IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/trn/utwpeu/1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mission, strategie e valutazione delle performance delle aziende nonprofit in un approccio di stakeholder management

Author

Listed:
  • Ericka Costa
  • Tommaso Ramus

Abstract

Le aziende non profit (anp) sono particolari organizzazioni che hanno come obiettivo istituzionale non la creazione di profitto in senso economico ma la massimizzazione del valore sociale prodotto a vantaggio della collettivit di riferimento. Tale valore di natura intangibile e la sua definizione e misurazione dipendono in maniera fondamentale dalla percezione dei diversi stakeholder da esso a vario titolo influenzati. Per questo, per le anp il dialogo ed il coinvolgimento dei propri stakeholder nella definizione della missione e poi nelle scelte manageriali che ne conseguono elemento fondamentale per il raggiungimento di performance soddisfacenti. Le scelte strategiche devono quindi essere orientate al conseguimento degli obiettivi di missione (mission oriented) nel rispetto del modello organizzativo e gestionale di tipo multi-stakeholder. Per queste ragioni nel working paper si sottolinea l importanza di processi di stakeholder engagement per la definizione e la misurazione degli indicatori di performance: il valore sociale prodotto tale, infatti, solo se percepito dagli stakeholder coinvolti.******** (Mission, Strategies and Performance Evaluation in Nonprofit Organisations From a Stakeholder Management Approach Nonprofit organisations (NPOs) have emerged as important not-for-profit private actors providing goods or services directly related to their explicit aim to create social value for the community in which they work. In order to maximize its social value creation, an NPO firstly has to define its mission according to stakeholders expectations, then it has to carry it out considering how it is defined by stakeholders, and finally it has to measure its performance and account for it related to how their stakeholders evaluate performance achievement. Since the mission achievement and effectiveness of NPOs are not easy to estimate and to assess, it follows that NPO effectiveness is always a matter of comparison, and that NPO effectiveness is a social construction, which depends on the evaluation given by the stakeholders who have an impact on and are impacted by the mission of the organisation. For these reasons, in the present working paper we assert that managers of NPOs have to use strategic stakeholder relationships, and not only adaptive or reactive approaches, in order to negotiate outcomes which reflect win-win situations for different stakeholders.) (This paper is only available in italian)

Suggested Citation

  • Ericka Costa & Tommaso Ramus, 2010. "Mission, strategie e valutazione delle performance delle aziende nonprofit in un approccio di stakeholder management," Euricse Working Papers 1007, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
  • Handle: RePEc:trn:utwpeu:1007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.euricse.eu/publications/wp-00710-mission-strategie-e-valutazione-delle-performance-delle-aziende-nonprofit-in-un-approccio-di-stakeholder-management/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa VAN HOOMISSEN, 1991. "Nonprofit Organizations In The Mixed Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 519-550, October.
    2. Ecchia, Giulio & Zarri, Luca, 2004. "Capitale sociale e accountability: il ruolo del bilancio di missione nella governance delle organizzazioni non profit," AICCON Working Papers 3-2004, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    3. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1987. "Ideals versus Dollars: Donors, Charity Managers, and Government Grants," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(4), pages 810-823, August.
    4. Carlo Borzaga & Luigi Mittone, 1997. "The Multi-Stakeholders Versus the Nonprofit Organisation," Department of Economics Working Papers 9707, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ericka Costa & Tommaso Ramus, 2010. "Analisi delle caratteristiche del processo gestionale dei Centri di Servizio per il Volontariato (CSV) in un ottica stakeholder management," Euricse Working Papers 1010, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Carini & Ericka Costa & Maurizio Carpita & Michele Andreaus, 2012. "The Italian Social Cooperatives in 2008: A Portrait Using Descriptive and Principal Component Analysis," Euricse Working Papers 1235, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    2. Jérǒme BALLET, 1994. "L'Entreprise À Vocation Sociale," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(4), pages 623-640, October.
    3. Olivier Grégoire, 2004. "Pluralité de parties prenantes et d'objectifs dans les entreprises sociales d'insertion," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 73-79.
    4. Carlo Borzaga & Ermanno Tortia, 2004. "Worker involvement in entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations. Toward a new assessment of workers' perceived satisfaction and fairness," Department of Economics Working Papers 0409, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    5. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    6. Poledrini Simone & Montrone Alessandro & Searing Elizabeth A. M., 2022. "A Model for Directing and Modulating Public Interventions in Social Enterprises," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 307-332, October.
    7. Katia Melnik & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2008. "An Economic Approach To Voluntary Association," Working Papers halshs-00347448, HAL.
    8. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    9. Richard G. Frank & David S. Salkever, 1988. "Altruism, Rivalry and Crowding-Out in the Nonprofit Firm's Supply of Charity Services: The Case of Hospitals," NBER Working Papers 2753, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Junyi Shen & Nobuko Kanaya & Hiromasa Takahashi, 2014. "The Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-market: An Analysis of the Long-term Care Services Market in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-08, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    11. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    12. Antoci, Angelo & Galeotti, Marcello & Russu, Paolo & Zarri, Luca, 2006. "Generalized trust and sustainable coexistence between socially responsible firms and nonprofit organizations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 783-802.
    13. Romano, Richard & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2001. "Why charities announce donations: a positive perspective," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 423-447, September.
    14. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:671:p:1-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Antonio PICCIOTTI & Andrea BERNARDONI & Massimo COSSIGNANI & Luca FERRUCCI, 2014. "Social Cooperatives In Italy: Economic Antecedents And Regional Distribution," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(2), pages 213-231, June.
    16. Marco Ballin & Marco Di Zio & Marcello D'Orazio & Mauro Scanu & Nicola Torelli, 2008. "File concatenation of survey data: a computer intensive approach to sampling weights estimation," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 10(2), pages 5-12, October.
    17. Donghyun Kim & Up Lim, 2017. "Social Enterprise as a Catalyst for Sustainable Local and Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Marc Bilodeau & Al Slivinski, 1998. "Rational Nonprofit Entrepreneurship," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 551-571, December.
    19. Patrick Gianfaldoni, 2019. "Social Business Economy versus Social Political Economy: The Social Firm in perspective [Économie sociale d'entreprise versus Économie sociale politique : La firme sociale en perspective]," Post-Print hal-03262366, HAL.
    20. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    21. Virginie PÉROTIN, 2001. "The voluntary sector, job creation and social policy: Illusions and opportunities," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 140(3), pages 327-362, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:trn:utwpeu:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Barbara Franchini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/euricit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.