IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128988.html

Dialektik 'UpSkilling' dan Pendemokrasian Kemahiran: Analisis Konseptual Dialektik 'UpSkilling' dan Pendemokrasian Kemahiran: Analisis Konseptual Perubahan Teknologi Berpincang Kemahiran (Skill-Biased Technological Change) terhadap Modal Insan di Sabah
[Dialectics of Upskilling and the Democratization of Skills: A Conceptual Analysis of Skill-Biased Technological Change and Its Impact on Human Capital in Sabah]

Author

Listed:
  • Aqilah, Aryatul

Abstract

Transformasi teknologi global yang dipacu oleh kemajuan pesat dalam automasi, kecerdasan buatan, dan digitalisasi ekonomi telah memperkukuh fenomena “Skill-Biased Technological Change” (SBTC) yang secara sistematik meningkatkan permintaan terhadap tenaga kerja berkemahiran tinggi. Transformasi ini turut memperluas jurang ketidaksamaan dalam pasaran buruh global dan mencabar struktur pembangunan modal insan di wilayah membangun. Dalam konteks ini, pendekatan “upskilling” sering diketengahkan sebagai strategi dominan bagi meningkatkan daya saing tenaga kerja, namun pendekatan tersebut dikritik kerana cenderung mengabaikan kekangan struktural yang mengehadkan akses kepada peluang pembelajaran. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mensintesis secara kritis hubungan dialektik antara “upskilling” dan pendemokrasian kemahiran, dengan fokus terhadap implikasi SBTC terhadap pembangunan modal insan di Sabah, Malaysia. Pendekatan ulasan naratif digunakan dengan menganalisis literatur daripada pangkalan data Scopus, Web of Science, dan Google Scholar bagi tempoh 2010 hingga 2025, serta mengaplikasikan analisis tematik refleksif berdasarkan Braun dan Clarke (2006). Dapatan mengenal pasti empat tema utama, iaitu landskap global SBTC, ketidaksamaan kemahiran dalam konteks Sabah, kapasiti institusi, dan evolusi dasar pembangunan tenaga kerja. Sintesis menunjukkan bahawa keberkesanan upskilling adalah terhad tanpa pendekatan inklusif yang menekankan pendemokrasian kemahiran. Oleh itu, artikel ini mencadangkan kerangka hibrid yang mengintegrasikan kecekapan ekonomi dan keadilan sosial sebagai asas kepada strategi pembangunan modal insan yang lebih inklusif dan lestari.

Suggested Citation

  • Aqilah, Aryatul, 2026. "Dialektik 'UpSkilling' dan Pendemokrasian Kemahiran: Analisis Konseptual Dialektik 'UpSkilling' dan Pendemokrasian Kemahiran: Analisis Konseptual Perubahan Teknologi Berpincang Kemahiran (Skill-Biased Technological Change) terhadap Modal Insan di Sab," MPRA Paper 128988, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128988/1/MPRA_paper_128988.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    2. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Goldmann & Michael Knörzer, 2023. "Technology advancement propels work productivity: Empirical efficiency potential determination in marketing and sales," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1962-1977, June.
    2. Amr S. Abdallah & Hala Amin & Mohammed Abdelghany & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2025. "Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: a systematic review, integrated framework, and agenda for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3067-3118, December.
    3. Samantha A. Sharpe & Cristina M. Martinez-Fernandez, 2021. "The Implications of Green Employment: Making a Just Transition in ASEAN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Tommaso AGASISTI & Geraint JOHNES & Marco PACCAGNELLA, 2021. "Tasks, occupations and wages in OECD countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(1), pages 85-112, March.
    5. Katrin Huber & Geske Rolvering, 2023. "Public child care and mothers’ career trajectories," Working Papers 228, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    6. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Conny Wunsch & Felix Rochlitz & Patrick Arni, 2025. "Jobseekers’ skills and job search behaviour," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 161(1), pages 1-31, December.
    8. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Growth, Inequality and Declining Business Dynamism in a Unified Schumpeter Mark I + II Model," Papers 2111.09407, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    9. Nicholas Bloom & Tarek Alexander Hassan & Aakash Kalyani & Josh Lerner & Ahmed Tahoun, 2021. "The diffusion of disruptive technologies," CEP Discussion Papers dp1798, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Keller, Wolfgang & Utar, Hale, 2023. "International trade and job polarization: Evidence at the worker level," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Jaime Arellano-Bover & Carolina Bussotti & Matteo Paradisi & Liangjie Wu, 2026. "The Labor Demand Implications of Brand Capital: Evidence from Trademark Transactions," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26079, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    13. J. Bradford Jensen & Lori G. Kletzer, 2010. "Measuring Tradable Services and the Task Content of Offshorable Services Jobs," NBER Chapters, in: Labor in the New Economy, pages 309-335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Rabensteiner, Thomas & Guschanski, Alexander, 2022. "Autonomy and wage divergence: evidence from European survey data," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37925, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    16. Iftekhairul Islam & Fahad Shaon, 2020. "If the Prospect of Some Occupations Are Stagnating With Technological Advancement? A Task Attribute Approach to Detect Employment Vulnerability," Papers 2001.02783, arXiv.org.
    17. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    18. Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Dev, Dhairya, 2025. "Crude oil Price forecasting: Leveraging machine learning for global economic stability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Nunes, Ashley, 2016. "Increased productivity efforts yield few rewards in the knowledge economy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 338-347.
    20. Lex Borghans & Bas ter Weel, 2011. "Computers, skills and wages," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(29), pages 4607-4622.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.