Author
Abstract
While proponents argue that minimum wage laws are essential in improving social welfare and economic well-being, implementation of minimum wage laws can also be associated with increased unemployment and the movement of workers into the informal sector where worker protection and workplace standards are less likely to be observed compared to the formal sector. A paper entitled “Estimating the Effects of Minimum Wage in a Developing Country: a Density Discontinuity Design Approach†(CLSRN Working Paper no.142) by CLSRN affiliate Hugo Jales (University of British Columbia), proposes a novel framework to empirically assess the effect of the minimum wage on unemployment, average wages, sector mobility, wage inequality, the size of the informal sector, and on labour tax revenues. The study finds that while minimum wage policy can increase average wages and reduce wage inequality, the policy has the unintended effect of causing labor tax revenues to fall as a result of workers shifting from the formal to informal sectors. Proponents of unionization assert that unions have beneficial social welfare impacts, such as providing workers with improved wage rates, fringe benefits and working conditions, but other evidence points to the negative effects of unions on corporate profits, investment, and employment growth. More recently, research has examined the potential for spillover effects of unions on the wage outcomes of non-unionized workers. Indeed, examination of spillover effects of union wage outcomes in the United States has been found to account for up to one-third of the growth in American wage inequality in recent decades. In a paper entitled “The Effect of Labour Relations Laws on Union Density Rates: Evidence from Canadian Provinces†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 141), CLSRN affiliates Scott Legree (University of Waterloo), Tammy Schirle (Wilfrid Laurier University) and Mikal Skuterud (University of Waterloo) examine the impact of changes in labour relation laws on union density rates in Canada. They find that while changes to labour relations laws have the potential to greatly increase union density rates, increased unionization through labour relations reform tends to benefit workers who would enjoy relatively high wages even in the absence of unions. Consequently, the authors argue that reforms in labour relations laws are unlikely to result in significant reductions in wage inequality
Suggested Citation
Tran, Vivian, 2014.
"Labour Market Matters - November 2014,"
CLSSRN working papers
clsrn_admin-2014-54, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 27 Nov 2014.
Handle:
RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-54
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
Minimum Wage;
Informality;
Unemployment;
Density Discontinuity;
Design;
Wage Inequality;
Labor Tax Revenues;
Formal Sector;
Labour relations legislati;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- J60 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - General
- J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
- J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
- J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General
- J58 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Public Policy
- K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vivian Tran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.