IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/pe2zg.html

Who are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Grimmer, Justin
  • Holliday, Derek

    (Stanford University)

  • Lelkes, Yphtach
  • Westwood, Sean

Abstract

Faith in American elections is eroding, with politicians frequently questioning the legitimacy of election results and spreading misinformation about voter fraud. Substantial work has been done to refute misinformation and increase confidence in elections, but often without a clear picture of who skeptics are and why they are skeptical. Using extensive polling data from around the 2022 midterm election (N=5,244), we provide a comprehensive profile of election skeptics: their prevalence, views, and justification. We rely on a large nationally-representative survey and use a mix of quantitative and qualitative data. We find that while skepticism is widespread in the American electorate, its underpinnings are not necessarily deep-seated. Over half of skeptics claim they are skeptical because of how elections are run and nearly one-in-five skeptics claim they are skeptical because of the other party's performance in recent elections, which we corroborate through an event study of the 2022 election.

Suggested Citation

  • Grimmer, Justin & Holliday, Derek & Lelkes, Yphtach & Westwood, Sean, 2023. "Who are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections," OSF Preprints pe2zg, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pe2zg
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pe2zg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/64cd83bb2fe496318961b198/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/pe2zg?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2022. "Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Beber, Bernd & Scacco, Alexandra, 2012. "What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 211-234, April.
    3. Singh, Shane P. & Thornton, Judd R., 2019. "Elections Activate Partisanship across Countries," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(1), pages 248-253, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:pe2zg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Christopher Blattman & Horacio Larreguy & Benjamin Marx & Otis Reid, 2019. "Eat Widely, Vote Wisely ? Lessons from a Campaign Against Vote Buying in Uganda," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03608420, HAL.
    3. Eric Zitzewitz, 2012. "Forensic Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(3), pages 731-769, September.
    4. Poulsen, Jonas, 2013. "After Apartheid: The Effects of ANC Power," Working Paper Series, Center for Fiscal Studies 2013:10, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    5. Michael Callen & James D. Long, 2015. "Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 354-381, January.
    6. Benjamin Crost & Joseph H Felter & Hani Mansour & Daniel I Rees, 0. "Narrow Incumbent Victories and Post-Election Conflict: Evidence from the Philippines," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 34(3), pages 767-789.
    7. Koenig, Christoph, "undated". "Competence vs. Loyalty: Political survival and electoral fraud in Russia’s regions 2000–2012," Economic Research Papers 270014, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    8. Molly Offer-Westort & Leah R. Rosenzweig & Susan Athey, 2024. "Battling the coronavirus ‘infodemic’ among social media users in Kenya and Nigeria," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 823-834, May.
    9. Lukas Linek & Michael Skvrnak & Michal Soltes & Vitezslav Titl, 2024. "Czech Political Candidate and Donation Datasets," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp790, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    10. Casas, Agustín & Díaz, Guillermo & Trindade, André, 2017. "Who monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 136-149.
    11. Natalia Garbiras-Díaz & Mateo Montenegro, 2022. "All Eyes on Them: A Field Experiment on Citizen Oversight and Electoral Integrity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(8), pages 2631-2668, August.
    12. Christoph Koenig, 2024. "With a Little Help From the Crowd: Estimating Election Fraud with Forensic Methods," CEIS Research Paper 584, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 28 Oct 2024.
    13. Khan, Nuzaina & Rand, David & Shurchkov, Olga, 2024. "He Said, She Said: Who Gets Believed When Spreading (Mis)Information," IZA Discussion Papers 17282, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Montag, Josef, 2015. "Identifying Odometer Fraud: Evidence from the Used Car Market in the Czech Republic," MPRA Paper 65182, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Oana Borcan, 2016. "The illicit beneficts of local party alignment in national elections," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2016-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    16. Peter Klimek & Ahmet Aykaç & Stefan Thurner, 2023. "Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Petr Wawrosz, 2022. "How Corruption Is and Should Be Investigated by Economic Theory," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Escobari, Diego & Hoover, Gary A., 2024. "Late-Arriving Votes and Electoral Fraud: A Natural Experiment and Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Kim, Minseong, 2026. "Demography, Early Voting, and Election Integrity in South Korea: Evidence Across Four Electoral Cycles," SocArXiv 5d94n_v1, Center for Open Science.
    20. repec:osf:socarx:u34pr_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Timothy Frye & John Reuter & David Szakonyi, 2012. "Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/PS/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    22. Crost, Benjamin & Felter, Joseph & Mansour, Hani & Rees, Daniel I., 2013. "Election Fraud and Post-Election Conflict: Evidence from the Philippines," IZA Discussion Papers 7469, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pe2zg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.