IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/110547.html

Crowdfunding catalyseur de l’entrepreneuriat : Cas du Maroc
[Crowdfunding, a catalyst of entrepreneurship: Case of Morocco]

Author

Listed:
  • Liouaeddine, Mariem
  • Naji, Faïrouz

Abstract

This article aims to show how crowdfunding can be a catalyst for entrepreneurship in Morocco. To this end, we propose to elucidate, first of all, the concept of crowdfunding, its mode of operation, and its different typologies. Second, we highlight the state of play of crowdfunding and its development around the world. Finally, we show how the use of crowdfunding can be a lever for the promotion of entrepreneurial initiatives in Morocco and we discuss the obstacles that hinder the use of Moroccan entrepreneurs to this technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Liouaeddine, Mariem & Naji, Faïrouz, 2018. "Crowdfunding catalyseur de l’entrepreneuriat : Cas du Maroc [Crowdfunding, a catalyst of entrepreneurship: Case of Morocco]," MPRA Paper 110547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:110547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/110547/1/MPRA_paper_110547.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belleflamme, Paul & Omrani, Nessrine & Peitz, Martin, 2015. "The economics of crowdfunding platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 11-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    2. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2018. "Crowdfunding with overenthusiastic investors : a global game model," ESSEC Working Papers WP1802, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    3. Miglo, Anton, 2022. "FinTech Development in Greater Manchester: An Overview," MPRA Paper 111348, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Maja Tihole & Sabina Taškar Beloglavec, 2018. "Ethics in Banks’ Publicly Accessible Documents: The Case of Slovenia," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, ejme_v1_i.
    5. Xin Tang & Haibing Lu & Wei Huang & Shulin Liu, 2023. "Investment decisions and pricing strategies of crowdfunding players: In a two-sided crowdfunding market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1209-1240, June.
    6. Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Martin Angerer & Ferdinand Thies & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2019. "More is not always better—non-linear effects in crowdfunding," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Swati Gupta & Sahil Raj & Sanjay Gupta & Ajay Sharma, 2023. "Prioritising crowdfunding benefits: a fuzzy-AHP approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 379-403, February.
    8. Xie, Xueyan & Zhu, Xiaoyang, 2022. "FinTech and capital allocation efficiency: Another equity-efficiency dilemma?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Bertsch, Christoph & Hull, Isaiah & Zhang, Xin, 2016. "Fed Liftoff and Subprime Loan Interest Rates: Evidence from the Peer-to-Peer Lending Market," Working Paper Series 319, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
    10. Johannes Wallmeroth & Peter Wirtz & Alexander Peter Groh, 2017. "Institutional Seed Financing, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review," Working Papers hal-01527999, HAL.
    11. Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2022. "Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(5), pages 1399-1417.
    12. Thomas Clauss & Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Patrick Schnetzer & Alexander Brem, 2019. "Increasing Crowdfunding Success Through Social Media: The Importance Of Reach And Utilisation In Reward-Based Crowdfunding," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-30, May.
    13. Bingyou Chen & Yu Luo & Jieni Li & Yujian Li & Ying Liu & Fan Yang & Junge Bo & Yanan Qiao, 2023. "Blockchain-based Decentralized Co-governance: Innovations and Solutions for Sustainable Crowdfunding," Papers 2306.00869, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    14. Francis Kwaku Kuma & Mohd Effandi Bin Yusoff & Paul Kwasi Apreku-Djan, 2024. "A Synthesis of Crowdfunding Concepts in the Ghanaian Context: Crowdfunding Information Challenges in Ghana," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 435-460, March.
    15. Olena Havrylchyk, 2018. "Regulatory framework for the loan-based crowdfunding platforms," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1513, OECD Publishing.
    16. Georgiana-Loredana Schipor (Frecea), 2020. "Exploring the Crowdfunding Revolution: Reaching the Right Goal," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1029-1036, August.
    17. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.
    18. Cervantes-Zacarés, Desamparados & Martí-Sánchez, Myriam & Pascual-Soler, Marcos & Berné-Martínez, José-Miguel, 2023. "The relevance of crowdfunding in the entrepreneurial framework from a specialized media perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Sylvain Dejean, 2019. "The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: evidence from France," Working Papers hal-01645147, HAL.
    20. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:110547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.