IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/6q7uf_v1.html

Geodemographic Inequalities in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption across UK Neighbourhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Singleton, Alex
  • Philips, Ian
  • Anable, Jillian

Abstract

Battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption is an important contributor to the decarbonisation of road transport in the UK and other OECD countries, yet uptake remains highly uneven between places. This paper examines the geography of privately kept battery electric vehicles across UK small areas using quarterly DVLA vehicle licensing records, linked geodemographically to the 2021/22 UK Output Area Classification. The analysis measures observed private vehicle ownership at neighbourhood scale, enabling within local authority variation to be examined directly. The results show that BEV penetration is strongly right-skewed, with adoption concentrated in affluent professional neighbourhoods, prosperous suburban and rural areas, and dense urban cores with relatively small but rapidly electrifying private fleets. Lower uptake is associated with neighbourhoods characterised by rented tenure, terraced housing and flats, where access to private off-street charging is likely to be more constrained. Partitioning the national time series by geodemographic type reveals that the aggregate adoption curve is composed of distinct trajectories, with some early-adopting neighbourhood types showing signs of slower recent growth while later-adopting groups continue to accelerate. Residuals from the geodemographic baseline are spatially clustered, indicating that neighbourhood composition alone does not explain the geography of adoption. The paper demonstrates the value of combining administrative vehicle records with geodemographic classification to identify where BEV adoption is leading, lagging and diverging from demographic expectation, with implications for a more equitable rollout of charging infrastructure and transport decarbonisation policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Singleton, Alex & Philips, Ian & Anable, Jillian, 2026. "Geodemographic Inequalities in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption across UK Neighbourhoods," SocArXiv 6q7uf_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:6q7uf_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/6q7uf_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a840fb92a51187623edd9a6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/6q7uf_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidrich, Oliver & Hill, Graeme A. & Neaimeh, Myriam & Huebner, Yvonne & Blythe, Philip T. & Dawson, Richard J., 2017. "How do cities support electric vehicles and what difference does it make?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 17-23.
    2. Guy Lansley, 2016. "Cars and socio-economics: understanding neighbourhood variations in car characteristics from administrative data," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 264-285, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Yuan & Bai, Xuemei, 2023. "What EV users say about policy efficacy: Evidence from Shanghai," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 16-26.
    2. Aparna Venugopal & Dhirendra Shukla, 2019. "Identifying consumers' engagement with renewable energy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 53-63, January.
    3. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2023. "Risk Assessment Framework for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Development in the United States as an Ancillary Service," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Heidrich, Oliver, 2019. "Emissions from urban bus fleets running on biodiesel blends under real-world operating conditions: Implications for designing future case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 276-292.
    5. Poggi, Francesca & Amado, Miguel, 2024. "The spatial dimension of energy consumption in cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Tan, Ruipeng & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Public perception of new energy vehicles: Evidence from willingness to pay for new energy bus fares in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 347-354.
    7. Bouillass, Ghada & Baltazar, Julien & Yannou, Bernard, 2025. "On the path towards carbon neutrality? A comprehensive analysis of local climate plans in France," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Maciej Tarkowski & Krystian Puzdrakiewicz, 2021. "Connectivity Benefits of Small Zero-Emission Autonomous Ferries in Urban Mobility—Case of the Coastal City of Gdańsk (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Alexandre Lucas & Giuseppe Prettico & Marco Giacomo Flammini & Evangelos Kotsakis & Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera, 2018. "Indicator-Based Methodology for Assessing EV Charging Infrastructure Using Exploratory Data Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Piotr Rosik & Sławomir Goliszek & Tomasz Komornicki & Patryk Duma, 2021. "Forecast of the Impact of Electric Car Battery Performance and Infrastructural and Demographic Changes on Cumulative Accessibility for the Five Most Populous Cities in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Cui Huang & Chao Yang & Jun Su, 2018. "Policy change analysis based on “policy target–policy instrument” patterns: a case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1081-1114, November.
    12. Kester, Johannes & Noel, Lance & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2018. "Policy mechanisms to accelerate electric vehicle adoption: A qualitative review from the Nordic region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 719-731.
    13. Muhammed Cavus & Huseyin Ayan & Dilum Dissanayake & Anurag Sharma & Sanchari Deb & Margaret Bell, 2025. "Forecasting Electric Vehicle Charging Demand in Smart Cities Using Hybrid Deep Learning of Regional Spatial Behaviours," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Georgina Santos, 2018. "Sustainability and Shared Mobility Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Antonia Golab & Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard & Hans Auer, 2022. "Minimum-Cost Fast-Charging Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles along the Austrian High-Level Road Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Nagarajan, Magesh & Mustafee, Navonil, 2023. "Augmenting EV charging infrastructure towards transformative sustainable cities: An equity-based approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Maciej Tarkowski, 2021. "On the Emergence of Sociotechnical Regimes of Electric Urban Water Transit Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Jia Yao & Siqin Xiong & Xiaoming Ma, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of National Policies for Electric Vehicle Uptake Using Econometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Frenkler, Wolf & Küffner, Christoph & Münch, Christopher & Hartmann, Evi, 2026. "Submission “Navigating the Transition: The role of an orchestrator in the shift to electric vehicles in the Heavy-Duty truck Ecosystem”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    20. Wang, Xiaoli & Huang, Lucheng & Daim, Tugrul & Li, Xin & Li, Zhiqiang, 2021. "Evaluation of China's new energy vehicle policy texts with quantitative and qualitative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:6q7uf_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.