IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wap/wpaper/1709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-efficient strategy for reducing particulate matter 2.5 in the Tokyo Metropolitan area:An integrated approach with aerosol and economic models

Author

Listed:
  • Yushi Kunugi

    (School of Political Science and Economics, and Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University)

  • Toshi H. Arimura

    (School of Political Science and Economics, and Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University)

  • Kazuyuki Iwata

    (Faculty of Economics, Matsuyama University)

  • Eiji Komatsu

    (Laboratory for Ecological Reconstruction Science)

  • Yoshie Hirayama

    (Laboratory for Ecological Reconstruction Science)

Abstract

Concentrations of particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5) are high in the Tokyo metropolitan area, even though concentrations of PM10 have dropped dramatically since the implementation of the NOx-PM Act. Currently, monitored concentration levels continue to exceed the designated ambient air quality standard set by the Japanese Ministry of the Environment. To our knowledge, no study has investigated a cost-efficient strategy to reduce PM 2.5 concentration levels in the Tokyo metropolitan area. This is the first study to examine a proper control strategy for Japan by developing an integrated model that includes both aerosol and economic models. The simulation results show that prefectures in the Tokyo metropolitan area cannot achieve the standards by relying on their own efforts to reduce PM 2.5. That is, prefectural governments in Tokyo metropolitan areas need to cooperate with prefectures outside of the area to improve their PM 2.5 concentration levels. Thus, we simulated policies under the assumption that emissions from other sources are reduced to evels such that the PM 2.5 concentration declines by approximately 18 µg/m3. We first simulated an efficient policy, i.e., the implementation of a pollution tax. We found that the total abatement cost to meet the air quality standard using the cost-efficient strategy is approximately 142.7 billion yen. We also simulated a policy in which we emphasize the equality of burden, i.e., each prefecture's government reduces emissions by the same proportion. In this scenario, the total cost of the strategy that maintains high equality among prefectures is approximately 416.3 billion yen. Thus, when authorities focus on other criteria such as equality, cost-efficiency deteriorates greatly. Therefore, to attain cleaner air, it is important that authorities make informed decisions when selecting a strategy.Length: 44 pages

Suggested Citation

  • Yushi Kunugi & Toshi H. Arimura & Kazuyuki Iwata & Eiji Komatsu & Yoshie Hirayama, 2017. "Cost-efficient strategy for reducing particulate matter 2.5 in the Tokyo Metropolitan area:An integrated approach with aerosol and economic models," Working Papers 1709, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wap:wpaper:1709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.waseda.jp/fpse/winpec/assets/uploads/2017/07/No.E1709.pdf
    File Function: First version,
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iwata, Kazuyuki & Arimura, Toshi, 2008. "Economic Analysis of a Japanese Air Pollution Regulation: An Optimal Retirement Problem under Vehicle Type Regulation in the NOx–Particulate Matter Law," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-15, Resources for the Future.
    2. Hilary Sigman, 2002. "International Spillovers and Water Quality in Rivers: Do Countries Free Ride?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1152-1159, September.
    3. Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura & Tetsuya Shimane, 2014. "The effectiveness of vehicle emission control policies: Evidence from Japanese experience," Working Papers e077, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yushi Kunugi & Toshi H Arimura & Kazuyuki Iwata & Eiji Komatsu & Yoshie Hirayama, 2018. "Cost-efficient strategy for reducing PM 2.5 levels in the Tokyo metropolitan area: An integrated approach with air quality and economic models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura & Tetsuya Shimane, 2014. "The effectiveness of vehicle emission control policies: Evidence from Japanese experience," Working Papers e077, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    3. Sheila M. Olmstead & Hilary Sigman, 2015. "Damming the Commons: An Empirical Analysis of International Cooperation and Conflict in Dam Location," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 497-526.
    4. David A Keiser & Joseph S Shapiro, 2019. "Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(1), pages 349-396.
    5. Sigman, Hilary, 2005. "Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 82-101, July.
    6. Ying She & Yaobin Liu & Yangu Deng & Lei Jiang, 2020. "Can China’s Government-Oriented Environmental Regulation Reduce Water Pollution? Evidence from Water Pollution Intensive Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Kahn, Matthew E., 2004. "Domestic pollution havens: evidence from cancer deaths in border counties," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 51-69, July.
    8. Brainerd, Elizabeth & Menon, Nidhiya, 2014. "Seasonal effects of water quality: The hidden costs of the Green Revolution to infant and child health in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 49-64.
    9. David A. Keiser & Joseph K. Shapiro, 2018. "Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 17-wp571, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    10. Rodrigo Barbone Gonzalez & José Renato Haas Ornelas & Thiago Christiano Silva, 2023. "The Value of Clean Water: evidence from an environmental disaster," Working Papers Series 583, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    11. Matthew E. Kahn & Pei Li & Daxuan Zhao, 2013. "Pollution Control Effort at China's River Borders: When Does Free Riding Cease?," NBER Working Papers 19620, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Millimet, Daniel L., 2013. "Environmental Federalism: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 7831, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Ruoff, Gabi, 2008. "Grow rich and clean up later? International assistance and the provision of environmental quality in low- and middle-income countries," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Zurich 2008 37, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. Evans, Mary F. & Stafford, Sarah L., 2019. "The Clean Air Act Watch List and federal oversight of state enforcement efforts," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 170-184.
    15. Chen, Zhao & Kahn, Matthew E. & Liu, Yu & Wang, Zhi, 2018. "The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 468-485.
    16. Chen, Xiaoguang & Ye, Jingjing, 2017. "When the Wind Blows: Spatial Spillover Effects of Urban Air Pollution," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258256, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Fredriksson, Per G. & Wollscheid, Jim R., 2014. "Environmental decentralization and political centralization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 402-410.
    18. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chiu, Yi-Bin & Sun, Chia-Hung, 2010. "The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for water pollution: Do regions matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 12-23, January.
    19. Patrick J. Walsh & J. Walter Milon & David O. Scrogin, 2011. "The Spatial Extent of Water Quality Benefits in Urban Housing Markets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(4), pages 628-644.
    20. S. Rousseau, 2005. "Effluent Trading to Improve Water Quality. What do we Know Today?," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 229-260.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Particulate matter 2.5; cost-efficiency; equality; control strategy; pollution tax;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wap:wpaper:1709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Haruko Noguchi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spwasjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.