IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/war/wpaper/2026-18.html

Painting Price: A Machine Learning Approach to Art Valuation. Proof of Concept and Market Structure Diagnosis

Author

Listed:
  • Kostiantyn Okhrimenko

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

Abstract

This paper investigates the feasibility of predicting art prices using machine learning methods applied to a dataset of 20,905 paintings and drawings scraped from the Artsper online marketplace. We test tree-based ensemble models (Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGboost) and deep learning architectures (MLP, CNN, Fusion) on both tabular metadata and hand-crafted image features. Results consistently show poor predictive performance across all model types and feature sets. We argue that this outcome is not a methodological failure but a substantive finding: it constitutes a diagnosis of the market structure of contemporary art. Drawing on hedonic pricing theory (Rosen 1974), the sociology of cultural fields (Bourdieu 1993), and the economics of valuation (Velthuis 2005; Beckert and Rössel 2013), we propose a three-layer model of art price determinants: physical attributes (observable and partially captured by models), visual-aesthetic features (observable but poorly quantifiable), and narrative-reputational capital (largely unobservable in cross-sectional platform data).

Suggested Citation

  • Kostiantyn Okhrimenko, 2026. "Painting Price: A Machine Learning Approach to Art Valuation. Proof of Concept and Market Structure Diagnosis," Working Papers 2026-18, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  • Handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2026-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/download_file/d16a0b28-b4d9-4151-940c-598bdfdce933/4282
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pesando, James E, 1993. "Art as an Investment: The Market for Modern Prints," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1075-1089, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Fur, 2023. "Risk and return of classic car market prices: passion or financial investment?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 59-68, February.
    2. Aye, Goodness C. & Gil-Alana, Luis A. & Gupta, Rangan & Wohar, Mark E., 2017. "The efficiency of the art market: Evidence from variance ratio tests, linear and nonlinear fractional integration approaches," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 283-294.
    3. Brunella Bruno & Emilia Garcia‐Appendini & Giacomo Nocera, 2018. "Experience and Brokerage in Asset Markets: Evidence from Art Auctions," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(4), pages 833-864, December.
    4. Li, Yuexin & Ma, X. & Renneboog, Luc, 2021. "Pricing Art and the Art of Pricing : On Returns and Risk in Art Auction Markets," Other publications TiSEM 8d25ec25-78dc-4cdc-b054-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Penasse, J.N.G. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2014. "Bubbles and Trading Frenzies : Evidence from the Art Market," Other publications TiSEM bf0d8984-df7f-4f02-afc7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Alexander Cuntz & Matthias Sahli, 2024. "Intermediary liability and trade in follow-on innovation," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(1), pages 1-42, March.
    7. Marilena Locatelli-Biey & Roberto Zanola, 2002. "The Sculpture Market: An Adjacent Year Regression Index," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(1), pages 65-78, February.
    8. Kräussl, Roman & Mirgorodskaya, Elizaveta, 2016. "The winner's curse on art markets," CFS Working Paper Series 564, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    9. Bocart, Fabian Y. R. P. & Hafner, Christian M., 2012. "Volatility of price indices for heterogeneous goods," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-039, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    10. Newell, Richard & Papps, Kerry & Sanchirico, James, 2005. "Asset Pricing in Created Markets for Fishing Quotas," Motu Working Papers 292894, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    11. Menconi, Denise, 2022. "Art as investment," Textos para discussão 557, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    12. Koford, Kenneth & Tschoegl, Adrian E., 1998. "The market value of rarity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 445-457, March.
    13. Assaf, Ata & Kristoufek, Ladislav & Demir, Ender & Kumar Mitra, Subrata, 2021. "Market efficiency in the art markets using a combination of long memory, fractal dimension, and approximate entropy measures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Alessia Crotta & Filip Vermeylen, 2020. "Does nudity sell? An econometric analysis of the value of female nudity in Modigliani portraits," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-02-2020, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Dec 2020.
    15. Marinelli, Nicoletta & Palomba, Giulio, 2011. "A model for pricing Italian Contemporary Art paintings at auction," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 212-224, May.
    16. Orley Ashenfelter & Kathryn Graddy, 2011. "Sale Rates and Price Movements in Art Auctions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 212-216, May.
    17. David, Géraldine & Oosterlinck, Kim & Szafarz, Ariane, 2013. "Art market inefficiency," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 23-25.
    18. Bocart, Fabian Y.R.P. & Hafner, Christian M., 2012. "Econometric analysis of volatile art markets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3091-3104.
    19. Seohyeon Hwang & Jiye Ryu & Kihoon Hong, 2025. "The paradox of being unsold: hidden signaling value of bought-in in Korean art auction," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 639-658, September.
    20. Orley Ashenfelter & Kathryn Graddy, 2002. "Art Auctions: A Survey of Empirical Studies," Working Papers 121, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2026-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jacek Rapacz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.