IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucr/wpaper/202414.html

Asymmetric AdaBoost for Maximum Score Estimation of High-dimensional Binary Choice Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jianghao Chu

    (JPMorgan Chase & Co., Jersey City, NJ 07310)

  • Tae-Hwy Lee

    (Department of Economics, University of California Riverside)

  • Aman Ullah

    (Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside)

Abstract

Carter Hill's numerous contributions (books and articles) in econometrics stand out especially in pedagogy. An important aspect of his pedagogy is to integrate "theory and practice'' of econometrics, as coined into the titles of his popular books. The new methodology we propose in this paper is consistent with these contributions of Carter Hill. In particular, we bring the maximum score regression of \citet{Manski1975,Manski1985} to high dimension in theory and show that the "Asymmetric AdaBoost'' provides the algorithmic implementation of the high dimensional maximum score regression in practice. Recent advances in machine learning research have not only expanded the horizon of econometrics by providing new methods but also provided the algorithmic aspects of many of traditional econometrics methods. For example, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) introduced by \citet{Freund1996} has gained enormous success in binary/discrete classification/prediction. In this paper, we introduce the ``Asymmetric AdaBoost'' and relate it to the maximum score regression in the algorithmic perspective. The Asymmetric AdaBoost solves high-dimensional binary classification/prediction problem with state-dependent loss functions. Asymmetric AdaBoost produces a nonparametric classifier via minimizing the "asymmetric exponential risk'' which is a convex surrogate of the non-convex 0-1 risk. The convex risk function gives a huge computational advantage over non-convex risk functions of \citet{Manski1975,Manski1985} especially when the data is high-dimensional. The resulting nonparametric classifier is more robust than the parametric classifiers whose performance depends on the correct specification of the model. We show that the risk of the classifier that Asymmetric AdaBoost produces approaches the Bayes risk which is the infimum of risk that can be achieved by all classifiers. Monte Carlo experiments show that the Asymmetric AdaBoost performs better than the commonly used LASSO-regularized logistic regression when parametric assumption is violated and sample size is large. We apply the Asymmetric AdaBoost to predict business cycle turning points as in \citet{Ng2014a}.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2024. "Asymmetric AdaBoost for Maximum Score Estimation of High-dimensional Binary Choice Regression Models," Working Papers 202414, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucr:wpaper:202414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.ucr.edu/repec/ucr/wpaper/202414.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    2. Elliott, Graham & Lieli, Robert P., 2013. "Predicting binary outcomes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 15-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2018. "Best subset binary prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 39-56.
    2. Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2023. "Asymmetric AdaBoost for High-dimensional Maximum Score Regression," Working Papers 202306, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    3. Ouyang, Fu & Yang, Thomas T., 2025. "High dimensional binary choice model with unknown heteroskedasticity or instrumental variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    5. Viet Hoang Dinh & Didier Nibbering & Benjamin Wong, 2023. "Random Subspace Local Projections," CAMA Working Papers 2023-34, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Hajime Shimao & Sung Joo Kim & Warut Khern-Am-Nuai & Maxime C. Cohen, 2025. "Revisiting the CEO Effect Through a Machine Learning Lens," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 5396-5408, June.
    7. Ernesto Carrella & Richard M. Bailey & Jens Koed Madsen, 2018. "Indirect inference through prediction," Papers 1807.01579, arXiv.org.
    8. Rui Wang & Naihua Xiu & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2021. "Subspace quadratic regularization method for group sparse multinomial logistic regression," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 531-559, July.
    9. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    10. Masakazu Higuchi & Mitsuteru Nakamura & Shuji Shinohara & Yasuhiro Omiya & Takeshi Takano & Daisuke Mizuguchi & Noriaki Sonota & Hiroyuki Toda & Taku Saito & Mirai So & Eiji Takayama & Hiroo Terashi &, 2022. "Detection of Major Depressive Disorder Based on a Combination of Voice Features: An Exploratory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Vincent, Martin & Hansen, Niels Richard, 2014. "Sparse group lasso and high dimensional multinomial classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 771-786.
    12. Jeremy Rubin & Fan Fan & Laura Barisoni & Andrew R. Janowczyk & Jarcy Zee, 2026. "Novel Scalar-on-matrix Regression for Unbalanced Feature Matrices," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 18(1), pages 192-213, March.
    13. Álvarez-Liébana, J. & López-Pérez, A. & González-Manteiga, W. & Febrero-Bande, M., 2025. "A goodness-of-fit test for functional time series with applications to Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Perrot-Dockès Marie & Lévy-Leduc Céline & Chiquet Julien & Sansonnet Laure & Brégère Margaux & Étienne Marie-Pierre & Robin Stéphane & Genta-Jouve Grégory, 2018. "A variable selection approach in the multivariate linear model: an application to LC-MS metabolomics data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Fan, Jianqing & Jiang, Bai & Sun, Qiang, 2022. "Bayesian factor-adjusted sparse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 3-19.
    16. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    17. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine & Sergei Koulayev, 2018. "Price to Compete … with Many: How to Identify Price Competition in High-Dimensional Space," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4118-4136, September.
    18. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2024. "Causal Inference Under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 998-1009, July.
    19. Rina Friedberg & Julie Tibshirani & Susan Athey & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Local Linear Forests," Papers 1807.11408, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    20. Xiangwei Li & Thomas Delerue & Ben Schöttker & Bernd Holleczek & Eva Grill & Annette Peters & Melanie Waldenberger & Barbara Thorand & Hermann Brenner, 2022. "Derivation and validation of an epigenetic frailty risk score in population-based cohorts of older adults," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucr:wpaper:202414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelvin Mac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deucrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.