IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rii/riidoc/205.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une analyse socio-économique de l’entreprise artisanale. Méthodologie, fondements théoriques et enquêtes sur le terrain (A socioeconomic analysis of the craft enterprise methodology, theoretical foundations and application

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie BOUTILLIER,
  • Claude FOURNIER

    (labrii, ULCO)

Abstract

Nous exposons dans ce texte notre méthodologie pour l’étude de l’entreprise artisanale ou de la très petite entreprise. Cette méthodologie est construite sur deux binômes grande entreprise / entreprise artisanale et entrepreneur générique / entrepreneur-artisan. L’économie des pays industriels est fondée sur la grande entreprise (entreprise fordiste), et d’un autre côté l’analyse de l’économie industrielle privilégie les économies d’échelle et la production de masse. Aussi la grande entreprise est notre point de repère à partir duquel nous analysons l’entreprise artisanale en raison de son poids économique. D’un autre côté, avec le binôme entrepreneur générique / entrepreneur artisan nous analysons l’entrepreneur-artisan comme l’entrepreneur générique. L’entrepreneur-artisan (contrairement au dirigeant de la grande entreprise) cumule les fonctions de propriétaire et de gestionnaire. La présentation de cette méthodologie est illustrée par l’étude de deux sujets : les valeurs sociales et culturelles de l’entrepreneur-artisan et le statut juridique du conjoint dans l’entreprise artisanale. We present in this paper our methodology for analysing small-scale and very small-scale enterprises. Our strategy presents a bifurcation, with large-scale (Fordist) enterprises juxtaposed against small-scale and very-small scale enterprises. Because the economies of industrial countries tend to be prominently represented by large-scale enterprises engaged in mass production, small and very small-scale enterprises within those economies tend to be differentiated on the basis of capitalization and management differences. Within this context, two distinguishing characteristics of small and very small-scale enterprises become prominent features of our analysis: enterprise legal status and spousal status of the entrepreneur.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie BOUTILLIER, & Claude FOURNIER, 2009. "Une analyse socio-économique de l’entreprise artisanale. Méthodologie, fondements théoriques et enquêtes sur le terrain (A socioeconomic analysis of the craft enterprise methodology, theoretical found," Working Papers 205, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    • Handle: RePEc:rii:riidoc:205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://riifr.univ-littoral.fr/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/doc-205.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodolphe Durand & Jean-Luc Arrègle & Philippe Very, 2004. "Origines du capital social et avantages concurrentiels des firmes familiales," Post-Print hal-00699291, HAL.
    2. Henri Jorda, 2007. "Du paternalisme au managerialisme :les entreprises en quête de responsabilité sociale (Towards corporate social responsability)," Working Papers 143, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    3. Robert Paturel & Katia Richomme-Huet, 2007. "Le devenir de l'activité artisanale passe-t-il par l'activité entrepreneuriale ?," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 6(1), pages 29-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominique Barbelivien, 2014. "La structuration du système de pilotage de la performance au sein d'une ETI la différencie-t-elle de la PME ? Le cas d'une ETI familiale du Grand Ouest," Working Papers hal-00934226, HAL.
    2. Miron Vasile-Cristian-Ioachim, 2015. "Social Responsability And Corporate Governance In Evaluating The Performance Of Economic Entities," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 151-159, October.
    3. Dominique Barbelivien & François Meyssonnier, 2016. "La structuration du contrôle de gestion dans trois ETI familiales et industrielles," Post-Print hal-01901076, HAL.
    4. Dominique Barbelivien, 2016. "Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises familiales : un contrôle non-financiarisé ?," Working Papers hal-01295044, HAL.
    5. Omrane, Amina, 2022. "The main determinants and effects of product innovation: An exploratory study on the pastry companies of the region of Sfax (in Tunisia)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Catherine De La Robertie, 2016. "Top Managers Networking Influence on Competitive Intelligence Practices: the Case of Hi-Tech SMBs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 158-169.
    7. Paulette Robic & Dominique Barbelivien & Nicolas Antheaume, 2015. "Comment cultiver une ressource ? Outils de gestion et culture du familiness," Working Papers hal-01180952, HAL.
    8. Cisneros, Luis & Deschamps, Bérangère & Chirita, Gabriel M. & Geindre, Sébastien, 2022. "Successful family firm succession: Transferring external social capital to a shared-leadership team of siblings," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3).
    9. Paulette Robic & Dominique Barbelivien & Nicolas Antheaume, 2013. "La fabrique de l'entrepreneur familial. Une institutionnalisation du processus de transmission comme facteur de pérennité des entreprises familiales," Working Papers hal-00829947, HAL.
    10. Dominique Barbelivien, 2016. "Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises familiales : un contrôle non-financiarisé ?," Post-Print hal-01900593, HAL.
    11. Nicolas Antheaume & Paulette Robic & Dominique Barbelivien, 2012. "French Family Business and Longevity. Have they been conducting sustainable development policies before it became a fashion?," Working Papers hal-00694378, HAL.
    12. Dominique Barbelivien, 2014. "La Structuration Du Systeme De Pilotage De La Performance Au Sein D’Une Eti La Differencie-T-Elle De La Pme ? Le Cas D’Une Eti Familiale Du Grand Ouest," Post-Print hal-01899733, HAL.
    13. Sophie Boutillier & Claude Fournier, 2008. "La responsabilité sociale des entreprises artisanales. Résultats d’une enquête menée dans la région NPDC (France) Corporate social responsibility of craft enterprises Case study in thr Nord/Pas-de-Cal," Working Papers 192, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    14. Florence de Ferran & Jeanne Lallement & Isabelle Sueur, 2012. "L'éco-construction : quel positionnement pour les artisans ?," Post-Print hal-01488476, HAL.
    15. Sophie BOUTILLIER, 2010. "L’artisan entre histoire et theorie economique (Craftsman between history and economic theory)," Working Papers 226, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    16. Maxence Fontanel & Jacques Fontanel, 2013. "L’intelligence économique, une activité d’intérêt public et privé," Post-Print hal-02089630, HAL.
    17. Dominique Barbelivien & François Meyssonnier, 2016. "La structuration du contrôle de gestion dans trois ETI familiales et industrielles," Working Papers hal-01295039, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rii:riidoc:205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philippe Chagnon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rilitfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.