IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p089.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural changes in the defence industry - opportunity or risk for regional governance capacities?

Author

Listed:
  • Zahlner, Kristina

Abstract

More than a decade has passed since the end of the Cold War. This phase has been characterised by shrinking defence contracts, far-reaching structural changes, and concentration processes in the defence industry. Thus, today the military industrial base presents itself in a different way: Former specialities have been reduced and the conditions of defence production have been adjusted to commercial ones. The moment seems to be opportune to reflect upon regional economies characterised by a high concentration of defence industry and to illuminate their present development conditions. In this context the study focuses on two particular questions: Do structural changes in the defence sector impede or improve regional chances for a long lasting innovative development? Which governance potentials are at the regions' disposal to take advantage of the structural changes, of the strong national interest and the high research intensity of the regional military production? To complete German experiences in this field (esp. Bodenseeraum) also a French and an English region are analysed. In France the agglomeration of Toulouse shows a high concentration of defence industry. These activities date back to the two World Wars and have dramatically changed in the last years. Today the military production is an integral component of the regional aerospace industry. The strong dependency on state initiatives, on the aerospace sector, on international companies increases the sensitiveness of the currently innovative economy to changes and limits the scope of action at the regional level. Public actors are conscious of these risks and have already set first steps to strengthen endogenous development initiatives. Unfortunately the public sector is quite fragmented, a multitude of different actors with specific constellations and coalitions of their varied interests and with differring resources and capacities is involved in questions of regional development. An improved complementarity and compatibility of the wide-spread single strategies is gaining importance. But so far the largely passive dependence of the regional economy on the innovative stimuli by the state or by the international companies has induced regional actors to neglect a more active take-up of extra-regional influences for intra-regional gains. Currently the region around Bristol is analysed. First results will be known in spring. The comparison of the different agglomerations will give an idea of governance capacities in regions with a high concentration of defence industry. At the moment the following statements appear in outlines. Structural changes in the defence sector include positive stimuli for the innovation capacities of concerned regional economies. But these stimuli have to be actively taken up and be used for regional aims. Policy-learning, transparency, information, and co-ordination seem to constitute essential aspects to foster the perception, the identification as well as the utilisation of extra-regional inputs as chances for the regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahlner, Kristina, 2002. "Structural changes in the defence industry - opportunity or risk for regional governance capacities?," ERSA conference papers ersa02p089, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/089.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1993. "Positive und negative Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Kevin Morgan, 1997. "The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 491-503.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    2. Weiss, Gerhard, 2000. "Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 243-255, December.
    3. Rehák Štefan & Buček Milan & Hudec Oto, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    4. D. G. Pickernell, 1999. "Inward Investment, Diffusion of Knowledge and New Working Practices," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(2), pages 144-160, August.
    5. Kean Birch & Andrew Cumbers, 2010. "Knowledge, Space, and Economic Governance: The Implications of Knowledge-Based Commodity Chains for Less-Favoured Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2581-2601, November.
    6. Alexander Cordes & Ulrich Schasse, 2015. "The firm's evaluation of local research institutes and universities - an empirical analysis for Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa15p933, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Fabrice Comptour, 2010. "Do clusters generate greater innovation and growth? An analysis of European regions," Working Papers 2010-15, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    9. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2006. "Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    11. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.
    12. Tappeiner, Gottfried & Hauser, Christoph & Walde, Janette, 2008. "Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 861-874, June.
    13. Manuel Acosta Sero & Daniel Coronado Guerrero, 1998. "The influence of regional location on the innovation activity of Spanish firms: A logit analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa98p63, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Piotr Zientara, 2008. "Polish Regions in the Age of a Knowledge‐based Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 60-85, March.
    16. Augusto Cusinato, 2015. "Il paesaggio, tessera mancante nella nozione di milieu," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-32.
    17. David Uhlir, 1998. "Internationalization, and Institutional and Regional Change: Restructuring Post-communist Networks in the Region of Lan w kroun, Czech Republic," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 673-685.
    18. Blind, Knut & Grupp, Hariolf, 1999. "Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 451-468, June.
    19. Jaya Prakash Pradhan & Mohammad Zohair, 2015. "Subnational Export Performance and Determinants," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 7(2), pages 133-174, August.
    20. van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2000. "Information And Communication Technology (Ict) And Regional Development: Distance Is Still Alive!," ERSA conference papers ersa00p371, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.