IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/105790.html

Core equivalence in presence of satiation and indivisibilities

Author

Listed:
  • Bhowmik, Anuj
  • Dharanan, GVA

Abstract

Equivalence between rejective core and set of dividend equilibria allocations is studied in finite economy and double infinity economy frameworks in presence of indivisibilities of commodities while also allowing the presence of satiated agents. It is further shown that in the finite economy and the double infinity economy, the core of every renegotiation core, the rejective core of every replica economy and the set of dividend equilibria are identical. Hence, core equivalence is demonstrated in both frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhowmik, Anuj & Dharanan, GVA, 2021. "Core equivalence in presence of satiation and indivisibilities," MPRA Paper 105790, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:105790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105790/1/MPRA_paper_105790.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Samuelson, 1958. "An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(6), pages 467-467.
    2. Gerard Debreu, 1963. "On a Theorem of Scarf," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 177-180.
    3. Urai, Ken & Murakami, Hiromi, 2016. "Replica core equivalence theorem: An extension of the Debreu–Scarf limit theorem to double infinity monetary economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 83-88.
    4. Hiromi Murakami & Ken Urai, 2017. "Replica core limit theorem for economies with satiation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(2), pages 259-270, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kohzo Shiraishi & Ken Urai & Hiromi Murakami, 2018. "Stability and Universal Implementability of the Price Mechanism," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 18-16, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    2. Charalambos Aliprantis & Kim Border & Owen Burkinshaw, 1996. "Market economies with many commodities," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 19(1), pages 113-185, March.
    3. Athreya, Kartik B., 2014. "Big Ideas in Macroeconomics: A Nontechnical View," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019736, December.
    4. Ken Urai & Hiromi Murakami, 2015. "An Axiomatic Characterization of the Price-Money Message Mechanism," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-31-Rev., Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics, revised Mar 2016.
    5. Ken Urai & Hiromi Murakami, 2014. "Replica Core Equivalence Theorem: An Extension of Debreu-Scarf Limit Theorem to Double Infinity Monetary Economies," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 14-35, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    6. Hiromi Murakami & Ken Urai, 2017. "Replica core limit theorem for economies with satiation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(2), pages 259-270, October.
    7. Ken Urai & Hiromi Murakami, 2017. "Local Independence, Monotonicity, Incentive Compatibility and Axiomatic Characterization of Price-Money Message Mechanism," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 17-08, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    8. Kohzo Shiraishi & Ken Urai & Hiromi Murakami, 2017. "Stability and Universal Implementability of the Price Mechanism," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 17-09, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    9. Manning, Alan, 2007. "Respect," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19722, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Urai, Ken & Murakami, Hiromi, 2016. "Replica core equivalence theorem: An extension of the Debreu–Scarf limit theorem to double infinity monetary economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 83-88.
    11. van der Laan, Gerard & Withagen, Cees, 2003. "Quasi-equilibrium in economies with infinite dimensional commodity spaces: a truncation approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 423-444, January.
    12. Hwang, Chiun-Lin, 1989. "Optimal monetary policy in an open macroeconomic model with rational expectation," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010197, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Janet Hua Jiang & Enchuan Shao, 2014. "Understanding the Cash Demand Puzzle," Staff Working Papers 14-22, Bank of Canada.
    14. Martin Shubik, 1984. "The Cooperative Form, the Value and the Allocation of Joint Costs and Benefits," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 706, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    15. Antoine Bozio & Simon Rabaté & Audrey Rain & Maxime To, 2019. "Quelles règles de pilotage pour un système de retraite à rendement défini?," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02514738, HAL.
    16. de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira & Tiberto, Bruno Pires, 2014. "Public debt and social security: Level of formality matters," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 490-507.
    17. Li, Shiyu & Lin, Shuanglin, 2011. "Is there any gain from social security privatization?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 278-289, September.
    18. Patricia Apps & Ray Rees, 2007. "Population Ageing, Taxation, pensions and Health Costs," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 10(2), pages 79-97.
    19. Jagjit S. Chadha, 2018. "Of Gold and Paper Money," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 86(S1), pages 1-20, September.
    20. repec:bla:scandj:v:103:y:2001:i:3:p:415-43 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Lester G. Telser, 1994. "The Usefulness of Core Theory in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 151-164, Spring.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:105790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.