IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A comparison of three mega bank groups’ strategies towards a low carbon economy focusing on activities of their securities companies

  • Kasai, Katsuya

This paper analysed Japan’s top three mega bank groups’ activities towards a low carbon economy by focusing on their securities companies. The three groups, namely MUFG, SMFG and MHFG, have enormously influenced, not only in Japan’s economy, but the global economy owing to their sizes. Overall, this paper confirmed that the three mega bank groups have been trying to promote environmental business through their services as leading financial institutions. Moreover, they have utilized not only financial products, but other various environmental activities as well. When comparing their comprehensive activities, their activities are similar but this paper revealed clear differences among their strategies. The defining characteristic of each group’s strategy is: MUFG is likely to focus heavily on the project development and emission trading business; SMBC seems to focus on eco funds; and MHFG might not work on climate change issue very hard owing to their system troubles. In this paper, various promising activities have been identified, all of which should be appreciated equally with SRI. The three mega bank groups surely have powers that can change the social systems. It would be beneficial for both the three groups and society to continue to expand their activities for a low carbon economy by pursuing their own strategy. Looking back at history, humankind has improved quality of life by making innovation happen, such as the industrial and green revolutions. Hence, it is hoped that three groups will provide their companies with enough funds to promptly and efficiently stipulate the development of clean projects and/or the invention of innovative technologies. In some sense, inducing innovation is thought of as the most important key for clearing up the root of the climate change issue.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 52239.

in new window

Date of creation: Mar 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:52239
Contact details of provider: Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Ronald Hill & Thomas Ainscough & Todd Shank & Daryl Manullang, 2007. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 165-174, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:52239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.