IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Un examen de trois contributions au débat sur les retraites. Critique des rapports : 'L'avenir des systèmes de retraite', 'L'avenir des retraites' et 'Retraites choisies et progressives'

Listed author(s):
  • Henri Sterdyniak

    (Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques)

Après la parution du rapport Charpin en mars 1999, le débat sur l’avenir des retraites en France s’est heureusement intensifié. Je me propose ici de discuter trois contributions importantes parues à la fin de 1999 : l’Avis Teulade adopté au Conseil économique et social; l’ouvrage cosigné par Jean-Chistophe Le Duigou et Jean-Marie Toulisse, qui exprime le point de vue des deux plus importantes organisations syndicales; enfin, le rapport Taddei, qui propose des solutions originales pour la transition entre le travail et la retraite (...).

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Sciences Po in its series Sciences Po publications with number info:hdl:2441/5286.

in new window

Date of creation: Apr 2000
Publication status: Published in Revue de l'OFCE, 2000, pp.287-307
Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5286
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Henri Sterdyniak & Gaël Dupont & Alexis Dantec, 1999. "Les retraites en France : que faire ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 68(1), pages 19-81.
  2. Henri Sterdyniak, 1999. "Pour approfondir le débat, quarante remarques sur le rapport Charpin," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 70(1), pages 237-251.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Spire @ Sciences Po Library)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.