IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rza/ersawp/360.html

Industrial-policy objectives in South African competition policy

Author

Listed:
  • Willem Boshoff

    (University of Stellenbosch)

Abstract

South African competition policy has long pursued industrial-policy objectives alongside its core competition mandate. Public-interest considerations were embedded in merger control from 1998, and the 2018 amendments gave them equal legal status with the competition assessment. These developments preceded the current European debate on using competition policy to advance innovation and other industrial policy objectives in the EU. This paper examines how industrial-policy objectives have been pursued in South African competition policy over the past thirty years. In merger control, these are often advanced through conditions involving ESOPs, HDP ownership commitments, and supplier and enterprise-development funds, as well as through potential-competition theories of merger harm. They are also advanced by similar types of remedies following market inquiries and, increasingly, abuse and cartel investigations.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem Boshoff, 2026. "Industrial-policy objectives in South African competition policy," ERSA Working Paper Series 360, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    • Handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/article/view/360/212
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Haucap, Justus & Rasch, Alexander & Stiebale, Joel, 2019. "How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 283-325.
    3. Mitsuru Igami & Kosuke Uetake, 2020. "Mergers, Innovation, and Entry-Exit Dynamics: Consolidation of the Hard Disk Drive Industry, 1996–2016," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(6), pages 2672-2702.
    4. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane & Dani Rodrik, 2024. "The New Economics of Industrial Policy," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 213-242, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lefouili, Yassine & Madio, Leonardo, 2026. "Mergers and investments: Where do we stand?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Bennato, Anna Rita & Davies, Stephen & Mariuzzo, Franco & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Mergers and innovation: Evidence from the hard disk drive market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Gugler, Klaus & Szücs, Florian & Wohak, Ulrich, 2025. "Start-up acquisitions, venture capital and innovation: A comparative study of Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Christian Stutz & Saara Matala, 2026. "Manufacturing national consent for industrial policy: a microhistorical analysis of Finnish shipbuilding," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 57(4), pages 597-617, June.
    5. Haucap, Justus & Stiebale, Joel, 2023. "Non-price effects of mergers and acquisitions," DICE Discussion Papers 402, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Suguru Otani, 2024. "Industry Dynamics with Cartels: The Case of the Container Shipping Industry," Discussion Paper Series DP2024-28, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    7. Field, Lottie, 2024. "The political economy of industrial development organisations: are they run by politicians or bureaucrats?," SocArXiv a4ker, Center for Open Science.
    8. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:679-686 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    11. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    12. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi & Giacomo Cucignatto & Dario Guarascio, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," CIMEO Working Paper Series 173, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    13. repec:ocp:rpecon:rp_05-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    15. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    16. Deli Wang & Yan Wang & Minxian Zhou, 2025. "Can environmental tax promote green M&A in emerging market firms? Evidence from China's heavy polluters," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1450-1474, October.
    17. Francesco Molica, 2025. "Reassessing Cohesion Policy Through the Lens of the New EU Industrial Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 302-319, January.
    18. Cheang, Bryan, 2024. "Why mission-directed governance risks authoritarianism: lessons from East Asia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125640, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Md Saifur Rahman & Md Faisal Abedin Khan & Lukas Giessen, 2024. "Analysing policy changes for achieving sustainable development goals: Insights from forest, environment and climate change action plan in Bangladesh," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 508-524, May.
    20. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    21. repec:ags:cfcp15:344392 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    23. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maggi Sigg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.