IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/use/tkiwps/2307.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of growth: Stakeholder value creation by high-growth firms

Author

Listed:
  • Mirella Schrijvers
  • Jan Jacob Vogelaar

Abstract

High-growth firms are known to contribute extraordinarily to economic growth and job creation, but concerns have been raised about their exclusionary focus on creating shareholder value. This paper adopts a stakeholder capability perspective to investigate social value creation by high-growth firms. Interviews with founders and CEOs of high-growth firms in the Netherlands provide insight into the mechanisms through which these firms create and destroy value for their stakeholders. We find that the rapid growth these firms experience can be a driver of some unique growth-related value creation mechanisms and serves as an amplifier of more general value creation mechanisms. The value creation of high-growth firms is shaped by certain firm attributes. This results in a typology of high-growth firms from a stakeholder value perspective, indicating three types: profit-driven high-growth firms, conscious high-growth firms, and mission-driven high-growth firms. While rapid growth presents firms with unique challenges and trade-offs between stakeholders, we argue that, if directed well, it also creates opportunities to substantially increase their social value creation. The heterogeneity of high-growth firms with respect to stakeholder value creation raises the question whether targeting high-growth firms in general is good entrepreneurship policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirella Schrijvers & Jan Jacob Vogelaar, 2023. "The impact of growth: Stakeholder value creation by high-growth firms," Working Papers 2307, Utrecht School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:2307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/436071/LEG_USE_WP_23-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filipe Santos, 2012. "A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 335-351, December.
    2. Herman Aguinis & Angelo M. Solarino, 2019. "Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1291-1315, August.
    3. Scott Shane, 2009. "Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 141-149, August.
    4. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    5. A. Montgomery & Peter Dacin & M. Dacin, 2012. "Collective Social Entrepreneurship: Collaboratively Shaping Social Good," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 375-388, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babita Bhatt & Israr Qureshi & Suhaib Riaz, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 605-630, February.
    2. Iuliu Marin IVANESCU & Camelia M. GHEORGHE & Gina Gilet SZTRUTEN, 2013. "Social Entrepreneurship In Eu Region," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4.1), pages 416-426, december.
    3. Sophie Bacq & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2018. "A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 589-611, October.
    4. Dimitratos, Pavlos & Buck, Trevor & Fletcher, Margaret & Li, Nicolas, 2016. "The motivation of international entrepreneurship: The case of Chinese transnational entrepreneurs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1103-1113.
    5. Siebold, Nicole, 2021. "Reference points for business model innovation in social purpose organizations: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 710-719.
    6. Newth Jamie, 2016. "Social Enterprise Innovation in Context: Stakeholder Influence through Contestation," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 369-399, October.
    7. Ostertag, Felix & Hahn, Rüdiger & Ince, Inan, 2021. "Blended value co-creation: A qualitative investigation of relationship designs of social enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 428-445.
    8. Lily Kiminami & Shinichi Furuzawa & Akira Kiminami, 2022. "Exploring the possibilities of creating shared value in Japan’s urban agriculture: using a mixed methods approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 541-569, June.
    9. Alex Gillett & Kim Loader & Bob Doherty & Jonathan M. Scott, 2019. "An Examination of Tensions in a Hybrid Collaboration: A Longitudinal Study of an Empty Homes Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 949-967, July.
    10. Busch, Christian & Barkema, Harry, 2022. "Align or perish: social enterprise network orchestration in Sub-Saharan Africa," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115350, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Rocío Aliaga-Isla & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2018. "From “Push Out” to “Pull In” Together : An Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship Definitions in the Academic Field," Post-Print hal-02312230, HAL.
    12. Ronit Yitshaki & Fredric Kropp & Benson Honig, 2022. "The Role of Compassion in Shaping Social Entrepreneurs’ Prosocial Opportunity Recognition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 617-647, August.
    13. Elena-Simina Lakatos & Bercea Oana Bianca & Laura Bacali, 2016. "The concept of innovation in social economy. A review and a research agenda," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 11(1), pages 32-50, June.
    14. Gupta, Parul & Chauhan, Sumedha & Paul, Justin & Jaiswal, M.P., 2020. "Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 209-229.
    15. Björn C. Mitzinneck & Marya L. Besharov, 2019. "Managing Value Tensions in Collective Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Temporal, Structural, and Collaborative Compromise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 381-400, October.
    16. Serres, Coline & Hudon, Marek & Maon, François, 2022. "Social corporations under the spotlight: A governance perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3).
    17. Kuckertz, Andreas & Bernhard, Alexander & Berger, Elisabeth S.C. & Dvouletý, Ondřej & Harms, Rainer & Jack, Sarah & Kibler, Ewald, 2023. "Scaling the right answers – Creating and maintaining hope through social entrepreneurship in light of humanitarian crises," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    18. Chandra, Yanto, 2018. "New narratives of development work? Making sense of social entrepreneurs’ development narratives across time and economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 306-326.
    19. Luca Mongelli & Francesco Rullani & Tommaso Ramus & Tomislav Rimac, 2019. "The Bright Side of Hybridity: Exploring How Social Enterprises Manage and Leverage Their Hybrid Nature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 301-305, October.
    20. Michael H. Morris & Susana C. Santos & Donald F. Kuratko, 2021. "The great divides in social entrepreneurship and where they lead us," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1089-1106, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    High-growth firms; Value creation; Stakeholder capabilities;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:use:tkiwps:2307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Muilwijk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eiruunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.