IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/49299.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'anomalia nella PAC: eterogeneità e dinamiche del Leader in Italia
[The anomaly of the CAP: heterogeneity and dynamics of Leader in Italy]

Author

Listed:
  • Mantino, Francesco

Abstract

This book describes how the Leader approach has changed in the Italian rural development policies. The first chapter delas with the overall evolution of the Leader programme between Leader II and Leader+. The second chapter focuses on the main results of the Leader approach over the years and the main lessons we can draw from the implementation of the approach. The third chapter describes the main novelties of this approach in the 2007-2013 programming period in Italy and how different was the implementation in the Italian regionalised system. The fourth chapter highlights the strategies pursued by Local Action Groups in Italy over the time.Finally, the fifth chapter focuses on the role of the National Network in promoting and supporting the development of this approach in the Italian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Mantino, Francesco, 2009. "L'anomalia nella PAC: eterogeneità e dinamiche del Leader in Italia [The anomaly of the CAP: heterogeneity and dynamics of Leader in Italy]," MPRA Paper 49299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:49299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49299/1/MPRA_paper_49299.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco, Mantino, 2006. "Evaluating Structural, Territorial and Institutional Impacts of Rural Development Policies in Italy: Some Lessons for the Future Programming Period (2007-2013)," MPRA Paper 50355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Francesco, Mantino, 2006. "Integrated Rural Development Programmes and Projects: An Assessment of the Italian case," MPRA Paper 50602, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Gargano, 2021. "The Bottom-Up Development Model as a Governance Instrument for the Rural Areas. The Cases of Four Local Action Groups (LAGs) in the United Kingdom and in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-47, August.
    2. Ángela Engelmo Moriche & Ana Nieto Masot & Julián Mora Aliseda, 2021. "Economic Sustainability of Touristic Offer Funded by Public Initiatives in Spanish Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwyer, Janet & Clark, Mike & Kirwan, James & Kambites, Carol & Lewis, Nick & Molnarova, Anna & Thompson, Ken & Mantino, Francesco & Tarangioli, Serena & Monteleone, Alessandro & Bolli, Martina & Fagia, 2008. "Review of Rural Development Instruments: DG Agri project 2006-G4-10. Final Report," MPRA Paper 50290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mantino, Francesco, 2011. "Developing a Territorial Approach for the CAP," Working Papers 183564, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Rural Development Policies.
    3. Esposti, Roberto, 2008. "Reforming The Cap: An Agenda For Regional Growth?," 109th Seminar, November 20-21, 2008, Viterbo, Italy 44868, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rural Development; Local Action Groups; local development policies; rural networks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:49299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.