IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Socially responsible investment and Shariah-compliant investment compared: Can investors benefit from diversification? An ARDL approach


  • Chowdhury, Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous
  • Masih, Mansur


Islamic finance and Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) have been two of the most rapidly growing areas of finance over the last two decades. During this period, they have each grown at rates that far exceed that of the financial markets as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to take a comparative approach in comparing and contrasting the performance of both types of restricted investment portfolios by using ARDL bounds testing approach. The paper provides an innovative view to two different markets and suggests that there are commonalities which need to be exploited for the benefit of both markets. The study assesses the extent of correlation between social responsible investment funds and Sharia compliant investment funds in different economic situations to determine if the nature of relationship between funds changes in between the non-crisis period and the 2007 crisis period for four markets such as Dow Jones Islamic World, Dow Jones Islamic Europe; Dow Jones Sustainability World and Dow Jones Sustainability Europe. By estimating the short and long term dynamics between the socially responsible investment indexes and Islamic indexes, and the extent of cointegration between these two funds, the findings tend to indicate that the SRI and Islamic funds have significantly different behavior in both the short run and long run. Despite the differences in the screening criteria and portfolio management of both types of funds, this study suggests that the potential diversification benefits between Sharia compliant funds and the SRI funds are possible both in the crisis period and non-crisis period.

Suggested Citation

  • Chowdhury, Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous & Masih, Mansur, 2015. "Socially responsible investment and Shariah-compliant investment compared: Can investors benefit from diversification? An ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 65828, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:65828

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Hussein, Khaled A., 2004. "Ethical Investment: Empirical Evidence From Ftse Islamic Index," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 12, pages 22-40.
    2. Fikriyah Abdullah & Taufiq Hassan & Shamsher Mohamad, 2007. "Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds," Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 33(2), pages 142-153, January.
    3. Bauer, Rob & Koedijk, Kees & Otten, Roger, 2005. "International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1751-1767, July.
    4. Zakri Y. Bello, 2005. "Socially Responsible Investing And Portfolio Diversification," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 41-57.
    5. Karen Benson & Timothy Brailsford & Jacquelyn Humphrey, 2006. "Do Socially Responsible Fund Managers Really Invest Differently?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 337-357, June.
    6. Alan Gregory & Julie Whittaker, 2007. "Performance and Performance Persistence of 'Ethical' Unit Trusts in the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7-8), pages 1327-1344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Isaev, Mirolim & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "The nexus of private sector foreign debt, unemployment, trade openness: evidence from Australia," MPRA Paper 79423, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item


    Sharia-compliant; socially responsible investments; diversification; ARDL;

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • P5 - Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:65828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.