IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pen/papers/25-015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk compensation among men in Zambia’s national program of voluntary medical male circumcision

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Grau

    (Ministry, Government of Chile)

  • Paul Hewett

    (U.S. NationalInstitutes of Health Center for Scientific Review)

  • Shreemayi Samujjwala

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Petra E. Todd

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

After initial RCTs demonstrated the effectiveness of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) in reducing HIV transmission, 14 eastern and southern African countries implemented VMMC programs on a broad scale. Zambia was one of the first countries to adopt VMMC as part of its HIV prevention strategy. However, the demand for VMMC fell short of initial projections and there were also concerns that men may have increased their risky sexual behaviors after getting the procedure, offsetting the HIV risk reduction benefits. This paper uses a new longitudinal dataset for Zambia to investigate the determinants of VMMC demand and to test for risk compensation in the context of Zambia’s largescale VMMC implementation. The results show that most men understand VMMC benefits but express concerns about potential discomfort and missing work. Also, VMMC demand depends significantly on clinic proximity. Using six different measures of risky behavior and a variety of econometric panel data estimators, including ones that allow for unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity, we find robust evidence that men who obtain VMMC do not increase risky behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Grau & Paul Hewett & Shreemayi Samujjwala & Petra E. Todd, 2025. "Risk compensation among men in Zambia’s national program of voluntary medical male circumcision," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-015, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    • Handle: RePEc:pen:papers:25-015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/working-papers/25-015%20PIER%20Paper%20Submission.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pen:papers:25-015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.