IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2212.13638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Battling the Coronavirus Infodemic Among Social Media Users in Kenya and Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Molly Offer-Westort
  • Leah R. Rosenzweig
  • Susan Athey

Abstract

How can we induce social media users to be discerning when sharing information during a pandemic? An experiment on Facebook Messenger with users from Kenya (n = 7,498) and Nigeria (n = 7,794) tested interventions designed to decrease intentions to share COVID-19 misinformation without decreasing intentions to share factual posts. The initial stage of the study incorporated: (i) a factorial design with 40 intervention combinations; and (ii) a contextual adaptive design, increasing the probability of assignment to treatments that worked better for previous subjects with similar characteristics. The second stage evaluated the best-performing treatments and a targeted treatment assignment policy estimated from the data. We precisely estimate null effects from warning flags and related article suggestions, tactics used by social media platforms. However, nudges to consider information's accuracy reduced misinformation sharing relative to control by 4.9% (estimate = -2.3 pp, s.e. = 1.0 , Z = -2.31, p = 0.021, 95% CI = [-4.2 , -0.35]). Such low-cost scalable interventions may improve the quality of information circulating online.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly Offer-Westort & Leah R. Rosenzweig & Susan Athey, 2022. "Battling the Coronavirus Infodemic Among Social Media Users in Kenya and Nigeria," Papers 2212.13638, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2212.13638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.13638
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A Stefano Caria & Grant Gordon & Maximilian Kasy & Simon Quinn & Soha Osman Shami & Alexander Teytelboym, 2024. "An Adaptive Targeted Field Experiment: Job Search Assistance for Refugees in Jordan," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 781-836.
    2. Sarah Cotterill & Peter John & Liz Richardson, 2013. "The Impact of a Pledge Request and the Promise of Publicity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Charitable Donations," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 94(1), pages 200-216, March.
    3. Ali, Ayesha & Qazi, Ihsan Ayyub, 2023. "Countering misinformation on social media through educational interventions: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Pakistan," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2022. "Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0228882 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Antonio A. Arechar & Jennifer Allen & Adam J. Berinsky & Rocky Cole & Ziv Epstein & Kiran Garimella & Andrew Gully & Jackson G. Lu & Robert M. Ross & Michael N. Stagnaro & Yunhao Zhang & Gordon Pennyc, 2023. "Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 1502-1513, September.
    7. Badrinathan, Sumitra, 2021. "Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in India," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1325-1341, November.
    8. Bence Bago & David Rand & Gordon Pennycook, 2020. "Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines," Post-Print hal-03477497, HAL.
    9. Antonio A. Arechar & Jennifer Allen & Adam J. Berinsky & Rocky Cole & Ziv Epstein & Kiran Garimella & Andrew Gully & Jackson G. Lu & Robert M. Ross & Michael N. Stagnaro & Yunhao Zhang & Gordon Pennyc, 2023. "Author Correction: Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1797-1797, October.
    10. Maximilian Kasy & Anja Sautmann, 2021. "Adaptive Treatment Assignment in Experiments for Policy Choice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 113-132, January.
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0240005 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Broockman, David E. & Kalla, Joshua L. & Sekhon, Jasjeet S., 2017. "The Design of Field Experiments With Survey Outcomes: A Framework for Selecting More Efficient, Robust, and Ethical Designs," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 435-464, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Pfänder & Sacha Altay, 2025. "Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 688-699, April.
    2. Zhiming Liu, 2025. "Can shifting attention to accuracy reduce misinformation on social media? A replication and extension in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Bahety, Girija & Bauhoff, Sebastian & Patel, Dev & Potter, James, 2021. "Texts don’t nudge: An adaptive trial to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Sergei Guriev & Emeric Henry & Théo Marquis & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2023. "Curtailing False News, Amplifying Truth," Working Papers halshs-04315924, HAL.
    5. Tiziana Assenza & Alberto Cardaci & Stefanie Huber, 2024. "Fake News: Susceptibility, Awareness, and Solutions," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 065, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    6. Xiaoxue Sherry Gao & Glenn W. Harrison & Rusty Tchernis, 2023. "Behavioral welfare economics and risk preferences: a Bayesian approach," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 273-303, April.
    7. Cavanagh,Jack & Fliegner,Jasmin Claire & Kopper,Sarah & Sautmann,Anja, 2023. "A Metadata Schema for Data from Experiments in the Social Sciences," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10296, The World Bank.
    8. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2023. "Asymptotic Representations for Sequential Decisions, Adaptive Experiments, and Batched Bandits," Papers 2302.03117, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    9. Danielle Li & Lindsey R. Raymond & Peter Bergman, 2020. "Hiring as Exploration," NBER Working Papers 27736, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Falkenberg, Max & Cinelli, Matteo & Galeazzi, Alessandro & Bail, Christopher A. & Benito, Rosa & Bruns, Axel & Gruzd, Anatoliy & Lazer, David & Lee, Jae K. & McCoy, Jennifer, 2025. "Towards global equity in political polarization research," OSF Preprints 3wzfq_v1, Center for Open Science.
    11. Joakim Sundh, 2024. "Human behavior in the context of low-probability high-impact events," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Max Cytrynbaum, 2021. "Optimal Stratification of Survey Experiments," Papers 2111.08157, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    13. Tobia Spampatti & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Evelina Trutnevyte & Tobias Brosch, 2024. "Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 380-398, February.
    14. Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Teytelboym, 2023. "Matching with semi-bandits," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 45-66.
    15. Elizaveta Kuznetsova & Mykola Makhortykh & Victoria Vziatysheva & Martha Stolze & Ani Baghumyan & Aleksandra Urman, 2025. "In generative AI we trust: can chatbots effectively verify political information?," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, February.
    16. Susan Athey & Undral Byambadalai & Vitor Hadad & Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy & Weiwen Leung & Joseph Jay Williams, 2022. "Contextual Bandits in a Survey Experiment on Charitable Giving: Within-Experiment Outcomes versus Policy Learning," Papers 2211.12004, arXiv.org.
    17. Inaiya Armeen & Ross Niswanger & Chuan (Annie) Tian, 2025. "Combating Fake News Using Implementation Intentions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1107-1120, June.
    18. Samantha Horn & Sabina J. Sloman, 2022. "A Comparison of Methods for Adaptive Experimentation," Papers 2207.00683, arXiv.org.
    19. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    20. C. Mónica Capra & Bing Jiang & Yuxin Su, 2022. "Do pledges lead to more volunteering? An experimental study," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 87-100, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2212.13638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.