IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/yb8xs_v1.html

ThSQCA: Reproducible Threshold-Sweep Workflows for QCA in R

Author

Listed:
  • Toyoda, Yuki

Abstract

Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) sets thresholds when constructing sets from continuous scales. A standard analysis, however, is fixed to a single set of thresholds, so it does not directly reveal how the sufficiency structure changes across different outcome levels. Researchers can repeat the analysis at individual thresholds, but comparing the emergence and disappearance of configurations, solution fit, and the presence of multiple minimal solutions while keeping settings consistent requires additional implementation. This article introduces the R package Threshold-Sweep Qualitative Comparative Analysis (ThSQCA), which addresses this gap. ThSQCA uses the QCA package as its computational engine and provides a common workflow to run, aggregate, visualize, and report analyses that systematically vary the outcome threshold, the condition thresholds, or both. In a consumer survey of usage intention toward Starbucks (n = 336), moderate target levels of usage intention yielded multiple sufficient paths, whereas the highest target level left only one narrow path, with solution coverage dropping substantially. Varying the threshold that defines service delivery as high further produced different sufficiency structures, including cases with no solution, for the same high level of usage intention. Such differences cannot be observed in a single-threshold analysis. ThSQCA does not automatically select the correct threshold. It is a diagnostic and comparative workflow that clarifies, over a research- or practice-relevant range, at which levels a conclusion holds and where it changes. This allows QCA results to be evaluated not as an answer specific to one threshold, but as decision-relevant information that depends on the target level.

Suggested Citation

  • Toyoda, Yuki, 2026. "ThSQCA: Reproducible Threshold-Sweep Workflows for QCA in R," SocArXiv yb8xs_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yb8xs_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/yb8xs_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6ab3f3595603fe930dd32ad4/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/yb8xs_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioana-Elena Oana & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2024. "A Robustness Test Protocol for Applied QCA: Theory and R Software Application," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(1), pages 57-88, February.
    2. Krogslund, Chris & Choi, Donghyun Danny & Poertner, Mathias, 2015. "Fuzzy Sets on Shaky Ground: Parameter Sensitivity and Confirmation Bias in fsQCA," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 21-41, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Evan J. Douglas & Vidhula Venugopal, 2025. "The complex causality of gender and entrepreneurship: to grow or not to grow?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 1209-1240, August.
    3. Xiyuan Yu & Wenli Liu & Lingli Qing & Di Zhang, 2023. "Improving Farm Cooperatives’ Performance and Sustainability: A Study of Agricultural Managers’ Competencies Based on the Grounded Theory and the fsQCA Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Victoria Finn, 2022. "A qualitative assessment of QCA: method stretching in large-N studies and temporality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3815-3830, October.
    5. Baoying Zhu & Tarlan Ahmadov & Ondřej Kuba & Wolfgang Gerstlberger & Viktor Prokop, 2026. "Bridging Inter‐Organizational Collaboration, Circular Economy Practices, and Firm Performance: The Role of Dynamic Capabilities Within Baltic States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 3037-3063, March.
    6. Michael Baumgartner & Alrik Thiem, 2020. "Often Trusted but Never (Properly) Tested: Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 279-311, May.
    7. Matheus Koengkan & Nuno Silva & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2023. "Assessing Energy Performance Certificates for Buildings: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of Portuguese Municipalities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Ma, Caiyuan & Wang, Billy Wei & Dai, Lingqi & Guan, Xinya & Yang, Zhilin, 2025. "What determines the effectiveness of social media influencer marketing? An fsQCA-based study of influencer characteristics and content features’ configurational effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Ding, Xueqian & Wang, Li & Tan, Yongzhong, 2026. "Influence pathways of village livelihood capital on the idle homesteads reuse," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Martyna Daria Swiatczak, 2022. "Different algorithms, different models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1913-1937, August.
    11. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan & Erzurumlu, Yaman O. & Yoon, YongKi, 2022. "National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Alrik Thiem, 2022. "Beyond the Facts: Limited Empirical Diversity and Causal Inference in Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(2), pages 527-540, May.
    13. Fumeng Li & Jiancheng Long & Wu Zhao, 2022. "Mining Braces of Innovation Linking to Digital Transformation Grounded in TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Bear F. Braumoeller, 2017. "Aggregation Bias and the Analysis of Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in fsQCA," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(2), pages 242-251, March.
    15. Douglas, Evan J. & Shepherd, Dean A. & Prentice, Catherine, 2020. "Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    16. Pereira, Maria & Silva, Graça Miranda & Coelho, Filipe, 2026. "A fuzzy-set QCA approach exploring the role of public and private debt in shaping environmental performance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Qin Huang, 2025. "Towards machine-learning enhanced QCA: optimizing coverage and empirical significance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4259-4281, October.
    18. Kopplin, Cristopher Siegfried & Rösch, Stella Franca, 2021. "Equifinal causes of sustainable clothing purchase behavior: An fsQCA analysis among generation Y," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Barbara Vis & Jan Dul, 2018. "Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just in Kind But Also in Degree," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(4), pages 872-899, November.
    20. Ohlert, Simon & Laibach, Natalie & Harms, Rainer & Bröring, Stefanie, 2025. "Opportunity recognition in the tension field of knowledge and learning: The case of converging industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yb8xs_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.