IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/gqcnd_v1.html

Artificial Intelligence, Bureaucratic Discretion, and Democratic Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasopoulos, Lefteris Jason

    (University of Georgia)

Abstract

Since COVID-19, governments have accelerated efforts to replace civil servants with AI. This article argues that this rapid substitution risks undermining a core commitment of democratic administration: accountable, reason-giving bureaucratic discretion. Drawing on cases of automated eligibility, sanctioning, and standardization, it shows that algorithmic tools govern through statistical regularities, which can obscure responsibility, mishandle atypical cases, and weaken citizens’ claims to individualized consideration. Building on classic public administration debates and newer work on system-level bureaucracy, the article reframes AI adoption as a constitutional, not merely technical, question: which administrative decisions may be standardized, and which must remain under human control because they implicate fairness, equity, or rights? The article concludes with a selective ``centaur’’ model in which AI supports but does not displace human officials, preserving explanation, accountability, and appeal.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasopoulos, Lefteris Jason, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence, Bureaucratic Discretion, and Democratic Administration," SocArXiv gqcnd_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gqcnd_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gqcnd_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6920a420c8d93f226ae6467d/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/gqcnd_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joe Soss & Richard C. Fording & Sanford F. Schram, 2008. "The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 536-553, July.
    2. Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 87-106, Spring.
    3. Jon Kleinberg & Himabindu Lakkaraju & Jure Leskovec & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 237-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie-Charlotte Klose & Johannes Lederer, 2020. "A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics," Papers 2006.12296, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    2. Peng, Qiao & McKillop, Donal & Quinn, Barry & Liu, Kailong, 2025. "Modeling and predicting failure in US credit unions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 1237-1259.
    3. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    4. Md Mohsan Khudri & Kang Keun Rhee & Mohammad Shabbir Hasan & Karar Zunaid Ahsan, 2023. "Predicting nutritional status for women of childbearing age from their economic, health, and demographic features: A supervised machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-31, May.
    5. Ratzanyel Rincón, 2023. "Quarterly multidimensional poverty estimates in Mexico using machine learning algorithms/Estimaciones trimestrales de pobreza multidimensional en México mediante algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 38(1), pages 3-68.
    6. Daniel Graeber & Lorenz Meister & Carsten Schröder & Sabine Zinn, 2025. "Random Forests for Labor Market Analysis: Balancing Precision and Interpretability," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1230, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Anthony Niblett, 2018. "Regulatory Reform in Ontario: Machine Learning and Regulation," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 507, March.
    8. Delogu, Marco & Lagravinese, Raffaele & Paolini, Dimitri & Resce, Giuliano, 2024. "Predicting dropout from higher education: Evidence from Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Lily Davies & Mark Kattenberg & Benedikt Vogt, 2023. "Predicting Firm Exits with Machine Learning: Implications for Selection into COVID-19 Support and Productivity Growth," CPB Discussion Paper 444, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    10. Anja Garbely & Elias Steiner, 2023. "Understanding compliance with voluntary sustainability standards: a machine learning approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11209-11239, October.
    11. Miguel Alves Pereira, 2025. "Predictive economics: Rethinking economic methodology with machine learning," Papers 2510.04726, arXiv.org.
    12. Körtner, John & Bonoli, Giuliano, 2021. "Predictive Algorithms in the Delivery of Public Employment Services," SocArXiv j7r8y, Center for Open Science.
    13. Colak, Gonul & Fu, Mengchuan & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2022. "On modeling IPO failure risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Prithwiraj Choudhury & Dan Wang & Natalie A. Carlson & Tarun Khanna, 2019. "Machine learning approaches to facial and text analysis: Discovering CEO oral communication styles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(11), pages 1705-1732, November.
    15. Yusuke Narita & Kohei Yata, 2021. "Algorithm is Experiment: Machine Learning, Market Design, and Policy Eligibility Rules," Working Papers 2021-022, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    16. Achim Ahrens & Christian B. Hansen & Mark E. Schaffer, 2020. "lassopack: Model selection and prediction with regularized regression in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 176-235, March.
    17. Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2966-2981, July.
    18. Colak, Gonul & Fu, Mengchuan & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2020. "Why are some Chinese firms failing in the US capital markets? A machine learning approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Battiston, Pietro & Gamba, Simona & Santoro, Alessandro, 2024. "Machine learning and the optimization of prediction-based policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Jeanine Miklós-Thal & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Collusion by Algorithm: Does Better Demand Prediction Facilitate Coordination Between Sellers?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1552-1561, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:gqcnd_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.