IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/wpaper/140.html

Geopolitical Fragmentation and the Geography of 5G Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Koski, Heli

Abstract

This study examines how the U.S.–China technological rivalry reshapes inventive collaboration in core 5G infrastructure technologies. Using 106,117 priority patent applications filed by leading 5G patenting firms between 2010 and 2023, we construct patent-level measures of inventor collaboration and diversity across geopolitical blocs. To identify the effects of geopolitical fragmentation, we exploit differences in firms’ pre-existing exposure to cross-bloc inventor integration and the changes in global cross-bloc co-invention over time. Geopolitical fragmentation significantly reduces cross-bloc inventor integration. Firms with greater pre-existing exposure to cross-bloc knowledge recombination experience larger declines in collaboration as fragmentation intensifies. A one-standard-deviation increase in the fragmentation shock reduces the likelihood of collaboration between U.S. and Chinese inventors by 2.1 percentage points, or roughly one quarter relative to the sample mean. Fragmentation also reduces inventor diversity and the share of inventors from rival geopolitical blocs, with the most pervasive and statistically robust effects observed among Chinese companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Koski, Heli, 2026. "Geopolitical Fragmentation and the Geography of 5G Innovation," ETLA Working Papers 140, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    • Handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/ETLA-Working-Papers-140.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Lia Sheer, 2021. "Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 871-898, March.
    2. Anil K. Gupta & Vijay Govindarajan, 2000. "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 473-496, April.
    3. Wilbur Chung & Juan Alcácer, 2002. "Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1534-1554, December.
    4. Paul Almeida & Bruce Kogut, 1999. "Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 905-917, July.
    5. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    6. Ernst, Dieter & Kim, Linsu, 2002. "Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1417-1429, December.
    7. Lind, Nelson & Ramondo, Natalia, 2024. "Global knowledge and trade flows: Theory and measurement," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kafouros, Mario I. & Buckley, Peter J. & Clegg, Jeremy, 2012. "The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 848-861.
    2. Heather Berry & Aseem Kaul, 2015. "Global Sourcing and Foreign Knowledge Seeking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1052-1071, May.
    3. Britta Glennon, 2024. "How Do Restrictions on High-Skilled Immigration Affect Offshoring? Evidence from the H-1B Program," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 907-930, February.
    4. René Belderbos & Boris Lokshin & Federico Michiel, 2021. "R&D and Foreign Subsidiary Performance at or Below the Technology Frontier," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 745-767, December.
    5. Singh, Jasjit, 2008. "Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 77-96, February.
    6. Pengfei Li & Harald Bathelt, 2018. "Location strategy in cluster networks," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(8), pages 967-989, October.
    7. Yuzhe Miao & Robert M. Salomon & Jaeyong Song, 2021. "Learning from Technologically Successful Peers: The Convergence of Asian Laggards to the Technology Frontier," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 210-232, January.
    8. Wang, Elizabeth Yi & Kafouros, Mario, 2020. "Location still matters! How does geographic configuration influence the performance-enhancing advantages of FDI spillovers?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    9. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2019. "Geographically Dispersed Technological Capability Building and MNC Innovative Performance: The Role of Intra-firm Flows of Newly Absorbed Knowledge," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 1-1.
    10. Schmiele, Anja, 2009. "Drivers for international innovation activities in developed and emerging countries," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-064, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Felipe Monteiro & Julian Birkinshaw, 2017. "The external knowledge sourcing process in multinational corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 342-362, February.
    12. Victor Cui & Rajneesh Narula & Dana Minbaeva & Ilan Vertinsky, 2022. "Towards integrating country- and firm-level perspectives on intellectual property rights," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1880-1894, December.
    13. Pranpreya Sriwannawit & Ulf Sandström, 2015. "Large-scale bibliometric review of diffusion research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1615-1645, February.
    14. Yamin, Mo. & Otto, Juliet, 2004. "Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 239-258.
    15. Anja Schmiele, 2012. "Drivers for international innovation activities in developed and emerging countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 98-123, February.
    16. Sverre Herstad & Øyvind Pålshaugen & Bernd Ebersberger, 2011. "Industrial Innovation Collaboration in a Capital Region Context," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(4), pages 507-532, December.
    17. Stefano Baruffaldi & Felix Poege, 2025. "Like Stars: How Firms Learn at Scientific Conferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2056-2078, March.
    18. Olivier Bertrand & Laurence Capron, 2015. "Productivity enhancement at home via cross-border acquisitions: The roles of learning and contemporaneous domestic investments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 640-658, May.
    19. Eunkwang Seo & Hyo Kang & Jaeyong Song, 0. "Blending talents for innovation: Team composition for cross-border R&D collaboration within multinational corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-35.
    20. Smeets, Roger & Bosker, E.M., 2011. "Leaders, laggards and technology seeking strategies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 481-497.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:wpaper:140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.