IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tho/iscthi/section3-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government subsidies efficiency analysis in the tourism sector in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Dražen Vrhovski

    (Wawa LLC, Samobor, Croatia)

  • Bruna Földing
  • Sebastijan Prebanić

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of the work undertaken was to assess to what extent the government subsidies influence the tourism volume in Croatia in order to be regarded a key influencing mechanism for meeting the objectives of the tourism development strategy. Design –Tourism is seen by many as the most important sector in the Croatian economy. The key driver in generating this revenue is costal Croatia focusing primarily on well-established landmarks. Given the key directions set forth by the Croatian tourism development strategy, further development is seen to be driven by promoting tourism in continental Croatia in addition to the traditional areas. This is expected to cut down seasonality and generate diverse new products and services. The corresponding investment and incentivising strategy relies largely on public subsidies to co-finance development projects at landmarks yet to attract substantial touristic demand. Methodology – The paper analyses the efficiency of the subsidies from different public sources by investigating the subsidised amounts with the corresponding tourism volumes. First, baseline volumes were defined for the 2011 financial year using the overnights and employment data. The 2012 and 2013 volumes were then analysed against the baseline data. All the data assessed were geo-referenced to allow for the spatial analysis of the generated effects to be made. Approach – A research hypothesis was set that, in continental Croatia, only marginal advances in the generated tourism volume may be expected as a direct consequence of the subsidised development projects primarily due to the lack of the tourist infrastructure needed. To assess the geographic distribution of both the subsidies and the corresponding volumes, advanced geographic information software (GIS) tools were applied on the NUTS III level statistical data. Findings – Discrepancies in volumes not matching the subsidised amount have been identified and recommendations have been given to mitigate these adverse effects. The paper advocates changes in the subsidising policies to be made, focusing primarily on geographic areas which are capacitated to provide significant immediate positive effects on performance indicators such as employment, GDP and others. This is seen particularly important in times of major economic crisis. Originality – The research utilises detailed NUTS III level data which were geo-referenced to allow for spatial analyses to be made. A state-of-the-art spatial model of the research territory was generated and advanced GIS software utilised in the analyses undertaken.

Suggested Citation

  • Dražen Vrhovski & Bruna Földing & Sebastijan Prebanić, 2014. "Government subsidies efficiency analysis in the tourism sector in Croatia," Tourism and Hospitality Industry section3-2, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:tho:iscthi:section3-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fthm.uniri.hr/files/Kongresi/THI/Papers/2014/THI_May2014_161to173.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Irwin, 2003. "Public Money for Private Infrastructure : Deciding When to Offer Guarantees, Output-based Subsidies, and Other Fiscal Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15117, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Noel & W. Jan Brzeski, 2005. "Mobilizing Private Finance for Local Infrastructure in Europe and Central Asia : An Alternative Public Private Partnership Framework," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7333, December.
    2. Buso, Marco & Moretto, Michele & Zormpas, Dimitrios, 2021. "Excess returns in Public-Private Partnerships: Do governments pay too much?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Ozorio, Luiz de Magalhães & Bastian-Pinto, Carlos de Lamare & Baidya, Tara Keshar Nanda & Brandão, Luiz Eduardo Teixeira, 2013. "Investment decision in integrated steel plants under uncertainty," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 55-64.
    4. Mario, Cuevas, 2007. "A Practical Guide to the Assessment of the Vulnerability of the Non-Financial Private Sector," MPRA Paper 1375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. André De Palma & Luc E. Leruth & Guillaume Prunier, 2012. "Towards a Principal-Agent Based Typology of Risks in Public-Private Partnerships," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 57-73.
    6. Bogdan Rębiasz & Bartłomiej Gaweł & Iwona Skalna, 2017. "Valuing managerial flexibility. An application of real-option theory to steel industry investments," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(2), pages 91-111.
    7. Leandro Medina, 2018. "Assessing Fiscal Risks in Bangladesh," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 35(1), pages 196-222, March.
    8. Luc Leruth, 2012. "Public-Private Cooperation in Infrastructure Development: A Principal-Agent Story of Contingent Liabilities, Fiscal Risks, and Other (Un)pleasant Surprises," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 223-237, June.
    9. Kangsoo Kim & Hyejin Cho & Donghyung Yook, 2019. "Financing for a Sustainable PPP Development: Valuation of the Contractual Rights under Exercise Conditions for an Urban Railway PPP Project in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2009. "Toward a Theory of Regulation for Developing Countries: Following Jean-Jacques Laffont's Lead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 729-770, September.
    11. Nicola Chiara & Michael Garvin, 2008. "Variance models for project financial risk analysis with applications to greenfield BOT highway projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9), pages 925-939.
    12. Carlos Contreras & Julio Angulo, 2017. "Valuing Governmental Support in Road PPPs," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 223(4), pages 37-66, December.
    13. Luiz Eduardo Brandao & Eduardo Saraiva, 2008. "The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(11), pages 1171-1180.
    14. Cledan Mandri-Perrott & Iain Menzies, 2010. "Private Sector Participation in Light Rail-Light Metro Transit Initiatives," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2416, December.
    15. Ilker Ersegun Kayhan & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2016. "Evaluating Minimum-Traffic Guarantees for PPPs in Turkey by Real-Option Pricing," Development Discussion Papers 2016-02, JDI Executive Programs.
    16. Frédéric Marty, 2014. "De la soutenabilité budgétaire des contrats de partenariat public-privé," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-35, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    17. K.C. Iyer & Mohammed Sagheer, 2011. "A real options based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate-transfer highway projects in India," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(8), pages 771-779, June.
    18. International Monetary Fund, 2009. "The Effects of the Financial Crisison Public-Private Partnerships," IMF Working Papers 2009/144, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Laura Garrido & José Manuel Vassallo, 2020. "Is Ex-Post Fiscal Support to PPPs Sustainable? Analysis of Government Loans Granted to Shadow-Toll Roads in Spain: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. World Bank, 2007. "Bulgaria - Accelerating Bulgaria's Convergence : Volume 2. The Challenge of Rasing Productivity," World Bank Publications - Reports 7876, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Croatian tourism; development projects; continental tourism; subsides; GIS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tho:iscthi:section3-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Montan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.