportunities / Innovationseffekte von technologischen Möglichkeiten aus dem Wissenschaftsbereich: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings for Firms in the German Manufacturing Industry / ," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 225(2), pages 130-150, April.
    19. Nicola Bellini & Jukka Teras & Hakan Ylinenpaa, 2012. "Science and Technology Parks in the Age of Open Innovation. The Finnish Case," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 1 Innovat, pages 25-44.
    20. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.