IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rri/wpaper/2006wp06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality of Care in Appalachian Nursing Homes: Doing More with Less?

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Carter

    (Department of Health Science, Towson University)

  • Shuhui Wang

    (Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University)

Abstract

Despite comprising nearly 10% of the nation’s nursing home population, little is known about the quality of care provided by nursing homes located in rural Appalachia. However, anecdotal evidences suggests that the economic disadvantages associated with the Appalachian region may lead to higher concentrations of certain structural and organizational attributes previously shown to affect nursing home quality. In response, this study sought to examine empirically whether nursing homes located in Appalachia differ in the number of deficiency citations received in comparison with nursing homes located elsewhere, and to explore the extent to which factors other than quality of care determine nursing home survey outcomes. A secondary-data analysis using the Online Survey Certification and Reporting System was conducted. The most recently available survey conducted between March 2000 and February 2003 were used, providing 16,439 facility-level observations for analysis. Robust regression and spatial analysis techniques were used to examine quality differences. Results indicate that wide variation across regions and even within states exist in the patterns of deficiency citation issued to nursing homes, and that a substantial proportion of this variation is associated with structural and organizational factors, rather than true quality of care differences. Before regional differences in nursing home quality of care can be understood and subsequently addressed, further effort is needed to investigate the extent to which regional differences in the survey process itself systematically affect conclusions about nursing home quality of care performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Carter & Shuhui Wang, 2006. "Quality of Care in Appalachian Nursing Homes: Doing More with Less?," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-06, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
  • Handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2006wp06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/rri_pubs/93/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fuguitt, Glenn V. & Beale, Calvin L. & Tordella, Stephen J., 2002. "Recent Trends in Older Population Change and Migration for Nonmetro Areas, 1970-2000," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(3), September.
    2. William D. Spector & Thomas M. Selden & Joel W. Cohen, 1998. "The impact of ownership type on nursing home outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(7), pages 639-653, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chou, Shin-Yi, 2002. "Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 293-311, March.
    2. David C. Grabowski & Edward C. Norton, 2012. "Nursing Home Quality of Care," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ben-Ner Avner & Karaca-Mandic Pinar & Ren Ting, 2012. "Ownership and Quality in Markets with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Nursing Homes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, October.
    4. repec:rri:wpaper:200606 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Michael Alexeev & Ivan Dedyukhin & Leonid Polishchuk, 2024. "Ownership, Asymmetric Information, and Quality of Care for the Elderly: Evidence from US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic," CAEPR Working Papers 2024-006 Classification-, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    6. Pierre Koning & Joëlle Noailly & Sabine Visser, 2007. "Do non-profits make a difference? Evaluating non-profit vis-à-vis for-profit organisations in social services," CPB Document 142, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Stijn Van Puyvelde & Ralf Caers & Cind Du Bois & Marc Jegers, 2015. "Does organizational ownership matter? Objectives of employees in public, nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(24), pages 2500-2513, May.
    8. Eric Christensen & Richard Arnould, 2005. "The Impact of Asymmetric Information and Ownership on Nursing Home Access," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 273-297, September.
    9. Dwayne Banks & Elliott Parker & Jeanne Wendel, 2001. "Strategic interaction among hospitals and nursing facilities: the efficiency effects of payment systems and vertical integration," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 119-134, March.
    10. Laura Di Giorgio & Massimo Filippini & Giuliano Masiero, 2014. "The relationship between costs and quality in nonprofit nursing homes," IdEP Economic Papers 1402, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    11. Grabowski, David C. & Hirth, Richard A., 2003. "Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Andrew T. Ching & Fumiko Hayashi & Hui Wang, 2015. "Quantifying The Impacts Of Limited Supply: The Case Of Nursing Homes," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1291-1322, November.
    13. Virender Kumar & Edward Norton & William Encinosa, 2006. "OBRA 1987 and the quality of nursing home care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 49-81, March.
    14. Patricia K. Tong, 2011. "The effects of California minimum nurse staffing laws on nurse labor and patient mortality in skilled nursing facilities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 802-816, July.
    15. Dewaelheyns, Nico & Eeckloo, Kristof & Van Herck, Gustaaf & Van Hulle, Cynthia & Vleugels, Arthur, 2009. "Do non-profit nursing homes separate governance roles?: The impact of size and ownership characteristics," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 188-195, May.
    16. L. Di Giorgio & M. Filippini & G. Masiero, 2016. "Is higher nursing home quality more costly?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 1011-1026, November.
    17. Martin, Cécile, 2014. "Concurrence, prix et qualité de la prise en charge en EHPAD en France : Analyses micro-économétriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/13712 edited by Dormont, Brigitte.
    18. repec:rre:publsh:v:37:y:2007:i:2:p:251-78 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pierre Koning & Joëlle Noailly & Sabine Visser, 2007. "Do Not-For-Profits Make a Difference in Social Services? A Survey Study," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 251-270, September.
    20. Xu, Mengyi & Yan, Gaoyun, 2025. "Length of stay in residential aged care: Patterns and determinants from a population-based cohort study," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 214-229.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2006wp06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Randall Jackson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rrwvuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.