IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ssb/dispap/965.html

Green technology policies versus carbon pricing. An intergenerational perspective

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Technology policy is the most widespread form of climate policy and is often preferred over seemingly efficient carbon pricing. We propose a new explanation for this observation: gains that predominantly accrue to households with large capital assets and that influence majority decisions in favor of technology policy. We study climate policy choices in an overlapping generations model with heterogeneous energy technologies and distortionary income taxation. Compared to carbon pricing, green technology policy leads to a pronounced capital subsidy effect that benefits most of the current generations but burdens future generations. Based on majority voting which disregards future generations, green technology policies are favored over a carbon tax. Smart "polluter-pays" financing of green technology policies enables obtaining the support of current generations while realizing efficiency gains for future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Rausch & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2021. "Green technology policies versus carbon pricing. An intergenerational perspective," Discussion Papers 965, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/green-technology-policies-versus-carbon-pricing/_/attachment/inline/fe68d3cd-5337-434e-a08e-43b826a42ee3:fa49cb4ddd8fd6e507a12e8e465d03efb37823be/DP965_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Green technology policies versus carbon pricing. An intergenerational perspective
      by Christian Zimmermann in NEP-DGE blog on 2021-11-22 19:22:32

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Accinelli, E. & Giombini, G. & Muñiz, H. & Owen, L. & Policardo, L. & Carrera, E.J. Sánchez, 2025. "On the game of going green: How do consumers, firms, and banks struggle to escape environmental traps?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Wu, Shu & Hu, Fangfang & Zhang, Zhijian, 2024. "Visible hand or invisible hand in climate governance? Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. David Suárez‐Cuesta & Maria C. Latorre & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2024. "A policy and quantitative analysis of U.S. climate policy from a global perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S7), pages 21-33, November.
    5. Du, Panpan & Li, Qiliang, 2024. "Evaluating carbon tax impact on natural resource extraction in developing regions: Implicating green recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Viktor Koval & Piotr Olczak & Mira Hakova & Mykhailo Bilyi & Dmitry Kretov & Olga Laktionova, 2023. "Analysis of Financial Outsourcing Management in Regional Environmental Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssb:dispap:965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: L Maasø (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbgvno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.