IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa03p153.html

The Evolution of Reforestation in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Bacha

Abstract

This paper analyzes the evolution of reforestation in Brazil and makes an evaluation of federal government policies used to stimulate that activity. Despite the huge increase of reforestation areas in Brazil since the 1970s, what put up Brazil as the sixth large country with reforested areas, a scarcity of roundwood from reforested areas is happing in that country during the first decade of the 21st century. Federal government implemented three programs to foster the reforestation in Brazil during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. However, nothing was implemented during the 1990s, when demand of roundwood increased, but not its production. This paper analyzes those programs, using a traditional cost-benefit approach. The results of that evaluation are used to suggest new federal government policies to foster the enlargement of reforestation in segments where price mechanism has not working well.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Bacha, 2003. "The Evolution of Reforestation in Brazil," ERSA conference papers ersa03p153, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa03p153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/153.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger N. Rose, 1980. "Supply Shifts and Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 834-837.
    2. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. de Wit, Marc & Junginger, Martin & Faaij, André, 2013. "Learning in dedicated wood production systems: Past trends, future outlook and implications for bioenergy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 417-432.
    3. Thi Kim Phung Dang & Mariëlle Zouwen & Bas Arts, 2019. "Challenges of Forest Governance: the Case of Forest Rehabilitation in Vietnam," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 425-452, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    3. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    4. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2009. "Sensitivity of welfare effects estimated by equilibrium displacement model: a biological productivity growth for semi-subsistence crop in Sub-Sahara African market with high transactions costs," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49287, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. J. M. Alston & J. D. Mullen, 1992. "Economic Effects Of Research Into Traded Goods: The Case Of Australian Wool," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 268-278, May.
    7. Pannell, David J. & Morrison, David A., 1994. "Towards a Decision Support System for Economic Evaluation of Agricultural Research," 1994 Conference (38th), February 8-10, 1994, Wellington, New Zealand 148530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Brennan, John P. & Aw-Hassan, Aden & Quade, Kathryn J. & Nordblom, Thomas L., 2002. "Impact of ICARDA Research on Australian Agriculture," Research Reports 28012, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    9. Davis, Jeff & Bantilan, Ma Cynthia S. & Nedumaran, Swanikannu & Charyulu, Deevi Kumara, 2014. "The importance of disaggregation for understanding research impacts and modelling adoption," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165820, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. George Verikios, 2006. "Understanding the World Wool Market: Trade, Productivity and Grower Incomes. Part 5: Relative Returns to Australian Wool Producers of On- and Off-Farm Research," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-23, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    11. T. J. P. Voon, 1992. "A Cross‐Commodity Appraisal Of Demand‐Raising Research Benefits: Pork And Chicken In Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 243-247, May.
    12. Miller, Gay & Rosenblatt, Joseph & Hushak, Leroy, "undated". "The Effects Of Supply Shifts On Producers Surplus," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270116, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. John W. Freebairn, 1992. "Evaluating The Level And Distribution Of Benefits From Dairy Industry Research," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 141-165, August.
    14. Wilcox, Christopher J., 1989. "Social Costs Of Regulation Of Primary Industry: An Application To Animal Welfare Regulation Of The Victorian Pig Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(3), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Frisvold, George B. & Sullivan, John & Raneses, Anton, 2003. "Genetic improvements in major US crops: the size and distribution of benefits," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119, March.
    16. Mahdi Bastani & Seyed Safdar Hosseini & Hormoz Asadi & Narges Salehnia, 2026. "Economic Evaluation of Agricultural Knowledge–Based Economy: Selected Improved Irrigated Bread Wheat Varieties," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(2), pages 4383-4440, April.
    17. Julian M. Alston & Richard J. Sexton & Mingxia Zhang, 1999. "Imperfect competition, functional forms, and the size and distribution of research benefits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(2), pages 155-172, October.
    18. Kim, Yun-Shik & Sumner, Daniel A., 2005. "Measuring Research Benefits With Import Ban Restrictions, Quality Changes, Non-Market Influences On Adoption And Food Security Incentives," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19148, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Davis, Jeffrey S. & Oram, Peter A. & Ryan, James G., 1987. "Assessment of Agricultural Research Priorities: An International Perspective," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 118048.
    20. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa03p153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.