Further Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins
In a recent, and widely cited, paper, Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994) use a new sample of identical twins to investigate the contribution of genetic ability to the observed cross-sectional return to schooling. This paper re-examines Ashenfelter and Kruegerâ€™s estimates using three additional years of the same twins survey. I find that the return to schooling among identical twins is about 10 percent per year of schooling completed. Most importantly, unlike the results reported in Ashenfelter and Krueger, I find that the within- twin regression estimate of the effect of schooling on the log wage is smaller than the cross-sectional estimate, implying a small upward bias in the cross-sectional estimate. Ashenfelter and Kruegerâ€™s measurement error corrected estimates are insignificantly different from those presented here, however. Finally, there is evidence of an important individual-speciï¬ c component to the measurement error in schooling reports.
|Date of creation:||Jul 1997|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Firestone Library, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-2098|
Phone: 609 258-4041
Fax: 609 258-2907
Web page: http://www.irs.princeton.edu/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bobray Bordelon)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.