IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A Dynamic Non-Tatonnement Macroeconomic Model With Stochastic Rationing

Listed author(s):
  • Luca Colombo

    (Universita Cattolica Milano)

  • G. Weinrich

    (Universita Cattolica Milano)

  • F. Bignami

    (Universita Cattolica Milano)

The paper considers a dynamic macroeconomic model with stochastic quantity rationing. The economy is composed of overlapping-generations consumers, producers and a government who interact in a labor and a consumption goods market. Agents behave optimizing and trade in each period, even when prices are not at their Walrasian level. This is rendered possible by means of feasible allocations using the concept of temporary equilibrium with quantity rationing. We give a complete characterization of the typology of these equilibria (Keynesian, Inflationary, Classical, of Underemployment, as well as Walrasian). Moving to the dynamics of the model, prices and wages are adjusted following, alternatively, linear or non-linear adjustment rules. The size of price adjustment is based on the intensity of rationing, a reliable measure of which is obtained through stochastic rationing. This methodology allows us to encompass a wide variety of interesting economic circumstances, in particular the impact of various degrees of price and wage flexibility on the structural dynamic behavior of the model. Parameters such as the adjustment speed of prices and those referring to government policy are in fact decisive for the type of dynamics that emerges. The model, by providing an endogenous explanation of possible transitions between different (dis)equilibrium regimes, results to be a suitable framework for the analysis of alternative economic policies.Numerical simulations have shown that, contrary to what is commonly expected regarding the stabilizing effect of price flexibility, the economy can be subject to complex dynamics. By deviating from the Walrasian parameter set in some of the relevant parameters (initial conditions, technological coefficients, government policy instruments), the simulations establish the existence of complex and strange geometric objects. In particular it is possible to obtain dynamic phenomena like bifurcations and (strange) attractors. One of the attractors in the plane of wage inflation rate and unemployment rate displays a Phillips curve, which emerges by very construction as a true long-run phenomenon. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a Phillips curve generated as an attractor of a dynamical economic system. Also it emerges quite clearly that cycles of different order co-exist for the same parameter set, but for different initial conditions. Therefore, a minor variation in the initial state can drive the system to a completely different cycle or, in other words, there is sensitive dependence of the order of a cycle on initial conditions.Of particular interest in the context of our macroeconomic model is the impact of variations in the values of the government policy instruments. Here we make use of a new technical tool, called cartogram, which provides a concise visualization technique and permits to establish a relationship between the values of the relevant parameters and the structure of the resulting dynamics (although it is not able to distinguish between regular quasi-periodic behavior and ''true'' chaotic motion). As an economic result, the use of this tool suggests quite clearly that the stabilization of the economy by means of fiscal policies is a most delicate matter, even though there is a tendency for nominal wage stickiness to favor this goal.Finally, we show the existence of quasi-stationary states involving underemployment and underutilization of production capacities, proving that the flexibility of prices and wages per se is not sufficient to overcome situations of market imbalances. This is due to the spillover effects between the labor and the consumption goods market, and could not have been obtained in partial equilibrium models. For example, in a state of Keynesian underemployment, there is excess supply on both markets. Therefore both the goods price and the wage diminish. However, if both decrease in the same measure, their ratio (the real wage) remains constant. If, in addition, there is a government balance surplus, the money stock decreases. If this decrease is proportional to the one in price and wage, the real stock of money held by consumers does not change. Thus it is possible that, in addition to the real wage, also the real wealth of households remains constant. In these circumstances, no agent has any incentive to modify her decisions relative to the ones taken in the previous period. Therefore, the state of the economy is stationary with respect to its real variables, although the nominal ones do change.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 with number 198.

in new window

Date of creation: 05 Jul 2000
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:198
Contact details of provider: Postal:
CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain

Fax: +34 93 542 17 46
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. George A. Akerlof & Janet L. Yellen, 1985. "A Near-Rational Model of the Business Cycle, with Wage and Price Inertia," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 100(Supplemen), pages 823-838.
  2. Muellbauer, John & Portes, Richard, 1978. "Macroeconomic Models with Quantity Rationing," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 88(352), pages 788-821, December.
  3. Douglas Gale, 1981. "Large Economies with Trading Uncertainty: A Correction," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 363-364.
  4. Salop, Steven C, 1979. "A Model of the Natural Rate of Unemployment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 117-125, March.
  5. Jean-Pascal Benassy, 1976. "The Disequilibrium Approach to Monopolistic Price Setting and General Monopolistic Equilibrium," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 69-81.
  6. Jean-Pascal Benassy, 1975. "Neo-Keynesian Disequilibrium Theory in a Monetary Economy," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 503-523.
  7. Gerd Weinrich, 1997. "Endogenous fixprices and sticky price adjustment of risk-averse firms," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 283-305, October.
  8. Douglas Gale, 1979. "Large Economies with Trading Uncertainty," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 319-338.
  9. Solow, Robert M., 1979. "Another possible source of wage stickiness," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 79-82.
  10. Dreze, Jacques H, 1975. "Existence of an Exchange Equilibrium under Price Rigidities," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 16(2), pages 301-320, June.
  11. Bean, Charles R, 1994. "European Unemployment: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 573-619, June.
  12. Weinrich, Gerd, 1997. "Endogenous Fixprices and Sticky Price Adjustment of Risk-averse Firms," MPRA Paper 6302, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  13. Grandmont, Jean-Michel, 1993. "Temporary general equilibrium theory," Handbook of Mathematical Economics,in: K. J. Arrow & M.D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edition 4, volume 2, chapter 19, pages 879-922 Elsevier.
  14. Carlton, Dennis W, 1986. "The Rigidity of Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 637-658, September.
  15. Holmes, James M & Hutton, Patricia A, 1996. "Keynesian Involuntary Unemployment and Sticky Nominal Wages," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(439), pages 1564-1585, November.
  16. C. Weddepohl, 1999. "Price adjustment models in a production economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 89(0), pages 149-164, January.
  17. Honkapohja, Seppo & Ito, Takatoshi, 1985. " On Macroeconomic Equilibrium with Stochastic Rationing," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(1), pages 66-88.
  18. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1975. "An Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(6), pages 1113-1144, December.
  19. Shaked, Avner & Sutton, John, 1984. "Involuntary Unemployment as a Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(6), pages 1351-1364, November.
  20. Frank Hahn & Robert Solow, 1997. "A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026258154x, July.
  21. Shapiro, Carl & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1984. "Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(3), pages 433-444, June.
  22. Lucas, Robert Jr. & Prescott, Edward C., 1974. "Equilibrium search and unemployment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 188-209, February.
  23. Ball, Laurence & Romer, David, 1991. "Sticky Prices as Coordination Failure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 539-552, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.