IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/qy4xu_v1.html

Beyond Static Analysis: A Trajectory-Based Framework for Diagnosing Spatiotemporal Service Mismatches of Local Residents and Tourists

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Jiefeng
  • Xie, Yusong
  • TSUGE, Takahiro
  • KUBO, Takahiro

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES))

Abstract

Tourism and everyday life increasingly intersect in destination spaces, yet existing studies rarely capture how local people and tourists generate unequal access to services through their distinct mobility patterns. This study introduces a trajectory-based spatiotemporal mismatch (TBSTM) framework that links group-specific mobility rhythms to the spatial and temporal distribution of facilities. Using Amami Oshima, Japan, as a case, we integrate a year-long high-resolution mobility trajectory dataset with mobility network analysis, multimodal accessibility modelling, and a standardized trajectory-based supply-demand index to evaluate disparities in service access for both groups. Results show a clear dual structure of inequality. Local people experience persistent, place-specific shortages in essential services, particularly education, healthcare, and administrative functions-concentrated in peripheral communities such as North, Uken, and Kakeromajima. Tourists, in contrast, face seasonal and service-specific deficits in accommodation, food, and tourism amenities, which intensify from quarter 2 to quarter 4 around gateways and major tourist attractions. Network analysis further indicates that local people provide the stable backbone of the island’s mobility system, whereas tourist flows temporarily thicken key nodes without altering overall connectivity. The study extends spatial mismatch theory by embedding dynamic, group-specific mobility evidence into an operational TBSTM framework. It also offers a foundation for dynamic adaptive governance, enabling timely and targeted interventions to enhance equity and resilience in tourism-dependent destinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Jiefeng & Xie, Yusong & TSUGE, Takahiro & KUBO, Takahiro, 2026. "Beyond Static Analysis: A Trajectory-Based Framework for Diagnosing Spatiotemporal Service Mismatches of Local Residents and Tourists," SocArXiv qy4xu_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:qy4xu_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/qy4xu_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6961f7068cb9801fae844b39/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/qy4xu_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Lin, Zhibin & Chen, Ye & Filieri, Raffaele, 2017. "Resident-tourist value co-creation: The role of residents' perceived tourism impacts and life satisfaction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 436-442.
    3. Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vegas-Macias, Jordi, 2025. "Social contact and value co-creation practices. Tourist–resident encounters and urban cycling in Copenhagen," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    3. Chan, Tommy Ho-Yin, 2025. "Socio-material perspectives on perceived accessibility of cycling: A sociological inquiry into practices, regulations and informal rules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    5. Dennis Gaus & Georg Hirte, 2023. "Agglomeration or Market Access? The Defining Factors of Firms' Location Choice," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2045, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong, 2019. "Rural Tourism in Globalizing Beijing: Reproduction of the Mountainous Suburbs into a New Space of Leisure Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu & Corneliu Iațu, 2018. "The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Guzman, Luis A. & Cantillo-Garcia, Victor A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Arellana, Julian, 2023. "How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility and residential self-selection in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Robbennolt, Dale & Beliveau, Anna & Bhat, Chandra R., 2025. "An investigation of physical participation dissonance and virtual activity participation in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Furong Wan & Jianxin Li, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Navigating the Digital Age: City Branding in the Era of Social Media and Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 16666-16699, December.
    12. Kai Wang & Menghan Wang & Chang Gan & Mihai Voda, 2019. "Residents’ Diachronic Perception of the Impacts of Ecological Resettlement in a World Heritage Site," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Angelo Antoci & Paolo Russu & Pier Luigi Sacco & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2022. "Preying on beauty? The complex social dynamics of overtourism," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(1), pages 379-400, January.
    14. Ning, Yihong & Deng, Songyuan & Chen, Yuche, 2025. "Navigating barriers: examining social equality through transportation disadvantages and perceived healthcare accessibility in South Carolina," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Hussam Al Halbusi & Pedro Jimenez Estevez & Tan Eleen & T. Ramayah & Md Uzir Hossain Uzir, 2020. "The Roles of The Physical Environment, Social Servicescape, Co-Created Value, and Customer Satisfaction in Determining Tourists’ Citizenship Behavior: Malaysian Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Yuan Lee & Insin Kim, 2019. "A value co-creation model in brand tribes: the effect of luxury cruise consumers’ power perception," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(1), pages 129-152, March.
    17. Bogdan-Constantin Ibanescu & Mihail Eva & Alexandra Gheorghiu, 2020. "Questioning the Role of Tourism as an Engine for Resilience: The Role of Accessibility and Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    18. El Murr, Karl & Boisjoly, Genevieve & Waygood, E.O.D., 2023. "Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Yoo, Sihyun & Beumer, Ruben & van Wee, Bert & Mouter, Niek & Molin, Eric, 2025. "Perceived accessibility by air transportation: A focus group study of potential air travelers in The Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:qy4xu_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.