IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeow/23-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can Maths Apps Add Value to Learning? A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Laura A. Outhwaite

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Erin Early

    (Queen's University Belfast
    UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Christothea Herodotou

    (Open University)

  • Jo Van Herwegen

    (Department of Psychology and Human Development, IOE, UCL's Faculty for Education and Society)

Abstract

Educational maths applications (apps) are an emerging trend in young children's learning environments aiming to raise attainment. The current systematic review aimed to thematically synthesise quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies examining the impact of maths app interventions used at home or at school for young children in the first three years of compulsory education. The thematic narrative synthesis included 50 studies evaluating 77 maths apps with 23,981 children across 18 countries. Experimental methods were the most common designs, with 20 randomised control trials and 13 quasi-experimental designs. Most studies focused on mathematical learning outcomes with typically developing children and were conducted in the classroom, where practitioners implemented the app-based interventions. Studies predominately reported greater learning outcomes for young children using the evaluated maths apps compared to a range of control conditions. This provides promising evidence that maths apps can support young children's learning. However, usage and mathematical outcomes before and after the intervention were not consistently or reliably reported across studies, which should be addressed in future research. Based on the current evidence, eight directions for future research are also outlined to enhance the evidence base in this field and raise attainment in mathematics for young children.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura A. Outhwaite & Erin Early & Christothea Herodotou & Jo Van Herwegen, 2023. "Can Maths Apps Add Value to Learning? A Systematic Review," CEPEO Working Paper Series 23-02, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jan 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeow:23-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeow/cepeowp23-02.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lifeng Lin, 2018. "Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Nicholas Judd & Torkel Klingberg, 2021. "Training spatial cognition enhances mathematical learning in a randomized study of 17,000 children," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1548-1554, November.
    3. Michael Broda & Stephen Tucker & Eric Ekholm & Teri N. Johnson & Qiao Liang, 2019. "Small fingers, big data: Preschoolers’ subitizing speed and accuracy during interactions with multitouch technology," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(2), pages 211-222, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berger, Eva M. & Fehr, Ernst & Hermes, Henning & Schunk, Daniel & Winkel, Kirsten, 2020. "The Impact of Working Memory Training on Children's Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills," IZA Discussion Papers 13338, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Giulia Lazzaro & Andrea Battisti & Cristiana Varuzza & Laura Celestini & Pierpaolo Pani & Floriana Costanzo & Stefano Vicari & Roi Cohen Kadosh & Deny Menghini, 2021. "Boosting Numerical Cognition in Children and Adolescents with Mathematical Learning Disabilities by a Brain-Based Intervention: A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Nolte, Nils & Schmitz, Florian & Fleischer, Jens & Bungart, Maximilian & Leutner, Detlev, 2022. "Rotational complexity in mental rotation tests: Cognitive processes in tasks requiring mental rotation around cardinal and skewed rotation axes," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Chaikumbung, Mayula, 2021. "Institutions and consumer preferences for renewable energy: A meta-regression analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Abbe Muller & David Vlahov & Matthew J. Akiyama & Ann Kurth, 2020. "Hepatitis C Reinfection in People Who Inject Drugs in Resource-Limited Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Sean Cowlishaw & Isabella Freijah & Dzenana Kartal & Alyssa Sbisa & Ashlee Mulligan & MaryAnn Notarianni & Anne-Laure Couineau & David Forbes & Meaghan O’Donnell & Andrea Phelps & Katherine M. Iverson, 2022. "Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Samira Gonzalez-Hoelling & Carme Bertran-Noguer & Gloria Reig-Garcia & Rosa Suñer-Soler, 2021. "Effects of a Music-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Balance in Subacute Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Fahad M. Al Amer & Christopher G. Thompson & Lifeng Lin, 2021. "Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Education apps; student achievement; mathematics attainment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeow:23-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.