IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiutis/a9b1e40b-8e0b-4782-9968-c99b11144f75.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cooperation and competition in inventory games

Author

Listed:
  • Meca, A.
  • Garcia-Jurado, I.
  • Borm, P.E.M.

    (Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management)

Abstract

Inventory cost games are introduced in Meca et al. (1999). These games arise when considering the possibility of joint ordering in n-person EOQ inventory situations. Moreover, the SOC-rule is introduced and analysed as a cost allocation rule for this type of situations. In the current paper it is seen that n-person EPQ situations with shortages lead to exactly the same class of cost games. Furthermore, an alternative characterization of the SOC-rule is offered, primarily based on a transfer property which constitutes a special form of additivity. Necessary input variables for the SOC-rule are the (optimal) individual average number of orders per time unit in case there is no cooperation. Assuming that these average numbers are observable but not verifiable, we allow the players to select them strategically, while knowing that the SOC-rule will be (consecutively) applied as the cost allocation principle. Necessary and sufficient conditions are provided for the existence (and uniqueness) of a so-called constructive equilibrium in which all players make joint orders. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Meca, A. & Garcia-Jurado, I. & Borm, P.E.M., 2003. "Cooperation and competition in inventory games," Other publications TiSEM a9b1e40b-8e0b-4782-9968-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:a9b1e40b-8e0b-4782-9968-c99b11144f75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/549496/PB43____.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berliant, Marcus & ten Raa, Thijs, 1991. "On the continuum approach of spatial and some local public goods or product differentiation models: Some problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 95-120, October.
    2. Fujita, Masahisa & Krugman, Paul, 1995. "When is the economy monocentric?: von Thunen and Chamberlin unified," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 505-528, August.
    3. Fujita,Masahisa, 1991. "Urban Economic Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521396455, November.
    4. Bonanno, Giacomo, 1990. " General Equilibrium Theory with Imperfect Competition," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 297-328.
    5. Berliant, Marcus & Papageorgiou, Yorgos Y. & Wang, Ping, 1990. "On welfare theory and urban economics," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 245-261, September.
    6. Starrett, David, 1978. "Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 21-37, February.
    7. Berliant, Marcus, 1991. "Comments on: 'On the foundations of land use theory: Discrete versus continuous populations' by Y. Asami, M. Fujita and T.E. Smith," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 639-645, December.
    8. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    9. Bonnisseau, Jean-Marc & Cornet, Bernard, 1988. "Existence of equilibria when firms follow bounded losses pricing rules," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, pages 119-147.
    10. Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M., 1990. "Agglomeration economies, types, and sizes of cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 25-45, January.
    11. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    12. Krugman, Paul, 1993. "On the number and location of cities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 293-298, April.
    13. Spyros Vassilaikis, 1989. "Increasing Returns and Strategic Behavior: The Worker-Firm Ratio," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, pages 622-636.
    14. Vassilakis, Spyros, 1993. "Multiproduct firms in the representative consumer model of product differentiation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 149-160.
    15. Abdel-Rahman, H. M., 1988. "Product differentiation, monopolistic competition and city size," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 69-86, February.
    16. Asami, Yasushi, 1985. "A game-theoretic approach to the division of profits from economic land development," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 233-246, May.
    17. Fujita, Masahisa & Ogawa, Hideaki, 1982. "Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 161-196, May.
    18. Berliant, Marcus & Fujita, Masahisa, 1992. "Alonso's Discrete Population Model of Land Use: Efficient Allocations and Competitive Equilibria," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 33(3), pages 535-566, August.
    19. Asami, Y. & Fujita, M. & Smith, T. E., 1991. "On the foundations of land use theory : Discrete versus continuous populations," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 473-508, February.
    20. Berliant, Marcus, 1985. "Equilibrium models with land : A criticism and an alternative," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 325-340, June.
    21. Berliant, Marcus & Wang, Ping, 1993. "Endogenous formation of a city without agglomerative externalities or market imperfections : Marketplaces in a regional economy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 121-144, March.
    22. Fujita, Masahisa, 1988. "A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration : Differentiated product approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 87-124, February.
    23. Gretsky, Neil E. & Ostroy, Joseph M. & Zame, William R., 1999. "Perfect Competition in the Continuous Assignment Model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 60-118, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:spr:compst:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:499-517 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:spr:compst:v:75:y:2012:i:1:p:67-82 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bernstein, Fernando & Gürhan Kök, A. & Meca, Ana, 2015. "Cooperation in assembly systems: The role of knowledge sharing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 160-171.
    4. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2009. "Production-inventory games: A new class of totally balanced combinatorial optimization games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 205-219, January.
    5. Li, Jun & Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian, 2014. "Inventory games with permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 694-700.
    6. Ana Meca, 2007. "A core-allocation family for generalized holding cost games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(3), pages 499-517, June.
    7. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2008. "Production-inventory games and PMAS-games: Characterizations of the Owen point," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 96-108, July.
    8. Ana Meca & Luis Guardiola & Andrés Toledo, 2007. "p-additive games: a class of totally balanced games arising from inventory situations with temporary discounts," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 322-340, December.
    9. repec:eee:ejores:v:263:y:2017:i:3:p:827-837 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Perea, F. & Puerto, J. & Fernández, F.R., 2009. "Modeling cooperation on a class of distribution problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 726-733, November.
    11. Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G. & García-Jurado, I. & Meca, A. & Mosquera, M.A., 2015. "Cooperation on capacitated inventory situations with fixed holding costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 719-726.
    12. Güler, Kemal & Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper, 2017. "Design and analysis of mechanisms for decentralized joint replenishment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 992-1002.
    13. Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper & Güler, Kemal, 2013. "Non-cooperative joint replenishment under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 434-443.
    14. Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G. & García-Jurado, I. & Meca, A. & Mosquera, M.A., 2011. "Cooperative game theory and inventory management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 459-466, May.
    15. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.
    16. Evren Körpeoğlu & Alper Şen & Kemal Güler, 2012. "A private contributions game for joint replenishment," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(1), pages 67-82, February.
    17. D. Bauso & J. Timmer, 2009. "Robust dynamic cooperative games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(1), pages 23-36, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:a9b1e40b-8e0b-4782-9968-c99b11144f75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Broekman). General contact details of provider: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/about/schools/economics-and-management/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.