IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/126499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mining Revenues and Institutional Weakness: The Political Economy of the DRC’s 0.3% Community Development Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Ngunza Maniata, Kevin
  • Mukadi Mukandila, Caleb Bonyi

Abstract

This paper analyzes the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) legal requirement that mining companies allocate 0.3 percent of annual turnover to local community development. Drawing on the 2025 audit of forty-four community development funds by the Court of Auditors, the study reveals systematic underreporting of revenues, delayed or missing payments, weak financial management, and the absence of sanctions between 2018 and 2023. Using institutional economics and principal–agent theory, it shows how asymmetric information, misaligned incentives, and political interference undermine the system’s effectiveness. Comparative evidence from Peru’s canon minero and Ghana’s Mineral Development Fund demonstrates that success depends less on legal design than on credible verification, coordination, and community oversight. The paper proposes reforms to strengthen enforcement, transparency, and accountability in the DRC’s mining governance framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngunza Maniata, Kevin & Mukadi Mukandila, Caleb Bonyi, 2025. "Mining Revenues and Institutional Weakness: The Political Economy of the DRC’s 0.3% Community Development Fund," MPRA Paper 126499, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/126499/1/MPRA_paper_126499.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
    • Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:126499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.