IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/d25se.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Forecasting Waiting Time to Treatment for Emergency Department Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Pak, Anton
  • Gannon, Brenda
  • Staib, Andrew

Abstract

Problem definition. The current systems of reporting waiting time to patients in public emergency departments (EDs) has largely relied on rolling average or median estimators which have limited accuracy. This paper proposes to use the statistical learning algorithms that significantly improve waiting time forecasts. Practical Relevance. Generating and using a large set of queueing and service flow variables, we provide evidence of the improvement in waiting time accuracy and reduction in prediction errors. In addition to the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) and mean absolute prediction error (MAPE), we advocate to use the percentage of underpredicted observations as patients are more concerned when the actual waiting time exceeds the time forecast rather than vice versa. Provision of the accurate waiting time also helps to improve satisfaction of ED patients. Methodology. The use of the statistical learning methods (ridge, LASSO, random forest) is motivated by their advantages in exploring data connections in flexible ways, identifying relevant predictors, and preventing overfitting of the data. We also use quantile regression to generate time forecasts which may better address the patient's asymmetric perception of underpredicted and overpredicted ED waiting times. Results. We find robust evidence that the proposed estimators significantly outperform the commonly implemented rolling average. Using queueing and service flow variables together with information on diurnal fluctuations, quantile regression outperforms the best rolling average by 18% with respect to MSPE and reduces by 42% the number of patients with large underpredicted waiting times. Managerial implications. By reporting more accurate waiting times, hospitals may enjoy higher patient satisfaction. We show that to increase the predictive accuracy, a hospital ED may decide to provide predictions to patients registered only during the daytime when the ED operates at full capacity translating to more predictive service rates and the demand for treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Pak, Anton & Gannon, Brenda & Staib, Andrew, 2020. "Forecasting Waiting Time to Treatment for Emergency Department Patients," OSF Preprints d25se, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d25se
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d25se
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5e7bf9c3c3f8d3002cfa57cc/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/d25se?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Mammi, Irene & Ugolini, Cristina, 2016. "Does the extension of primary care practice opening hours reduce the use of emergency services?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 144-155.
    2. Dolton, Peter & Pathania, Vikram, 2016. "Can increased primary care access reduce demand for emergency care? Evidence from England's 7-day GP opening," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 193-208.
    3. Kuang Xu & Carri W. Chan, 2016. "Using Future Information to Reduce Waiting Times in the Emergency Department via Diversion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 314-331, July.
    4. Yichuan Ding & Eric Park & Mahesh Nagarajan & Eric Grafstein, 2019. "Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 723-741, October.
    5. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2015. "Waiting Patiently: An Empirical Study of Queue Abandonment in an Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 39-59, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mani Suleiman & Haydar Demirhan & Leanne Boyd & Federico Girosi & Vural Aksakalli, 2022. "Bayesian prediction of emergency department wait time," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 275-290, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Elalouf & Guy Wachtel, 2022. "Queueing Problems in Emergency Departments: A Review of Practical Approaches and Research Methodologies," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-46, March.
    2. Guihua Wang, 2022. "The Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Wait Time in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6648-6665, September.
    3. Diwas KC & Tongil Kim, 2022. "Impact of universal healthcare on patient choice and quality of care," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2167-2184, May.
    4. Pinchbeck, Edward W., 2019. "Convenient primary care and emergency hospital utilisation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Cristina Ugolini & Rossella Verzulli & Anna Caterina Leucci, 2023. "The impact of Community Health Centers on inappropriate use of emergency services," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 375-394, February.
    6. Mauro Laudicella & Paolo Li Donni, 2022. "The dynamic interdependence in the demand of primary and emergency secondary care: A hidden Markov approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 521-536, April.
    7. Hong, Michael & Thind, Amardeep & Zaric, Gregory S. & Sarma, Sisira, 2020. "The impact of improved access to after-hours primary care on emergency department and primary care utilization: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 812-818.
    8. Michael F. Kamali & Tolga Tezcan & Ozlem Yildiz, 2019. "When to Use Provider Triage in Emergency Departments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1003-1019, March.
    9. David, Guy & Smith-McLallen, Aaron & Ukert, Benjamin, 2019. "The effect of predictive analytics-driven interventions on healthcare utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 68-79.
    10. Pinchbeck, Edward W., 2019. "Convenient primary care and emergency hospital utilisation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    12. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    13. Wu, Xiaodan & Li, Juan & Chu, Chao-Hsien, 2019. "Modeling multi-stage healthcare systems with service interactions under blocking for bed allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 927-941.
    14. Pak, Anton & Gannon, Brenda, 2021. "Do access, quality and cost of general practice affect emergency department use?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(4), pages 504-511.
    15. Krämer, Jonas & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2019. "Substituting emergency services: primary care vs. hospital care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1053-1060.
    16. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović, 2017. "Personalized queues: the customer view, via a fluid model of serving least-patient first," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 23-53, October.
    17. Liang-Chung Huang & Wu-Fu Chung & Shih-Wei Liu & Jau-Ching Wu & Li-Fu Chen & Yu-Chun Chen, 2019. "Characteristics of Non-Emergent Visits in Emergency Departments: Profiles and Longitudinal Pattern Changes in Taiwan, 2000–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Bolandifar, Ehsan & DeHoratius, Nicole & Olsen, Tava, 2023. "Modeling abandonment behavior among patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 243-254.
    19. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    20. Michael Freeman & Susan Robinson & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Gatekeeping, Fast and Slow: An Empirical Study of Referral Errors in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4209-4232, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d25se. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.