How Reliable are Household Expenditures as a Proxy for Permanent Income? Implications for the Income-Nutrition Relationship
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Gibson, John & Kim, Bonggeun, 2013. "How reliable are household expenditures as a proxy for permanent income? Implications for the income–nutrition relationship," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 23-25.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Chairassamee, Nattanicha & Chancharoenchai, Kanokwan & Saraithong, Wuthiya & Temsumrit, Navarat, 2024. "Inequality in educational opportunity in Thailand during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
- Mach, Radomír & Weinzettel, Jan & Ščasný, Milan, 2018.
"Environmental Impact of Consumption by Czech Households: Hybrid Input–Output Analysis Linked to Household Consumption Data,"
Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 62-73.
- Macha, Radomír & Weinzettel, Jan & Ščasný, Milan, 2018. "Environmental impact of consumption by Czech households: hybrid input–output analysis linked to household consumption data," MPRA Paper 106599, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Farr, Marina & Stoeckl, Natalie & Alam Beg, Rabiul, 2014. "The non-consumptive (tourism) ‘value’ of marine species in the Northern section of the Great Barrier Reef," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 89-103.
- Friedman, Jed & Beegle, Kathleen & De Weerdt, Joachim & Gibson, John, 2017. "Decomposing response error in food consumption measurement: Implications for survey design from a randomized survey experiment in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 94-111.
- Florian Wendelspiess Ch�vez Ju�rez, 2015. "Measuring Inequality of Opportunity with Latent Variables," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 106-121, February.
- John Gibson, 2016. "Measuring Chronic Hunger from Diet Snapshots: Why 'Bottom up' Survey Counts and 'Top down' FAO Estimates Will Never Meet," Working Papers in Economics 16/07, University of Waikato.
More about this item
Keywords
; ; ;JEL classification:
- C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables
- I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
- O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-AGR-2011-03-26 (Agricultural Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wai:econwp:11/03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geua Boe-Gibson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dewaknz.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wai/econwp/11-03.html