IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/619.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measures for Ph.D. Evaluation: the Recruitment Process

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella D'Agostino

    ()

  • Stefania Fruzzetti

    ()

  • Giulio Ghellini

    ()

  • Laura Neri

    ()

Abstract

Recently the quality of Higher Education (HE) system and its evaluation have been key issues of the political and scientific debate on education policies all over Europe. In the wide landscape that involves the entire HE system we draw attention on the third level of its organization, i.e. the Ph.D. In particular, this paper discusses the necessity of monitoring the recruitment process of Ph.D. system because it represents a fundamental aspect of the Ph.D. system as a whole. We introduce a set of concepts related to the recruitment process and then we make them computable with synthetic indicators. The study provides an empirical analysis based on doctoral schools of four academic years at the University of Siena. Proposed indicators are finally used for detecting weakness and strength of each Ph.D. school.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella D'Agostino & Stefania Fruzzetti & Giulio Ghellini & Laura Neri, 2011. "Measures for Ph.D. Evaluation: the Recruitment Process," Department of Economics University of Siena 619, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/619.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Saisana & A. Saltelli & S. Tarantola, 2005. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(2), pages 307-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ph.D. schools; Ph.D.s. recruitment; diversity; external attractiveness; polarization;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabrizio Becatti). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.